I recently got more acquainted with the inner workings of my 2002 Nissan Frontier and found most of the DIY work I needed to accomplish pretty straightforward. I even exclaimed at one point to my friend helping me "I think my model of this truck is the easiest, most simplified version to work on, seeing what these other scenarios could be if I had an automatic transmission, power this or that, etc."
Nonetheless, I am now slowly looking to find a new car in the next year or so. With my previous experience in mind, I have been doing some research on hybrid cars, for instance the hybrid Toyota Rav 4, the Hybrid Subaru Crosstrek, or the Hybrid Nissan Rogue. In reading about them, I see that the hybrid version of the Toyota has 4 extra motors sending power to all of its wheels, and extra battery power, accounting for an extra 325 lbs over the non-hybrid variant.
I don't know much about this, but at first glance that seems like "a lot more complexity", for starters.
I'm not knocking hybrids generally, and I'm not suggesting they aren't practical. Saving money on gas for the whole life of the car sure is practical, and paying a little premium up front to do so sure seems to pay off.
But, if DIY/insourcing is a key tenet of Mustachianism, do Hybrid cars bring additional complexity that more often stands in the way of being able to fix your own car when it breaks, maintain it as needed, etc.?
Perhaps I'm just overstating in my head how much more complex they are. Changing your brake pads for example...with a hybrid, does this involve getting around some motor or something?
So what do you think? Are hybrid cars Mustachian?