You want honesty, Gentmach? I've been in a position to hire a lot of people throughout my career, and I have. I've gone to bat for candidates I felt very strongly about (after interviews) and I've outright refused to give my yes vote for people I felt strongly would not be helpful or a positive addition to my team. If your resume had made it through the wall of two executive assistants, a recruiting manager and my staff/associates doing the first/second/third round of resume reviews, I'd be having a discussion with them. And not in a good way.
And I'm not being mean. I'm sure all of those people in the declined pile are nice people. But I don't want to hire people that are merely nice. If I have to work with someone 40, 50, or 60 hours each week, review all of their work, correct their mistakes, and teach them how to be professionally successful and mentor them, they'd better be a heck of a lot more than nice. They need to be smart, amenable to learning, willing to convince me why their position is right, organized, thoughtful, engaging and not embarrass me in front of my clients.
Your resume is the only way you can get through those barriers (aside from knowing someone who knows the person responsible for making a hiring decision) and convince me that you can do all of those things. Your resume doesn't really tell me anything about you, your skills, or what you would bring to the table.
What kind of job are you seeking? What skills do you have that would be beneficial to an organization with that position? What did you accomplish in your former positions? What problems did you solve for either your supervisor/manager or the end client?
I've agreed to review some resumes for people on here before. If you PM me and let me know you want me to do so, I'm happy to review your resume for you and give you more concrete comments. But I don't hold back and feedback is usually much more brutal via text/email than it would be if delivered in person.