My elderly widowed MIL needs assistance with things like cooking and bathing, so she recently hired a few family friends with caregiving experience to assist her for 6.5 hours a day, 7 days a week. She's very sharp mentally but has a host of medical issues, so we know that some type of assisted living/long-term care facility arrangement might be in her future.
I have a free legal service at work and made an appointment to talk to a lawyer to discuss what options were available to protect her assets in the event she moves to an assisted living facility. She doesn't have much; she's a renter, has an after-tax savings account of under $100k, and her income comes from SS, a small pension, a 401(k), and an IRA. I estimate her total annual income from all these sources to be around $40K, which means she makes too much to qualify for MediCal. Her monthly outgoing expenses including the out of pocket caregiving are now around $5K/month.
During the consultation the lawyer made a claim which I found a bit hard to believe, which was that if I hired him he could create a plan to entirely protect her after tax savings account, rather than her needing to spend it down before going in to LTC. I know my MIL is very concerned about leaving some inheritance for my low-income SILs, so it would be a huge relief to her to not have to blow through her savings paying for LTC, but I'm a bit suspicious that this can be accomplished--I expected there might be a way to shelter a little of her savings, but not all of it.
Anyone here have experience with this and can confirm if the lawyer's claim is valid, or should I run not walk away from this guy?