In that case, either poor people die because they don't have enough money for the treatment they need, or the treatment is given and the state bears the cost anyway. Which one is the scenario you're advocating for?
Right now, hospitals in several areas can't treat patients because they are overloaded with COVID patients who chose not to be vaccinated. Wealthy people in those areas have the means to go elsewhere. Poor people do not. What do you suggest?
The frustration about people who won't vaccinate is understandable, and certainly something I share. But have to suggest that people who don't get the covid vaccine be treated the same way that other people who make choices that get them into the ER be treated. They are triaged with everyone else.
This is what we do with people who eat too much and become obese. This is what we do with people who smoke and get lung cancer. This is what we do with people who play football and get head injuries. This is what we do with people who drink too much and get into car accidents. This is what we do with hikers who get lost in the woods and are found in trouble from exposure.
We don't say:
- Don't wanna die? Don't eat so much, fattie!
- Don't wanna die? Don't smoke, loser!
- Don't wanna die? Don't play sports, meathead!
- Don't wanna die? Don't drink alcohol, lush!
- Don't wanna die? Don't hike you damned hippie!
Medical treatment is not something that you revoke because you disagree with a person's choices in life. Because it's probably possible to find some reason to revoke medical treatment for
anyone.