Thanks all. I only became aware of these rules recently, nobody else has ever mentioned them and I hadn't read about them elsewhere. But, I'm glad that I did find out about them before executing my little scheme.
The 'recycling' clause is only there to prevent you from taking money out of a SIPP only to then pay it back in = profit, ie. pay in £1k, withdraw £1.25k, pay in £1.25k, withdraw £1.56k, and repeat.
This can only be a concern (to the taxman) if you continue to contribute to your SIPP after you've started withdrawals.
if, once you retire and start SIPP withdrawals you no longer contribute to a SIPP, you are not recycling.
I've read much more than the 2 links I gave, and I think that you're absolutely correct in this interpretation. My considered opinion is that I'd
probably be OK. But:
Do you actually need to take all the tax free cash in one go? Life is much simpler if you can go the UPFLS route and take the money out more gradually. If you crystallise £29,996 a year then you are only taking £7,499 in TFLS each time (the balance being taxable) and the recycling rules can never be triggered.
Basically if you need to take it all back out again for cashflow reasons then that would seem very much to be recycling. If you don't, then don't and the problem doesn't arise.
No we don't need the money, it has been taken from other reserves that MrsA would like to be replenished (just because she likes to know it's there) but that we don't 'need'.
I think we'll do as
@PhilB suggests. Draw slightly less than the £7.5k tax-free initially, then just over 12 months later (maybe) draw the full remainder of the 25%. I think the HMRC would be hard pushed to suggest the recycling rules were broken in the 2024/25 tax year if the contributions were made during the 2022/23 tax year.
But initially I'll pay the money in, FIRE in a few months, draw £7,499, then think about the rest later.
I'm sure that topping up your allowance before retirement then drawing it is not unusual, and (from what I can gather) the concern really is what
@LateStarter wrote. But as
@PhilB wrote, better not to disturb HMRC if it is not needed. And the penalty is high.