yeah CNBC has articles about Milleannials or Boomers, one day the millennials they are presented as positive, i.e. prudent savers with a key eye for a bargain, the next day CNBC will have another article where millennials they are presented negatively, i.e. softies who are spoiled who can't make in the real world;
True is CNBC probably does not care at all what milleannials are or are not; IMO, it is dumb to try and generalize a whole generation (any generation), there is too much variation across such a big group; there are winners and losers in every age group;
the only thing that matters to CNBC is that you read their articles, and that you are briefly entertained so that you stay on their website long enough so that they can sell advertising;
it is a good business model because they do the same thing with the markets in general, if stocks are down, they come out with articles supporting why they are down, the next day if the markets are up, they have a whole new set of articles support why the markets should be up; it goes on endlessly over and over again;
you have to give credit to cramer though for trying to make a boring subject seem interesting enough for tv; on his show he makes all kinds of crazy noises, screams a lot, and jumps up and down like an animal; the most interesting parts of CNBC is when cramer flipped out over bill poole; they should make a show called "cramer's meltdown" where he just sits on a stool by himself in a room, and rants and yells about random finacial stuff as he reads a company's quarterly financial report line-by-line over the course of an hour. They could get a close up of the sweat stains in the armpits of his fancy dress shirt. Then CNBC can put on some graphs and other graphics on the side of the screen convincing you why you should care. I am glad I have my index funds and don't have to worry about buying/selling individual stocks
