The Money Mustache Community

Around the Internet => Antimustachian Wall of Shame and Comedy => Topic started by: The Guru on September 12, 2018, 06:09:14 PM

Title: Actually, 2 out of 3 ARE bad....
Post by: The Guru on September 12, 2018, 06:09:14 PM
...when you're talking about these tips to "push your retirement savings strategy into overdrive."

https://smartasset.com/retirement/3-quick-retirement-tips?utm_source=msn&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=msn__falc_sept_0912&utm_content=3quicktips

1. Getting a high-interest savings account isn't a bad idea in itself, though it isn't going to fund anyone's retirement by itself either- especially if one uses the money saved to...

2. Hire a professional advisor- at a cost of 1.xx%, or coincidentally, about what one saves by doing #1
Title: Re: Actually, 2 out of 3 ARE bad....
Post by: dandarc on September 12, 2018, 06:25:52 PM
Don't know about #3 either - default is showing "save 1.024 million to $106,350 in retirement income" Surely they aren't advocating a >10% withdrawal rate?
Title: Re: Actually, 2 out of 3 ARE bad....
Post by: Malloy on September 12, 2018, 09:34:03 PM
That calculator is insane.  It was spitting out 96,000 on 900,000 of savings.  I'm all for playing around with the 4% rule, but I was thinking more like trying some modeling at 4.3%...
Title: Re: Actually, 2 out of 3 ARE bad....
Post by: DS on September 13, 2018, 09:07:58 AM
That calculator is insane.  It was spitting out 96,000 on 900,000 of savings.  I'm all for playing around with the 4% rule, but I was thinking more like trying some modeling at 4.3%...

It maxes out at 40% savings too.

"Monthly savings amount should be at most 40% of your monthly income. We have updated your savings amount to 40%."
Title: Re: Actually, 2 out of 3 ARE bad....
Post by: partdopy on September 13, 2018, 09:33:08 AM
That calculator is insane.  It was spitting out 96,000 on 900,000 of savings.  I'm all for playing around with the 4% rule, but I was thinking more like trying some modeling at 4.3%...

Is it including social security at full SS age too though?  If it's using like 70 as a retirement age it kind of seems reasonable, based on life expectancy you would only have to plan for like 15 years max.
Title: Re: Actually, 2 out of 3 ARE bad....
Post by: Nederstash on September 15, 2018, 12:45:52 PM
That calculator is insane.  It was spitting out 96,000 on 900,000 of savings.  I'm all for playing around with the 4% rule, but I was thinking more like trying some modeling at 4.3%...

It maxes out at 40% savings too.

"Monthly savings amount should be at most 40% of your monthly income. We have updated your savings amount to 40%."

... What
Title: Re: Actually, 2 out of 3 ARE bad....
Post by: DS on September 17, 2018, 02:23:33 PM
That calculator is insane.  It was spitting out 96,000 on 900,000 of savings.  I'm all for playing around with the 4% rule, but I was thinking more like trying some modeling at 4.3%...

It maxes out at 40% savings too.

"Monthly savings amount should be at most 40% of your monthly income. We have updated your savings amount to 40%."

... What

Don't wanna save too much. Gotta live a little!! Haha.