I'm in a bit of a quandry, and hoping some of my fellow Mustachians can help me reason it out.
My husband and I are about 4-8 years from FIRE, based off our models. We live in Austin, TX (fairly low COL) and will have paid off our house and the last of the hubby's student loans by the end of the year, then are just pumping everything else towards FIRE.
We both work in the tech industry. The vast majority of the time, I like my job, which pays me well in the Austin market. Despite not looking for a new job, I got a call from a recruiter for a position that actually sounds pretty cool at another tech company. It would pay considerably better than my current job, but it's located in the Bay Area (super high COL). I'm now at the point in interviewing where they're wanting to fly me out for in-persons.
If we were to move, the hubby (also in tech) would likely be able to get a higher paying job fairly quickly in the Bay Area as well. All told, we would probably be able to increase our income by about 35%.
But: Nerdwallet says cost of living is 85% higher around San Francisco than it is in Austin. At least 10% of that income would now have to go to state income taxes, which we don't currently have in Austin. And b/c real estate out there is ridic, we'd become renters instead of owners (probably hanging on to the existing house in Austin as a rental property, but still.) And whenever we *are* able to retire, in 4-8 years, we'd be looking at a self-funded move back to a lower COL area, whereas if we retire in Austin, we'd likely just stay put.
Is there any scenario where it makes sense financially to make the move and take the new job? I'm thinking no, but I'm a little starstruck by the "target salary" they're discussing. Would love other opinions/analysis.