The original poster is definitely eligible for a 2014 bronze plan that is substantially similar to the same as his 2013 catastrophic, with the exception of the added costs for guarantee-issue 3x community-rating pricing and other features designed to more broadly spread the cost of covering sick people (i.e. a low $6K out-of-pocket cap, everyone pays for maternity - even men, stupid liberals, don't know men can't get pregnant).
As a Californian, I am very familiar with CoveredCA. A high-earning 20 y/o will pay the same ~$100/mo for either bronze or catastrophic, 29 y/o will pay the same ~$175/mo for either bronze or catastrophic, 30 y/o will pay ~$180/mo for bronze. Proof that bronze coverage costs an insurance company about the same as catastrophic in 2014. The original poster's lack of access to catastrophic coverage that twenty-somethings have access to in 2014 is a meaningless semantic distinction, worthy of the world's smallest violin.
Glad you have abandoned defense of the obscurity that a $100 preventative annual physical is the cause of the premium increase. It gets old having to keep swatting down such nonsense and of course the opposing side never apologizing for making such a stupid argument in the first place.
Immoral, Ayn Randian, Paul Ryanism, Charles Trevelyanian, short-sighted selfishness are apt descriptions of anyone complaining about the ACA because they don't believe they should be forced to pay one dime more for insurance that benefits someone else. Wanting to go back to your 2013 policy that was priced low based upon your lottery-winning-genes and good health luck is insanely immoral.