This situation does not pertain to me, but I'm curious. Under US law, suppose I'm an author, and I am to receive an advance of $400,000 on a book that will take four years to write. In all likelihood, royalties will never cover the advance, and so, that will be all my income for those four years.
The naive tax treatment is to recognize the income all in the first year. This gives you a federal tax liability of around $115,000 in that year, then none for the following three. If I were able to recognize the income at $100,000 per year, my tax liability would be a good deal less: around $80,000 for the four years. The difference is more and more stark as the amount of money in question decreases.
My question, then, is whether there is any legal way to set it up so that you can recognize the income this way. Would it work to have the payor pay an irrevocable trust which disburses the money at fixed intervals? Does it work if the payor sets up an annuity rather than giving you the money directly? In both cases, you're really receiving all the value immediately, you're just choosing to make some of it off-limits to yourself.
Please satisfy my curiosity, dear tax experts!