I like where you’re going with that thinking. It’s not so much about rectifying this situation, it’s more about replacing it with something much better.
Another new piece of information my wife told me last night is that the other assistant lives in another state (presumably in a lower cost of living area too... I think Texas. I was assuming she was in CA - my wife said she actually moved to SD but hated it and moved away lol). She reiterated that she would not feel comfortable paying my wife a rate higher than that assistant even if she works significantly less. She also kept on talking about her bonuses with the context of my wife's overall pay saying "so with the bonus, you're at $36/hour" or something like that). All of these things just sounded like lame excuses. I told my wife last night that's fine if she wants to keep working for her but to realize that all these things are excuses that her financial planner friend is giving her and that she's removing my wife's power and ability to negotiate by reframing this whole discussion in the context of "raises" and giving her the least amount possible. In her "performance review" she gave my wife a 58/60 and docked her two points (more excuses): one in "taking initiative" (e.g. asking the financial planner if she could use help in other areas and being proactive) and then another in "using her judgement" (e.g. being more decisive about things) - my wife refuted her on both points saying that she has repeatedly asked the financial planner if she needs help in other areas and has offered herself in case there's any other work. And for using her judgement/being more decisive, she only seeks clarity guidance on something new that she hasn't seen before (I mean, maybe this one is barely legitimate). Anyway, "performance reviews" seem more appropriate for employees/employers rather than clients/contractors. The whole thing feels like the financial planner writing a Yelp review about my wife and then going over it with her lol.
Ultimately, I know my wife doesn't care as it's just work and she's willing to get paid whatever and now that it's a slight bump she's even more ok with it. But I could tell she was irked about not getting that perfect score (more than getting "full rate approval"). The thing is, if the financial planner gave her a perfect score, it would have justified the full $30 rate amount so she *had* to give her lower marks to justify the partial rate increase acceptance (not raise, even though I'm sure the financial planner wants to think of it in those terms). Anyway, I've done my part to "plant the seed" (of awareness). Now it's just how my wife takes and runs with it (or not). *shrug*