I've been biking here and there for a little over a year, with 10 miles being my longest distance, but those rides are few and far between. However, I've been experiencing knee pain and other physical maladies have started to develop. I'm not saying it's the BIKE'S fault (it could be my poor form, or any other number of non-bike-related contributing factors, even ME), but it's probably a good idea to get it fitted just to remove one variable.
However. I'm not so sure my bike is worthy of getting fitted. It's a used mountain bike that I picked up for $65 at a hole-in-the-wall, Spanish-speaking bike shop in my neighborhood. I've tried using forum member Bakari's bike-buying guide to assess whether my two-wheeled steed is a piece of crap or just "rough around the edges." I couldn't decide. Obviously, I don't need a fancy bike. I like that it's not attractive to thieves, for example, with the Duct-taped accessories such as lights I've cobbled together over the year and the tattered seat. I've already had my seat and handlebar heights adjusted, but I can't tell if that helped.
Is getting it fitted an exercise in futility? Or do professional fittings benefit any bike and its rider, regardless of either's quality? I mean, I'm certainly no triathlete, and my bike has no similar illusions of grandeur either.