Just looking for opinions since the time is coming up for me to buy tires for both cars. One car is a '96 Nissan Maxima that I'm still driving too and from work everyday. 209k miles and still going strong. Obviously for that car, I'm going with the cheapest possible tire regardless of the warranty on it. I have no clue if that car will make it another 10k or 100k miles.
The other car is a 2010 Prius, about 80k miles. About time for new tires. Will probably stagger it and replace them 2 at a time. I guess my question is do I get cheaper tires that are warrantied for 40k miles or do I pay more and get tires warrantied for 90k miles? Obviously I could calculate a cost per mile. But, I don't know enough about tires to know whether 1) a 90k tire will actually last 90k miles or whether a 40k tire will actually last longer.
For example, I can get any of the following (price given is for two tires installed and then price per thousand miles)
Nika Avatar V344 (40k) - $154/$3.85
Falken Sincera SN250 A/S (75k)- $226/$3.01
Hankook Optimo H724 (70k) - $207/$2.96
Pirelli P4 Four Seasons Plus (80k) - $231/$2.89
Michelin Defender (90k) - $309/$3.43
I mean, if you go by price per thousand miles, it's "cheaper" to pay for the high end Michelin tire than the cheap Nika tire. But seems like the best value is something like the Pirelli tire (25% cheaper per thousand miles than the 'cheap' Nika).
Am I missing something?
Is my reasoning off here?
OR
I can get
Thoughts?