When I was in India, I used to ride a freewheeling single gear cycle. Due to the lack of steep hills and younger body parts, it used to be fun.
That bike cost me $60 brand new, was made of iron and had those cheap caliper breaks that pivot in the middle that I had to replace thrice a year and would cost 20c a pair brand new.
The chains and wheels would need to be aligned and greased once a month and I had the tools to do it.
Now that I am in the US, and that I am renting a place 5mi from work (so that I can cycle to work), I now have to buy a cycle again. It's being 10 years since I cycled daily.
I keep reading about people dissing "those cheap retail store bikes" but when I compare these bikes to the one I used to drive back in India, I can see they are of better build quality (atleast from the looks of it)
So, what about this experiment:1. I buy a retail store bicycle
2. In the meantime, I keep my eyes peeled for used ones (
https://forum.mrmoneymustache.com/welcome-to-the-forum/recommend-good-bike-off-craigslist-that-i-can-get-(irvine-ca-)/) on craigslist
3.
If the retail store bicycle fails in some way during 90 days (atleast that's what Walmart's return policy is, not sure about others), I return the bike to store for a refund and post my findings here, and then wait to buy a name brand used off CL
Does this sound like a good idea?
This experiment might be DOA if Walmart refuses to take the bike back, even if defective/damaged, stating that it has been used. (I am not the kind who misuses things though)
If anyone suggests a store besides Walmart for this experiment, do let me know!