So much sunk cost fallacy going on in this thread.
This is - mathematically, umambiguously, demonstrably - a simple question. Would you spend 1.2k on crypto today? Or would you rather have 1.2k in your bank account (or other investments).
If yes, you'd spend 1.2k on crypto, HODL. If not, sell. It really is that easy.
Now, that said, I'm with the other poster who pointed out that *even though this is a mathematically inferior choice, potentially*, it might make sense to just maintain some exposure so that way you don't let the FOMO-beasts rule your investing decisions goign forward. Consider that 1.2k insurance against you making a sub-optimal investing (errr gambling) choice in the future.
Either way, if 3k is a rounding error for you, you'll likely be fine either way so long as you don't bet the farm and go long on ETH or something (please do not do this).
ETA: I also fell for the hype (sigh) and threw 2k at crypto. Lost like $300 before I realized I didn't want to gamble with my hard-earned dollars, so I called those little green soldiers home and put them to work in the salt mines making me mo' money.