Another huge pet peeve of mine is the subtle but significant gap in logic when telling people to 100% of the time do Roth accounts.
He says, "if you take $X/year you end up with $1,000,000 - and then 30% to taxes! so $300k total! do you think you'll pay $300k in taxes on the money to put it in there?" and the answer he is looking for is, "no, I will pay more taxes if I do not do Roth! since I only pay a few thousand a year!"
... but this blatantly ignores that if you invest all your pretax savings you end up with the same (or in most cases, barring significant pension/rental income, more) money at the end.
It's fine advice for most people who will not bother saving the tax savings meaningfully (so then the Roth is better since they save more effectively) but jeesh the intellectual dishonesty of this bothers me.