I'm 45 years old and I have never hit another person (with a car). I don't have collision insurance on my car. It's a Pontiac Vibe with 230K miles and worth about $2,000. If I crash my car, I have to buy another car out of pocket, which I am comfortable doing. However, if someone hits me and they don't have insurance, I would like to be covered. I currently have uninsured motor vehicle property damage deductible for $30/year.
I'm in the process of switching insurance for primary home, rental house, two cars, 1 RV and an umbrella policy from Company A (current) to Company B (new). I've been with Company A for 17 years and I have a relationship with the insurance agent. However, company A is 98.8% more expensive than company B for the 3 automobiles and 1 umbrella policy. The home insurance policies are the same price when comparing company A to company B.
Company A quoted me $3,048 to re-new for another year (3 cars & 1 umbrella). Company B quoted me $1533/year for the same coverage. However, company B is recommending that I add Uninsured Motor Vehicle Bodily Injury to my policy for another $731/year. I have never had it in the past.
I don't think I need Uninsured Motor Vehicle Bodily Injury because I have pretty good health insurance through work. If someone hits me and or my family, I might have to come up with the maximum out of pocket, which is $4750/year individual and $9,500/year for family. However, my health insurance would pay the rest. It's a Kaiser Policy that costs $2270/month for 2 adults and 1 child. My employer pays $1630/month and I pay $640/month.
This additional coverage (Uninsured Motor Vehicle Bodily Injury) would protect me against paying my maximum family out of pocket of $9,500/year, if I was hit by someone without insurance. Am I understanding this correctly? Am I missing something?