The sooner all the unvaxxed people get infected, recover, and develop immunity from Covid, the better. The ones who die or end up with long term health issues only have themselves to blame.
I mean, that's the route the CDC is taking by saying "OK no one needs to wear a mask indoors now if they're vaccinated!" (when you know people who aren't vaxxed are going to go ahead and not mask, since there is no longer the social stigma attached to not masking up in grocery stores, etc.)
And at this point I'm inclined to agree from a certain perspective- now that vaccines are widely available in the US, it's largely a matter of personal responsibility. But...
This strategy, it's a big slap in the face to anyone who has children under 12. Sure, my partner and I are both vaccinated, but this strategy leaves young kids completely exposed. We have worked and worked to keep our whole family safe this last 18+ months, and it sure would be nice to know that we are still safe in grocery stores, etc... I know and understand his risk of *severe* illness is minimal given his age, but I don't really appreciate the CDC not taking a more conservative approach when it comes to the health and safety of my toddler. I basically can't go anywhere indoors with him and feel good about it right now.
Plus, I would argue that the Darwinian approach (let those who are too ignorant to get vaccinated get ill) is not in the best interest of vaccinated people either. I get the sense that we want to minimize the risk of further variants developing in the unvaccinated population that could be less resistant to vaccines, and we probably don't want to put further burdens on our already overtaxed healthcare system. There's probably a slew of articles and data to back this up, but I'll let other people who know more about it take this on. For now, I'm primarily concerned about the direct potential impact to my kid.
tl;dr I understand where you're coming from, but I don't agree- this isn't going to be the optimal approach.