But the path of least resistance and choosing the cheapest alternatives, regardless of consequences, is how we ended up burning 100 million barrels of oil per day plus untold natural gas, coal, etc. It's easier and cheaper than cleaner solutions.
As a simple man, I have not the resources nor ability to fix all that.
I think what you mean "Regardless of Consequences" is NO regard for financial consequence if money can be put towards a more costly technology geared towards incrementally saving the environment.
Do you
A: Drive an EV?
B: Use Solar panels? (And battery backup).
C: Are you upgrading your HVAC system? (Geothermal is best).
D: Green roofs, Carbon Offsets, water recycling, etc
I agree with all those things. I just cannot afford them. If you answer yes to some of those things, my hat is off to you.
I drive an efficient vehicle, save turtles crossing the road, recycle. and doubt that I will have any grandchildren to add to the global burden.
I also am upgrading two large 25 year old R-22 systems (amazingly, these still run well but, one started to leak...) to a more energy efficient system. (No matter 410 or 454, It will be a big win for the carbon offset, but will never be as sturdy as the old systems).
and that counts.
But, between those two, I am debating the math of the Headache, maintenance and total Cost.
Note: I was an early adaptor of R410 in my old house many years ago, The headache and reoccurring breakdowns lasted for years. I regret not waiting several years.
Maybe I should just keep this one limping along for a while.