Author Topic: Obamacare survives  (Read 66568 times)

Jack

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 4725
  • Location: Atlanta, GA
Re: Obamacare survives
« Reply #50 on: June 25, 2015, 01:40:19 PM »
It always gets me how a financially responsible community like MMM can have such a majority of it support essentially socialized, government run medicine. I would think the majority would be against and for the competition of the private industry that brings about the greatest responsibility and forces hospitals and insurers to compete for patients. You car insurance competes for you like crazy, imagine if health insurance had to do the same.

Unregulated private health care isn't allowed to happen because it would require allowing people to die if they can't afford care. The only allowable choices are good regulation (i.e., socialism) or corrupt/ineffective/subverted regulation (i.e., what we actually have).

Eric

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 4057
  • Location: On my bike
Re: Obamacare survives
« Reply #51 on: June 25, 2015, 01:40:49 PM »
Judicial activism occurs with both conservative and liberal judges and it's not a "meaningless issue."  There is interpreting the law and then there is stretching interpretation to follow you own beliefs.  We have 3 branches of govt for a reason.

I don't think that imaginary line between interpretation and stretching exists.  Not without some sort of mind reading device.  I guess we'll have to agree to disagree.

Sparafusile

  • Bristles
  • ***
  • Posts: 335
  • Age: 42
  • Location: Indiana, USA
Re: Obamacare survives
« Reply #52 on: June 25, 2015, 01:46:01 PM »
Something is fundamentally broken if we have to hope that the supreme court wont screw over millions of people by screwing up their health care options. As a small business owner married to another small business owner, we depended on the rules put in place by the ACA just to have the option of health care coverage. I'm so thankful that reason and common sense prevailed. Now I hope they can see the same way when it comes to allowing marriage for everyone.

Cougar

  • Bristles
  • ***
  • Posts: 344
Re: Obamacare survives
« Reply #53 on: June 25, 2015, 01:49:00 PM »
It always gets me how a financially responsible community like MMM can have such a majority of it support essentially socialized, government run medicine. I would think the majority would be against and for the competition of the private industry that brings about the greatest responsibility and forces hospitals and insurers to compete for patients. You car insurance competes for you like crazy, imagine if health insurance had to do the same.

Well, I would say under the current system with ACA mandates, they are having to compete, but now they all have to play by the same rules. I can more easily compare my options with my state's insurance exchange, and I went with the cheapest best coverage I could get, so that company is getting my premium money vs. another company.

Also, it's impossible to compare costs when you need health care immediately--there's no calling up of four different ERs when you have a heart attack--ambulance takes you to the nearest hospital. This is another thing that I'd like to see changed, but isn't really addressed with the ACA. And, some things cost what they cost--the drug my husband is on for his chronic condition, for instance, is over $3,500 a month. Lots of factors at play here.

Edited to add: don't confuse the ACA with socialized medicine. The US has that, too--I addressed it in my earlier post. It's called Medicaid, Medicare, and VA care.

i'll grant that obamacare isn't true socialized medicine, in that the govt runs everything(currently); but its going to be a system of greater control of the govt over you; that's never a good thing.

there's going to be cases where some medicines and procedures are held in check on rising costs but that's going to be few or healthcare corporations wouldn't be favoring obamacare so much.

just give it some time.

Midwest

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 1358
Re: Obamacare survives
« Reply #54 on: June 25, 2015, 01:57:26 PM »
Judicial activism occurs with both conservative and liberal judges and it's not a "meaningless issue."  There is interpreting the law and then there is stretching interpretation to follow you own beliefs.  We have 3 branches of govt for a reason.

I don't think that imaginary line between interpretation and stretching exists.  Not without some sort of mind reading device.  I guess we'll have to agree to disagree.

We can agree to disagree, but putting public good (DUI checkpoints for example) above the constitution is the definition of judicial activism in my opinion.  I don't think the line was "imaginary" there.  Certain justices didn't like the result, so they ignored the constitution and allowed arbitrary stops.

We continue to go that direction because a judge felt compelled to over reach.  Now we are faced with huge privacy issue in our country. 

MW
« Last Edit: June 25, 2015, 02:02:47 PM by Midwest »

milesdividendmd

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 1913
  • Location: Portlandia
    • Miles Dividend MD
Re: Obamacare survives
« Reply #55 on: June 25, 2015, 01:59:37 PM »
"its going to be a system of greater control of the govt over you; that's never a good thing."

What evidence do you have for this grand statement?  This appears to be an article of faith on your part.

"there's going to be cases where some medicines and procedures are held in check on rising costs but that's going to be few or healthcare corporations wouldn't be favoring obamacare so much."

Not sure what you are trying to expresss here, but rationing of care far predated the ACA.  At least now when you are insured the insurance company is required to actually insure you to minimum sstandards.  Oh and there is also the small side benefit of a 35% drop in the uninsured rate since obamacares inception.

Mississippi Mudstache

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 2174
  • Age: 40
  • Location: Danielsville, GA
    • A Riving Home - Ramblings of a Recusant Woodworker
Re: Obamacare survives
« Reply #56 on: June 25, 2015, 02:02:22 PM »
"its going to be a system of greater control of the govt over you; that's never a good thing."

What evidence do you have for this grand statement?  This appears to be an article of faith on your part.

"there's going to be cases where some medicines and procedures are held in check on rising costs but that's going to be few or healthcare corporations wouldn't be favoring obamacare so much."

Not sure what you are trying to expresss here, but rationing of care far predated the ACA.  At least now when you are insured the insurance company is required to actually insure you to minimum sstandards.  Oh and there is also the small side benefit of a 35% drop in the uninsured rate since obamacares inception.

Careful using your fancy facts and statistics. We prefer fear-mongering and "slippery slope" analogies around these parts.

waltworks

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 5659
Re: Obamacare survives
« Reply #57 on: June 25, 2015, 02:03:07 PM »
It always gets me how a financially responsible community like MMM can have such a majority of it support essentially socialized, government run medicine. I would think the majority would be against and for the competition of the private industry that brings about the greatest responsibility and forces hospitals and insurers to compete for patients. You car insurance competes for you like crazy, imagine if health insurance had to do the same.

I completely agree, but the bottom line is that the voting public will no way, no how go for a repeal of EMTALA (or of Medicare) - and without getting rid of those, you can't set up such a system. Given the realities, it would arguably be better to go full socialized rather than the half-and-half mess we have now.

I would love to see some libertarians/conservatives in the congress stand up and call for EMTALA to be repealed. They'd be out of office in a heartbeat, because nobody likes dead babies or old folks. If there's someone dying at the doors of the hospital (or in the middle of the wilderness, and a chopper can get there), pretty much everyone ends up saying, "we should save that person."

That means you probably have to just give away the health care, but you should do it in the smartest possible way. The ACA is probably not that way but it's very incrementally smarter than what it replaced.

Jack

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 4725
  • Location: Atlanta, GA
Re: Obamacare survives
« Reply #58 on: June 25, 2015, 02:13:28 PM »
Something is fundamentally broken if we have to hope that the supreme court wont screw over millions of people by screwing up their health care options.

The Supreme Court can't ever screw anyone over. Only Congress can screw people over; the Supreme Court can only hold Congress accountable for it.

thenextguy

  • Stubble
  • **
  • Posts: 205
Re: Obamacare survives
« Reply #59 on: June 25, 2015, 02:27:37 PM »
It always gets me how a financially responsible community like MMM can have such a majority of it support essentially socialized, government run medicine.

*blink*

Which country are you talking about?

NathanP

  • Stubble
  • **
  • Posts: 137
Re: Obamacare survives
« Reply #60 on: June 25, 2015, 02:33:18 PM »
There has been some discussion on how Obamacare does not deal with limiting the cost of healthcare in the US. Ideally it would in these two ways:

  • Newly insured persons would visit their doctors and receive more preventative care. This should lower costs for everyone due to fewer (expensive) ER visits and emergency procedures.
  • Now that (mostly) everyone is properly insured, private insurance companies have the clout to battle with healthcare providers over cost. You can see this happening as some blockbuster drugs (i.e. Sovaldi) are not being covered under insurance due to cost. My employer subsidized insurer also provides a web portal to help direct us to lower cost hospitals and doctors. Although we individual users often cannot comparison shop, hopefully our insurance providers are doing it for us.

Obviously this is a capitalist system so we are going to see an arms race between insurers and hospitals/provider groups over who holds the power in setting prices. In many smaller towns a hospital chain may operate ALL of the hospitals in a large geographic area. Guess who is going to have the upper-hand in determining the negotiated rates for a hospital stay?

Tremeroy

  • 5 O'Clock Shadow
  • *
  • Posts: 65
Re: Obamacare survives
« Reply #61 on: June 25, 2015, 02:34:41 PM »
Elevating "Legislative Intent" over "Plain Language" statutory interpretation leads to sloppy future rulings & general unpredictability in statutory interpretation.

Like its earlier pro-ACA ruling (built on a similarly shaky legal premise), I expect we will see this court quickly back away from the rationale that it used to settle this controversy.


Gin1984

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 4932
Re: Obamacare survives
« Reply #62 on: June 25, 2015, 02:44:06 PM »
It always gets me how a financially responsible community like MMM can have such a majority of it support essentially socialized, government run medicine. I would think the majority would be against and for the competition of the private industry that brings about the greatest responsibility and forces hospitals and insurers to compete for patients. You car insurance competes for you like crazy, imagine if health insurance had to do the same.

I know most here think obamacare is the greatest thing that ever came out of DC, but if that were true; then why did all the stocks of big hospitals and insurers soar after the ruling; because obamacare is making them more profitable and making your opitions less and less.

If Obamacare were so good, doctors wouldn't be quitting, Medicaid(essentially obamacare's prerunner) wouldn't be denied at some of the finest hospitals, doctors clinics that are run by fee for service wouldn't be popping up all over.

obamacare essentially increased the costs and put healthcare services on a permanent decline of 320 million for 10 million that the govt could have taken care of without throwing the healthcare system under the bus. it still looks good now, give it 10 years or read the stories on british healthcare.
When I aged out of my mother's plan, I could get no insurance for ANY amount of money except for COBRA.  And the reason I was denied was a locked up traps.  I could not even find a insurance company that would exclude that and cover me.  If not for COBRA, I would not have had health insurance.  And my mother retired because ACA, she would never have been able to retire early without it, but because of being worried it would be removed by the Supreme Court she stayed in California on COBRA and then CAL-COBRA so that if it was canceled she could go on the uninsurable plan the state had put together.  Now she can move out of California into a low tax area and/or lower COLA which will allow her to stretch her money farther.
The increases in health insurance premiums have increase less once the ACA was passed, than before because of the 80% cap.  I am so grateful for the ACA because now, I don't have to worry about not having insurance.  It means we took the HSA plan which costs us less but when you COBRA it, it is higher than their other plan.  The ACA gives many people health care they otherwise would not get and that means it saving lives.  Oh, and I have more plans I have access to now than I did before, not less. 
And btw, the per-curser to ACA was RomneyCare not Medicaid.

regulator

  • Bristles
  • ***
  • Posts: 469
Re: Obamacare survives
« Reply #63 on: June 25, 2015, 02:45:20 PM »
Ok so as someone who lives in a country with free healthcare can i ask roughly how much do you pay for a average healthcare insurance?

And is a deductible what we would call an excess, i.e. if i smash my car up i have to pay the first £250 of any bill.

Thanks.

I'll bite.  For family coverage of 2 adults and 2 children, we pay about $600/month for a policy where we are on the hook for the first $10,000 of costs per year.  This was our least expensive realistic option.

regulator

  • Bristles
  • ***
  • Posts: 469
Re: Obamacare survives
« Reply #64 on: June 25, 2015, 02:48:54 PM »
but its going to be a system of greater control of the govt over you; that's never a good thing.

Newsflash: that is the way everything in the US has been going for years.  In no way is this restricted to healthcare.

klystomane

  • Stubble
  • **
  • Posts: 180
Re: Obamacare survives
« Reply #65 on: June 25, 2015, 02:51:25 PM »
Ok so as someone who lives in a country with free healthcare can i ask roughly how much do you pay for a average healthcare insurance?

And is a deductible what we would call an excess, i.e. if i smash my car up i have to pay the first £250 of any bill.

Thanks.

I'll bite.  For family coverage of 2 adults and 2 children, we pay about $600/month for a policy where we are on the hook for the first $10,000 of costs per year.  This was our least expensive realistic option.

Does this cover preventive services (immunizations for kids, yearly physical, etc.)?

thenextguy

  • Stubble
  • **
  • Posts: 205
Re: Obamacare survives
« Reply #66 on: June 25, 2015, 03:01:21 PM »
It always gets me how a financially responsible community like MMM can have such a majority of it support essentially socialized, government run medicine. I would think the majority would be against and for the competition of the private industry that brings about the greatest responsibility and forces hospitals and insurers to compete for patients. You car insurance competes for you like crazy, imagine if health insurance had to do the same.

I know most here think obamacare is the greatest thing that ever came out of DC, but if that were true; then why did all the stocks of big hospitals and insurers soar after the ruling; because obamacare is making them more profitable and making your opitions less and less.

If Obamacare were so good, doctors wouldn't be quitting, Medicaid(essentially obamacare's prerunner) wouldn't be denied at some of the finest hospitals, doctors clinics that are run by fee for service wouldn't be popping up all over.

obamacare essentially increased the costs and put healthcare services on a permanent decline of 320 million for 10 million that the govt could have taken care of without throwing the healthcare system under the bus. it still looks good now, give it 10 years or read the stories on british healthcare.
*snip*
And btw, the per-curser to ACA was RomneyCare not Medicaid.

Indeed. And it's worth pointing out that the main concepts of RomneyCare (and later Obamacare), such as the individual mandate and exchanges, were developed in Conservative think tanks in the early 90s.

sol

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 8433
  • Age: 47
  • Location: Pacific Northwest
Re: Obamacare survives
« Reply #67 on: June 25, 2015, 03:06:23 PM »
Ok so as someone who lives in a country with free healthcare can i ask roughly how much do you pay for a average healthcare insurance?

And is a deductible what we would call an excess, i.e. if i smash my car up i have to pay the first £250 of any bill.

Thanks.

I'll bite.  For family coverage of 2 adults and 2 children, we pay about $600/month for a policy where we are on the hook for the first $10,000 of costs per year.  This was our least expensive realistic option.

Does this cover preventive services (immunizations for kids, yearly physical, etc.)?

Yes, most real insurance plans (I.e. not rip off plans) covered preventative care before, and they are all required to cover it now under the ACA.

For comparison purposes, FEHB insures federal employees and all of their pricing information is available online.  $600 biweekly ($1300/month) is about average for good family coverage with no deductible, but the employer pays most of that and the cost to employees is more like $320/month.

This is why it was so important to have employer sponsored health insurance prior to the ACA.  Costs were outrageous to buy it on your own.  Lots of people who would have preferred to quit their corporate jobs and start their own businesses were unable to do so because of the high costs of private health insurance.

regulator

  • Bristles
  • ***
  • Posts: 469
Re: Obamacare survives
« Reply #68 on: June 25, 2015, 03:13:31 PM »
Ok so as someone who lives in a country with free healthcare can i ask roughly how much do you pay for a average healthcare insurance?

And is a deductible what we would call an excess, i.e. if i smash my car up i have to pay the first £250 of any bill.

Thanks.

I'll bite.  For family coverage of 2 adults and 2 children, we pay about $600/month for a policy where we are on the hook for the first $10,000 of costs per year.  This was our least expensive realistic option.

Does this cover preventive services (immunizations for kids, yearly physical, etc.)?

Yearly physical and kid shots are covered free of charge.  If you need literally anything else, get out your wallet.

I should mention that we are paying up for skinny coverage because this is a high income year.  Last year we were heavily subsidized with a premium under $100/month and a deductible of $200/year.  The loss of subsidy on making more is effectively a new edition to the tax code that penalizes you for making money.  The marginal tax rate at some income points (up to 400% FPL) is extremely steep now.

forummm

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 7374
  • Senior Mustachian
Re: Obamacare survives
« Reply #69 on: June 25, 2015, 03:23:25 PM »
Ok so as someone who lives in a country with free healthcare can i ask roughly how much do you pay for a average healthcare insurance?

And is a deductible what we would call an excess, i.e. if i smash my car up i have to pay the first £250 of any bill.

Thanks.

I'll bite.  For family coverage of 2 adults and 2 children, we pay about $600/month for a policy where we are on the hook for the first $10,000 of costs per year.  This was our least expensive realistic option.

Does this cover preventive services (immunizations for kids, yearly physical, etc.)?

Yearly physical and kid shots are covered free of charge.  If you need literally anything else, get out your wallet.

I should mention that we are paying up for skinny coverage because this is a high income year.  Last year we were heavily subsidized with a premium under $100/month and a deductible of $200/year.  The loss of subsidy on making more is effectively a new edition to the tax code that penalizes you for making money.  The marginal tax rate at some income points (up to 400% FPL) is extremely steep now.

If this is a nongrandfathered private plan, then there are actually over 100 preventive services that are covered. A lot of those are probably not recommended for your family (like you might be too young for colorectal cancer screening). But for kids, the list is really long.

www.cdc.gov/prevention for personalized lists and more info.

regulator

  • Bristles
  • ***
  • Posts: 469
Re: Obamacare survives
« Reply #70 on: June 25, 2015, 03:31:03 PM »
Ok so as someone who lives in a country with free healthcare can i ask roughly how much do you pay for a average healthcare insurance?

And is a deductible what we would call an excess, i.e. if i smash my car up i have to pay the first £250 of any bill.

Thanks.

I'll bite.  For family coverage of 2 adults and 2 children, we pay about $600/month for a policy where we are on the hook for the first $10,000 of costs per year.  This was our least expensive realistic option.

Does this cover preventive services (immunizations for kids, yearly physical, etc.)?

Yearly physical and kid shots are covered free of charge.  If you need literally anything else, get out your wallet.

I should mention that we are paying up for skinny coverage because this is a high income year.  Last year we were heavily subsidized with a premium under $100/month and a deductible of $200/year.  The loss of subsidy on making more is effectively a new edition to the tax code that penalizes you for making money.  The marginal tax rate at some income points (up to 400% FPL) is extremely steep now.

If this is a nongrandfathered private plan, then there are actually over 100 preventive services that are covered. A lot of those are probably not recommended for your family (like you might be too young for colorectal cancer screening). But for kids, the list is really long.

www.cdc.gov/prevention for personalized lists and more info.

It is an exchange policy.  Practically speaking, any other healthcare we would use besides a physical and shots would run us hundreds to thousands of dollars in out of pocket costs.  It is what it is.

geekette

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 2558
Re: Obamacare survives
« Reply #71 on: June 25, 2015, 04:14:48 PM »
So much depends on the plan you pick. We looked at the 3 dozen offered to us, and picked one that our doctors participate in and that has a reasonable copays for visits and Rx. If we need big stuff (hospital or imaging) we do have a hefty deductible. For the usual stuff, though, it's great.

Two adults, mid 50's, $1150/month before any subsidies. This year anyway. Next year, it'll go up, I'm told.

marty998

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 7372
  • Location: Sydney, Oz
Re: Obamacare survives
« Reply #72 on: June 25, 2015, 04:15:36 PM »
As an outsider looking in, I find it utterly mad that you lot would tie up your Supreme Court debating what the meaning of the word "state" is.

When one refers to "The State", is not one automatically referring to Government, being either state or federal level interchangeably?


We once got an ointment prescribed by the doctor. 60g of the ointment retailed for $630. How is this even possible? What's even in it?

What's in it doesn't actually matter or costs a couple of cents. You are paying for the 10-15 years of research and development that big pharma and various biotech firms have spent inventing and testing it.

projekt

  • Bristles
  • ***
  • Posts: 340
Re: Obamacare survives
« Reply #73 on: June 25, 2015, 04:23:10 PM »
What's in it doesn't actually matter or costs a couple of cents. You are paying for the 10-15 years of research and development that big pharma and various biotech firms have spent inventing and testing it.

No, you're paying for the monopoly power granted to someone as a substitute for paying for the research through other means.

http://www.cepr.net/publications/reports/financing-drug-research-what-are-the-issues

The existing system also has other costs beyond the sticker price:

http://www.cepr.net/press-center/press-releases/patent-monopolies-mismarketing-drugs

MDM

  • Senior Mustachian
  • ********
  • Posts: 11495
Re: Obamacare survives
« Reply #74 on: June 25, 2015, 04:23:54 PM »
As an outsider looking in, I find it utterly mad that you lot would tie up your Supreme Court debating what the meaning of the word "state" is.

When one refers to "The State", is not one automatically referring to Government, being either state or federal level interchangeably?
Good question.

See http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/14pdf/14-114_qol1.pdf for the full opinion, but the short answer to your question is "no." 
Excerpt from that opinion (highlight added):
"Second, we must determine whether a Federal Exchange is “established by the State” for purposes of Section 36B.   At the outset, it might seem that a Federal Exchange cannot fulfill this requirement.  After all, the Act defines “State” to mean “each of the 50 States and the District of Columbia”—a definition that does not include the Federal Government."

forummm

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 7374
  • Senior Mustachian
Re: Obamacare survives
« Reply #75 on: June 25, 2015, 04:29:50 PM »
What's in it doesn't actually matter or costs a couple of cents. You are paying for the 10-15 years of research and development that big pharma and various biotech firms have spent inventing and testing it.

No, you're paying for the monopoly power granted to someone as a substitute for paying for the research through other means.

http://www.cepr.net/publications/reports/financing-drug-research-what-are-the-issues

The existing system also has other costs beyond the sticker price:

http://www.cepr.net/press-center/press-releases/patent-monopolies-mismarketing-drugs

A lot of the research and discovery that results in drugs is actually paid for by the government and is conducted at universities by faculty, staff, and students. The pharmaceutical companies often come in later and do the rest of the work, like the testing and clinical trials and bringing the drug to market. Pharma spends more money on advertising than on actual research. And much of that research is just to create a "me too" drug that copies what another company's drug does. Viagra comes out, so another firm rushes to create another drug that does the same thing.

klystomane

  • Stubble
  • **
  • Posts: 180
Re: Obamacare survives
« Reply #76 on: June 25, 2015, 04:33:04 PM »
As an outsider looking in, I find it utterly mad that you lot would tie up your Supreme Court debating what the meaning of the word "state" is.

When one refers to "The State", is not one automatically referring to Government, being either state or federal level interchangeably?


We once got an ointment prescribed by the doctor. 60g of the ointment retailed for $630. How is this even possible? What's even in it?

What's in it doesn't actually matter or costs a couple of cents. You are paying for the 10-15 years of research and development that big pharma and various biotech firms have spent inventing and testing it.

My question of what is in it was rhetorical.

Regardless of the amount of research and development, I'm pretty sure the prices are hyperinflated. I have less issues with companies making huge profits off consumable goods (i.e. Apple products), but this is medicine we're talking about.

What if my insurance company didn't cover any portion of the ointment?

Epipens for $300? This is an extra $300-$900 mandatory expense every year that some people have to pony up.

Might as well start billing people for ER before rolling them into the OR: "Sir, you'll have to pay before I can use the defibrillator on you."

Nobody should ever have to consciously choose to accept or reject basic treatment.


« Last Edit: June 25, 2015, 04:35:11 PM by klystomane »

anotherAlias

  • Pencil Stache
  • ****
  • Posts: 508
Re: Obamacare survives
« Reply #77 on: June 25, 2015, 04:36:00 PM »
As an outsider looking in, I find it utterly mad that you lot would tie up your Supreme Court debating what the meaning of the word "state" is.

When one refers to "The State", is not one automatically referring to Government, being either state or federal level interchangeably?

u
We once got an ointment prescribed by the doctor. 60g of the ointment retailed for $630. How is this even possible? What's even in it?

What's in it doesn't actually matter or costs a couple of cents. You are paying for the 10-15 years of research and development that big pharma and various biotech firms have spent inventing anBd testing it.
No, in the U.S., the term state means one of the 50 states that make up the United States.  The Supreme Court wasn't debating the meaning of the word state in that context but rather if the placement of the phrase meant that people in states without a healthcare exchange could get subsidies.  It seems like such a small thing to debate over but really our Supreme Court is in place for precisely that sort of finetoothed comb analysis of our laws.

milesdividendmd

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 1913
  • Location: Portlandia
    • Miles Dividend MD
Re: Obamacare survives
« Reply #78 on: June 25, 2015, 04:38:17 PM »
I was bought a lot of expensive meals as a cardiac fellow by drug/device companies.  The opportunities still abound, but are frankly not worth it.  But a lot of money is "invested' to influence docs to use specific non generic drugs for non evidence based reasons.

If you want the "freedom" to pay for such practices and in so doing to pay more than twice as much for health care as the citizens of any other developed nation (and for worse outcomes) than you should root for repeal of the ACA.

You should also root against medicare being given the opportunity to competitively bid for drug prices.

electriceagle

  • Pencil Stache
  • ****
  • Posts: 521
Re: Obamacare survives
« Reply #79 on: June 25, 2015, 04:41:16 PM »
Ok so as someone who lives in a country with free healthcare can i ask roughly how much do you pay for a average healthcare insurance?

And is a deductible what we would call an excess, i.e. if i smash my car up i have to pay the first £250 of any bill.

Thanks.

In my part of California, the cheapest Obamacare plan is about $225/mo with no subsidies. That plan starts paying when your health costs reach $5000 for the year and covers everything once your costs exceed $6350.

Sound flawed? This is 100x better than the previous status quo.

forummm

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 7374
  • Senior Mustachian
Re: Obamacare survives
« Reply #80 on: June 25, 2015, 04:42:29 PM »
As an outsider looking in, I find it utterly mad that you lot would tie up your Supreme Court debating what the meaning of the word "state" is.

When one refers to "The State", is not one automatically referring to Government, being either state or federal level interchangeably?

The entire case was contrived by opponents of the law that want to see it removed at any cost. Their entire motivation was to get rid of the law and they didn't care how. They had lots of conferences and organizations working to find a way--any way--that the law could be struck down through the courts. They even manufactured plaintiffs (i.e. the people theoretically suing) by finding people who either weren't really harmed or didn't even seem to realize they were part of a lawsuit.

So is that bad?

I don't know. Our judicial system isn't setup to see "what's the most efficient use of people's time?" or "which party is the most ethical?" or "are these lawsuits filed in good faith?".

It's setup to ask "which side does the law agree with?"

So it could be that people would be harmed by the law but not have the resources to do all of this litigating, and these brave and true warriors are fighting the good fight for it all. But "justice is blind" (theoretically) so it doesn't matter what the facts outside the courtroom are.

mm1970

  • Senior Mustachian
  • ********
  • Posts: 10941
Re: Obamacare survives
« Reply #81 on: June 25, 2015, 04:54:48 PM »
It always gets me how a financially responsible community like MMM can have such a majority of it support essentially socialized, government run medicine. I would think the majority would be against and for the competition of the private industry that brings about the greatest responsibility and forces hospitals and insurers to compete for patients. You car insurance competes for you like crazy, imagine if health insurance had to do the same.

I know most here think obamacare is the greatest thing that ever came out of DC, but if that were true; then why did all the stocks of big hospitals and insurers soar after the ruling; because obamacare is making them more profitable and making your opitions less and less.

If Obamacare were so good, doctors wouldn't be quitting, Medicaid(essentially obamacare's prerunner) wouldn't be denied at some of the finest hospitals, doctors clinics that are run by fee for service wouldn't be popping up all over.

obamacare essentially increased the costs and put healthcare services on a permanent decline of 320 million for 10 million that the govt could have taken care of without throwing the healthcare system under the bus. it still looks good now, give it 10 years or read the stories on british healthcare.
When I aged out of my mother's plan, I could get no insurance for ANY amount of money except for COBRA.  And the reason I was denied was a locked up traps.  I could not even find a insurance company that would exclude that and cover me.  If not for COBRA, I would not have had health insurance.  And my mother retired because ACA, she would never have been able to retire early without it, but because of being worried it would be removed by the Supreme Court she stayed in California on COBRA and then CAL-COBRA so that if it was canceled she could go on the uninsurable plan the state had put together.  Now she can move out of California into a low tax area and/or lower COLA which will allow her to stretch her money farther.
The increases in health insurance premiums have increase less once the ACA was passed, than before because of the 80% cap.  I am so grateful for the ACA because now, I don't have to worry about not having insurance.  It means we took the HSA plan which costs us less but when you COBRA it, it is higher than their other plan.  The ACA gives many people health care they otherwise would not get and that means it saving lives.  Oh, and I have more plans I have access to now than I did before, not less. 
And btw, the per-curser to ACA was RomneyCare not Medicaid.
I have pretty good insurance.  I also had really good medical care when I was in the Navy.  So, you know, government.

Right now I have dual coverage by my work and my husband's work.  I have found that over the last 10 years, my insurance costs (deductibles and premiums) have only gone up and up.  Mostly the first 7 of those years.  They haven't changed recently.  My husband's insurance costs went DOWN when the ACA took effect because of the max overhead.

But let me move on, to my friend John, who moved to CA from the East Coast, and could not get insurance from Blue Cross, because of a pre-existing condition.  Note: he had Blue Cross insurance in MD, and he was just asking to transfer it to a CA plan.  But now he was not insurable.  Then there is his wife Kathy.  Who covered the insurance for both of them through work (he does not get insurance at work).  Except she got laid off, and it took 2.5 years to get a new job.  Well, with a mortgage payment, can you REALLY afford COBRA for 2.5 years?  Um, no.  ACA saved their bacon, literally.

And this is just one example. I know too many people who were unable to get coverage because of pre-existing conditions after working and having insurance for THIRTY YEARS.  So then in their 50's they should go bankrupt from cancer?  No.

I consider providing some level of medical insurance or medical care at a reasonable cost to be 'civilized'.  I don't think the ACA is perfect, but you have to start somewhere.  I also am not a fan of the system where my friend's brother DIED because he didn't have insurance and couldn't afford it.

The Accidental Mustachian

  • 5 O'Clock Shadow
  • *
  • Posts: 47
Re: Obamacare survives
« Reply #82 on: June 25, 2015, 05:36:14 PM »
Thankyou to all of those that answered my query about average cost of Insurance. I was only a little appalled gobsmacked as i frequent forums like this so had an idea it wasn't cheap.

I was fucking appalled more surprised by the level of the deductibles to be honest. Given that many non mustachians don't seem to have two pennies to rub together how do they pay these? CC, finance? If you don't pay do you get chased by the healthcare provider or your insurance company?

As someone who is Early retired due to a life changing medical condition i can only thank my lucky stars that i wasn't in the US, as i guess i'd still be early retired but possibly homeless and living on fresh air.

(oh and just triple shocked by the medicine prices!! I'm guessing these aren't covered by insurance unless you have the absolute gold plated insurance policy? What happens if you can't pay them. I'm on a ton of medication, i'm guessing i'd be dead?)
« Last Edit: June 25, 2015, 05:42:22 PM by The Accidental Mustachian »

NaturallyHappier

  • Stubble
  • **
  • Posts: 130
  • Age: 58
  • Location: Near Philadelphia, PA
  • FIRED 3/10/2017
Re: Obamacare survives
« Reply #83 on: June 25, 2015, 05:49:50 PM »
On one hand, I don't think the ACA solved the real problem, which is costs. On the other hand, I think it's an improvement compared to the previous (appalling) status quo, and thus mostly support it.

On the third hand, I agree with Scalia that Congress fucked up the language and that the law should have been struck down on those grounds -- regardless of the havoc that would ensue. It is the SCOTUS's job to uphold the Constitution and legal principle, not to disregard it just because it's inconvenient.

Also, I would have enjoyed the schadenfreude of seeing the Republicans get what they wanted, then get pilloried for it once their their base suddenly realized how screwed they were.

You have 3 hands and you can still get insurance?

MidWestLove

  • Bristles
  • ***
  • Posts: 316
Re: Obamacare survives
« Reply #84 on: June 25, 2015, 05:53:15 PM »
if you do not have the money then state(s) insure it. most of the states I know have (had?) their own insurance programs for least privileged, plus federal government would pay for your medicine if it comes to it. if you happen to have nothing at all and no insurance whatsoever , they will still treat you. so a lot of this 'dying on the doorsteps' BS is just that - BS.

I came from the system that was 'free' (Soviet Union). I also have family and friends in Europe and Israel and would have hard time arguing that is free in any form (you just pay for it in taxes up front vs per need). 

As for ACA - I am glad that we now have options we did not have before. I am not sure if there was a better way to pass it.. I am also not sure if we as society can pay for it without massive explosion of our debt which would come back to be paid one way or another...

milesdividendmd

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 1913
  • Location: Portlandia
    • Miles Dividend MD
Re: Obamacare survives
« Reply #85 on: June 25, 2015, 06:02:48 PM »
if you do not have the money then state(s) insure it. most of the states I know have (had?) their own insurance programs for least privileged, plus federal government would pay for your medicine if it comes to it. if you happen to have nothing at all and no insurance whatsoever , they will still treat you. so a lot of this 'dying on the doorsteps' BS is just that - BS.

I came from the system that was 'free' (Soviet Union). I also have family and friends in Europe and Israel and would have hard time arguing that is free in any form (you just pay for it in taxes up front vs per need). 

As for ACA - I am glad that we now have options we did not have before. I am not sure if there was a better way to pass it.. I am also not sure if we as society can pay for it without massive explosion of our debt which would come back to be paid one way or another...

This criticism ignores that our pre ACA healthcare system was the most expensive in the world, and healthcare inflation has markedly slowed since its passage.

It also ignores that non partisan scoring of the ACA has fond that it will decrease the federal deficit, and thaqt repealing it would increase the deficit.

waltworks

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 5659
Re: Obamacare survives
« Reply #86 on: June 25, 2015, 06:05:18 PM »
if you do not have the money then state(s) insure it. most of the states I know have (had?) their own insurance programs for least privileged, plus federal government would pay for your medicine if it comes to it. if you happen to have nothing at all and no insurance whatsoever , they will still treat you. so a lot of this 'dying on the doorsteps' BS is just that - BS.

"They" (I assume you mean doctors/hospitals) treat you because there is a law that specifically requires them to treat you. It is called EMTALA and was signed into law by Ronald Reagan in the 80s.

So it's not "BS", it's "socialized" healthcare at work.

-W

MDM

  • Senior Mustachian
  • ********
  • Posts: 11495
Re: Obamacare survives
« Reply #87 on: June 25, 2015, 06:35:58 PM »
...and healthcare inflation has markedly slowed since its passage.

And so has overall inflation.  One can debate which is the dog and which the tail.  It would be much easier to defend the quoted phrase if the attached graph showed noticeably negative values since ACA passage.
From http://www.forbes.com/sites/theapothecary/2015/03/09/has-obamacare-fixed-u-s-healthcare-inflation/:

Annamal

  • Bristles
  • ***
  • Posts: 429
Re: Obamacare survives
« Reply #88 on: June 25, 2015, 06:41:51 PM »
From a totally selfish perspective , at least a few of the authors and artists I love have been able to quit day jobs that they were holding on to for healthcare benefits and that ability to quit is a direct result of the ACA. I'm grateful for the increased art-work/opportunities for the self-employed that the ACA provided.

So....Yay for this decision!


Kris

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 7354
Re: Obamacare survives
« Reply #89 on: June 25, 2015, 06:53:28 PM »
A self-employed friend with a preexisting condition who had to get his meds from China now is able to have health insurance through the ACA.

Also, I love that the Republican slur "Obamacare" has stuck so much, so that now people will always know which president finally was able to make a dent or two in our dysfunctional mess of a health care system.

Letj

  • Bristles
  • ***
  • Posts: 415
Re: Obamacare survives
« Reply #90 on: June 25, 2015, 06:58:40 PM »
As an outsider looking in, I find it utterly mad that you lot would tie up your Supreme Court debating what the meaning of the word "state" is.

When one refers to "The State", is not one automatically referring to Government, being either state or federal level interchangeably?

 
They mean the individual states (i.e.  Alaska, Calif, etc...) not the nation as a whole. Each state is allowed autonomy to make it's own laws as long as they abide by federal laws as well as constitutional laws/rights. That's why you'll see each state will have different gun laws, marriage laws, property and tax laws, etc... What's legal in one state can be illegal in another.
Not really. Disabled people are covered by Medicaid or Medicare I believe.

forummm

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 7374
  • Senior Mustachian
Re: Obamacare survives
« Reply #91 on: June 25, 2015, 07:07:47 PM »
Probably someone else answered this already but basically for people who pay for their own medical insurance, the Obamacare/ACA has 3 plans - Bronze, Silver and Gold level plans.

There's also catastrophic coverage (for those under 30 or with a hardship exemption) which is cheaper than bronze usually and platinum (more expensive than gold usually). Bronze covers 60% of actuarial value, silver 70%, gold 80%, and platinum 90%.

Blonde Lawyer

  • Pencil Stache
  • ****
  • Posts: 762
    • My Student Loan Refi Story
Re: Obamacare survives
« Reply #92 on: June 25, 2015, 07:53:45 PM »
Eric,

I don't have a citation for you to published material but I know in the legal world Roe v. Wade is commonly cited as a case where we approve of the result but not how the court got there.  I actually posted about that at one point on here if you search the archives.
« Last Edit: June 25, 2015, 07:58:00 PM by Blonde Lawyer »

Blonde Lawyer

  • Pencil Stache
  • ****
  • Posts: 762
    • My Student Loan Refi Story
Re: Obamacare survives
« Reply #93 on: June 25, 2015, 07:59:09 PM »
As an outsider looking in, I find it utterly mad that you lot would tie up your Supreme Court debating what the meaning of the word "state" is.

When one refers to "The State", is not one automatically referring to Government, being either state or federal level interchangeably?

 
They mean the individual states (i.e.  Alaska, Calif, etc...) not the nation as a whole. Each state is allowed autonomy to make it's own laws as long as they abide by federal laws as well as constitutional laws/rights. That's why you'll see each state will have different gun laws, marriage laws, property and tax laws, etc... What's legal in one state can be illegal in another.
Not really. Disabled people are covered by Medicaid or Medicare I believe.

You have to be disabled (as in on social security) for 2 years before you qualify for Medicare. You need someway to protect yourself those two years.

Jack

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 4725
  • Location: Atlanta, GA
Re: Obamacare survives
« Reply #94 on: June 25, 2015, 08:06:23 PM »
ACA saved their bacon, literally.

Why were they insuring their bacon?

(Hey, you did say "literally!")

On one hand, I don't think the ACA solved the real problem, which is costs. On the other hand, I think it's an improvement compared to the previous (appalling) status quo, and thus mostly support it.

On the third hand, I agree with Scalia that Congress fucked up the language and that the law should have been struck down on those grounds -- regardless of the havoc that would ensue. It is the SCOTUS's job to uphold the Constitution and legal principle, not to disregard it just because it's inconvenient.

Also, I would have enjoyed the schadenfreude of seeing the Republicans get what they wanted, then get pilloried for it once their their base suddenly realized how screwed they were.

You have 3 hands and you can still get insurance?

Who said I only have three?

I'm an Edosian, you insensitive clod!

It didn't count as a pre-existing condition because I just had it grafted on.

Ah, never mind.

Jack

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 4725
  • Location: Atlanta, GA
Re: Obamacare survives
« Reply #95 on: June 25, 2015, 08:09:31 PM »
And now for a more serious comment:

I was bought a lot of expensive meals as a cardiac fellow by drug/device companies.  The opportunities still abound, but are frankly not worth it.  But a lot of money is "invested' to influence docs to use specific non generic drugs for non evidence based reasons.

If you want the "freedom" to pay for such practices and in so doing to pay more than twice as much for health care as the citizens of any other developed nation (and for worse outcomes) than you should root for repeal of the ACA.

You should also root against medicare being given the opportunity to competitively bid for drug prices.

I'm sure the ACA was an improvement in this regard, but it wasn't nearly enough of one. Marketing of prescription medications should simply be banned entirely. (And I have my doubts whether marketing of OTC stuff should be permitted either.)

Our judicial system isn't setup to see "what's the most efficient use of people's time?" or "which party is the most ethical?" or "are these lawsuits filed in good faith?".

This in itself is almost as big a problem as the health system, too.

Eric

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 4057
  • Location: On my bike
Re: Obamacare survives
« Reply #96 on: June 25, 2015, 10:04:22 PM »


 
On the third hand, I agree with Scalia that Congress fucked up the language and that the law should have been struck down on those grounds -- regardless of the havoc that would ensue. It is the SCOTUS's job to uphold the Constitution and legal principle, not to disregard it just because it's inconvenient.

Also, I would have enjoyed the schadenfreude of seeing the Republicans get what they wanted, then get pilloried for it once their their base suddenly realized how screwed they were.

You have 3 hands and you can still get insurance?

Who said I only have three?

I'm an Edosian, you insensitive clod!

It didn't count as a pre-existing condition because I just had it grafted on.

Ah, never mind.
Zaphod? Is that you? Hmmm...I wonder if the ACA would insure 2 heads instead of one? Maybe double the premiums?

Towels cost $638 each when buying from a doctor/hospital.  Guaranteed that you'd never forget yours!

Annamal

  • Bristles
  • ***
  • Posts: 429
Re: Obamacare survives
« Reply #97 on: June 25, 2015, 11:07:59 PM »
Quote

Quote

 
On the third hand, I agree with Scalia that Congress fucked up the language and that the law should have been struck down on those grounds -- regardless of the havoc that would ensue. It is the SCOTUS's job to uphold the Constitution and legal principle, not to disregard it just because it's inconvenient.

Also, I would have enjoyed the schadenfreude of seeing the Republicans get what they wanted, then get pilloried for it once their their base suddenly realized how screwed they were.

You have 3 hands and you can still get insurance?

Who said I only have three?

I'm an Edosian, you insensitive clod!

It didn't count as a pre-existing condition because I just had it grafted on.

Ah, never mind.
Zaphod? Is that you? Hmmm...I wonder if the ACA would insure 2 heads instead of one? Maybe double the premiums?

For a hoopy frood like him, I'm sure they'd waive charges altogether  =)

(off-topic we used to have a cat called Zaphod, he was an insane manx who sadly had only one head)

Bateaux

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 2324
  • Location: Port Vincent
Re: Obamacare survives
« Reply #98 on: June 25, 2015, 11:34:04 PM »
This is a very big day for my future.  Thank you SCOTUS!

rubybeth

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 1390
  • Location: Midwest
Re: Obamacare survives
« Reply #99 on: June 26, 2015, 06:38:33 AM »
Thankyou to all of those that answered my query about average cost of Insurance. I was only a little appalled gobsmacked as i frequent forums like this so had an idea it wasn't cheap.

I was fucking appalled more surprised by the level of the deductibles to be honest. Given that many non mustachians don't seem to have two pennies to rub together how do they pay these? CC, finance? If you don't pay do you get chased by the healthcare provider or your insurance company?

As someone who is Early retired due to a life changing medical condition i can only thank my lucky stars that i wasn't in the US, as i guess i'd still be early retired but possibly homeless and living on fresh air.

(oh and just triple shocked by the medicine prices!! I'm guessing these aren't covered by insurance unless you have the absolute gold plated insurance policy? What happens if you can't pay them. I'm on a ton of medication, i'm guessing i'd be dead?)

Well, if you're truly poor and couldn't afford medical insurance coverage, depending on which state you lived in, you may have qualified for very reduced cost or free health coverage via Medicaid, but state vary wildly. In Minnesota, where I live, which is known for being somewhat more progressive than other states, there was an option for something called MinnesotaCare if you were denied coverage or asked to pay a higher premium due to a pre-existing condition. I will admit that I was on this coverage for a couple years because I was denied private insurance. I had quit a full-time job in another state and moved back home to Minnesota, where I got two part-time jobs with no benefits. I applied for health insurance and was denied because I have allergies and was treated for acne as a teenager. Literally, those were my pre-existing conditions. So after my denial, in the mail a couple days letter, I was offered MinnesotaCare. It was reasonably priced, and run by one of the big name insurance companies in the state (Medica). I was on it for many years until I got a full-time job.

As for medical bills, it's complicated. It's my understanding that they can't charge interest on this debt, but if you were uninsured, one trip to the ER would be pretty financially catastrophic, hence the number of bankruptcies due to medical bills. My deductible being $2,750 for a year isn't too bad, actually--I could have gone with a lower deductible, but had to pay more for my monthly premium. You weigh the options when enrollment comes. I have a spreadsheet where I compare the overall costs, adding up the premium and the deductible and seeing if I feel comfortable being on the hook for that much (or making sure I will have enough saved in case I land in the ER). For DH, with his medication being $3,500/month, he will reach his deductible in less than a month, and then the rest will be covered. This is one reason we are on separate plans, because he will easily reach a lower deductible, whereas I have few health issues and almost never reach my deductible, so it saves us money to be on separate plans.

Also, one thing that hasn't been mentioned is that there are two kinds of plans: High Deductible Health Plans (or HDHPs) and co-pay plans (I forget the official name of these plans). My parents' coverage was a co-pay plan, where every time you visited a doctor or filled a prescription, you just paid a reasonable amount--say $20 or $30. But I'm on a HDHP, so I would pay the full cost of the doctor visit (getting a bill in the mail a couple weeks after the visit) for the full cost--let's say $150. The co-pay plans tend to be a lot more expensive, for good reason. But a HDHP has advantages, too, the main one being that if you have one, you can contribute pre-tax money to a Health Savings Account (or HSA). I do this via my employer, as does my DH, and we contribute the maximum amount we can--$3,350 per person. And then I have the option of investing this money, so it can grow. We have a nice little cushion in our HSAs that will cover our deductibles--it's like an emergency fund specifically for medical stuff (and it can be used on other costs, but then taxes must be paid on it). The other advantage of HDHP is that you don't pay as much for coverage you won't use--so I could have opted for a much higher deductible, like $6,500, and paid even less per month, but I elected the $2,750 deductible because it was closest to the deductible my employer offered.

Okay, this is long. :)

 

Wow, a phone plan for fifteen bucks!