I'm not convinced you have discredited the whole field of evolutionary psych with this post.
I'm not convinced we have to. Evolutionary psychology is widely considered a sham science in academic circles. They're a relatively recent field, and they immediately and negligently overstepped the bounds of their data and spent their first decade publishing unsupported speculation as if it were accepted fact. Plus, lots of it was gross and is now only cited by incel red-pill types desperately looking for a justification for their anger management problems.
There's got to be some value in there somewhere, but as of 2019 evolutionary psychology is a punchline more often than anything else.
Sentiments are interesting but arguments are better. Feel free to engage in the latter. Is my back hair a construct? My testicles? My beard? Why is it assumed that genetic selection and dimorphism ends at the bottom end of the brainstem? It seems to me that the burden of proof lies mostly on the skeptics.
Now I don't mean to suggest there aren't social forces that affect outcomes in the workplace, for instance. But it is critical for society to assess the cause of an undesirable outcome rather than presume it is willful malice or even faulty.
1. You argue for evolutionary psychology, but every example you give is of a biological difference. So I would say to you, "Sentiments are interesting but arguments are better."
2. Here's an analysis of 1000's of done over 20 years that finds virtually no differences in behavior between genders:
https://www.apa.org/research/action/difference"[Hyde] analyzed how prior research assessed the impact of gender on many psychological traits and abilities, including
cognitive abilities, verbal and nonverbal communication, aggression, leadership, self-esteem, moral reasoning and motor behaviors. Hyde observed that across the dozens of studies, consistent with the gender similarities hypothesis,
gender differences had either no or a very small effect on most of the psychological variables examined. Only a few main differences appeared: Compared with women, men could throw farther, were more physically aggressive, masturbated more, and held more positive attitudes about sex in uncommitted relationships."
3. Here's a recent study on the idea of gender brain dimorphism:
https://www.pnas.org/content/112/50/15468"Here, analysis of MRIs of more than 1,400 human brains from four datasets reveals extensive overlap between the distributions of females and males for all gray matter, white matter, and connections assessed. Moreover, analyses of internal consistency reveal that brains with features that are consistently at one end of the “maleness-femaleness” continuum are rare. Rather, most brains are comprised of unique “mosaics” of features, some more common in females compared with males, some more common in males compared with females, and some common in both females and males. Our findings are robust across sample, age, type of MRI, and method of analysis. These findings are corroborated by a similar analysis of personality traits, attitudes, interests, and behaviors of more than 5,500 individuals, which reveals that internal consistency is extremely rare. Our study demonstrates that, although there are sex/gender differences in the brain, human brains do not belong to one of two distinct categories: male brain/female brain."