Strong emotions on the subject apparently. There are certain subjects I feel strongly about as well, indexing being a good example. I have little use for people who claim to be master stock pickers and/or market timers. The internet diet wars are another example, I have a strongly-held belief in that area and I can get a little worked up over flame wars with the other side. Same with politics. It's good to remember that other people's opinions have no effect whatsoever on our own daily lives, so take it in stride.
This question is a closer call, I don't think there is a clear cut answer. I get the arbitrage, I really do. It's not unlike investing on margin, but it's a debt that you already have for the purpose of home ownership, not a debt you took on for the specific purpose of investing. There is an inherent risk that your investment will not beat your mortgage interest rate; this risk scales down with time. If you have a long time horizon and a low rate, more likely than not you will "win" by carrying the mortgage and investing your excess cash. Many people will benefit from the peace of mind they gain by paying the debt down to zero, and that's fine. Sleep well at night. Other people will roll with it and invest, and that's fine too.
And you know what is funny about people getting upset about this subject....
They are upset about winning or winning slightly more.
In both cases they are more successful than the majority of people in the US yet you would think that one choice over the other makes you immoral.
Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk
You are absolutely right about this. Both scenarios are winning, and are good financial decisions. The immorality comes in when someone feels a virtual high-five from a stranger is more important than someone new to the forum being informed. There is a pervasive myth in the US that POYM is optimal, and it should be challenged, just as MMM's facepunches towards clown cars, cable TV, and luxury in general are enlightening challenges to other widely held assumptions. People benefit greatly from these, including myself. If done in an impersonal, informative manner, a POYM facepunch is and should be no big deal, like any other facepunch. To deny people this benefit is
selfish.
There is a safe space thread for POYM where
facepunches are not allowed, so all the fist-bumping and back patting anyone could ever want is there for the taking. No one will "crap on their happiness" there, so I guess I don't get the compulsion to spread it to other areas of the forum. Some of these POYMers twist themselves in knots whining for facepunch immunity, yet somehow ignoring that there is a place
where this already exists!!! All they would have to say is "Hey, OP, post this thread on our POYM safe space and we'll party!!!!" To need more than this is
greed.
Market timers who claim to have made money get roundly facepunched, and I don't see a mob of angry defenders coming to their rescue, so why should POYM be any different? The timers did better than not investing at all, so shouldn't a celebration for this major financial decision also be in order? To feel only POYM is only worthy of vehement protection is
hypocrisy.