Author Topic: Neoliberalism and the lack of an alternative  (Read 2743 times)

Torran

  • Bristles
  • ***
  • Posts: 370
Neoliberalism and the lack of an alternative
« on: April 15, 2016, 07:35:25 AM »
In the UK Guardian today:

http://www.theguardian.com/books/2016/apr/15/neoliberalism-ideology-problem-george-monbiot

Fascinating stuff.

"When laissez-faire economics led to catastrophe in 1929, Keynes devised a comprehensive economic theory to replace it. When Keynesian demand management hit the buffers in the 70s, there was an alternative ready. [Neoliberalism]. But when neoliberalism fell apart in 2008 there was ... nothing. This is why the zombie walks. The left and centre have produced no new general framework of economic thought for 80 years." [...]

"Keynesianism works by stimulating consumer demand to promote economic growth. Consumer demand and economic growth are the motors of environmental destruction."

Yaeger

  • Pencil Stache
  • ****
  • Posts: 758
  • Age: 41
Re: Neoliberalism and the lack of an alternative
« Reply #1 on: April 16, 2016, 11:04:16 PM »
I don't think laissez-faire economics fell apart and led to the catastrophe which became the Great Depression. It's a common misconception that under-consumption and a stock market bubble caused it, but I think it was caused by the Fed responding by shrinking the money supply and the Hawley-Smoot Tariff Act halting imports that compounded a normal recession and turning into a larger problem.

Keynesianism, from the horse's mouth, is not a long term solution to economic problems. Keynes himself talked about how his theories were insufficient for forecasting long term economic growth. Unfortunately, we've fallen into the trap where we've lowered rates and accumulated debt to the point where it'd be dangerous to normalize the our monetary policy. We provided stimulus with no plan on paying it off during our most recent period of economic growth. Later on, Keynes even expresses that he started believing more and more in the invisible hand theory pushed forward by Adam Smith to better explain economic behavior.

I've always found Austrian economic theory to be more representative of the economy, as it encapsulates both supply and demand better, but that's just my opinion.

Syonyk

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 4610
    • Syonyk's Project Blog
Re: Neoliberalism and the lack of an alternative
« Reply #2 on: April 17, 2016, 07:11:25 PM »
Keynes also generally suggested that the governments should deficit spend during a recession, and then make it up during good economic times.  We're not really doing that either.  Deficit spend during the good times, then PANIC OMG MUST TARP BAILOUT SPEND SPEND SPEND during a recession.  Evidence seems to indicate that a government cannot deficit spend enough to make perpetual good times go on - it just leads to bubbles that do increasing damage as they pop.

We live in interesting times.

franklin w. dixon

  • Bristles
  • ***
  • Posts: 283
Re: Neoliberalism and the lack of an alternative
« Reply #3 on: April 17, 2016, 07:27:41 PM »
I can think of an alternative, which haunts the political economy of the present, as if spectrally,