Husband has a will, done by a lawyer. Due to a misunderstanding the apointment maker, he got one, and I didn't. We though the appointment was for both, but it turned out to only be for one and they would not flex on that.
I want exactly the same things he has in his will. Exactly, other than if he dies after me, he has everything that isn't directed to a non-profit going to his family, and if I die after him I'd want that to go to mine. Is there any good reason why we couldn't just copy everything in his exactly, replacing his name and identifying info with mine? Then we could get it notarized. Any reason this is a bad idea? And since I'm not super keen on retyping it all, if I photo copied his with blank paper placed over anything that needed to be changed and then wrote in my info and of course signed the doc in blue ink, is there any reason that would be less legal than a freshly typed document, if you could even tell? Is that really meaningfully different than a document printed on a computer?
(It it matters, we aren't stealing anyone's work or anything like that, or at least not in a way that I think matters since the will was done free through the military base legal office. We are now at a place that doesn't offer that service because this base is so small, though we are entitled to it so we aren't getting a service for which we'd otherwise be paying.)
We don't have kids, so I'm not really super concerned about what happens with our estate. We'll be dead. So intestate wouldn't be the worst thing in the world, but I'd rather our families and chosen non-profits get more and the government get less.