Previously, though having cancelled my cable subscription, I was using the existing cable line for the free access to over-the-air channels. (Broadcasting this over-the-air content via cable is completely up to the cable company and, I guess, a courtesy - I was not stealing cable.) This worked great for about a year until our local cable provider made a change. My 24 channels dropped to 4 - no NBC, ABC, CBS, or PBS which sucked.
Most people I've chatted with about this are convinced I was somehow stealing cable.
Sorry chum, but let me introduce you to
47 USC §553 - Unauthorized reception of cable service passed in 2009.
(a) Unauthorized interception or receipt or assistance in intercepting or receiving service; “assist in intercepting or receiving” defined
(1) No person shall intercept or receive or assist in intercepting or receiving any communications service offered over a cable system, unless specifically authorized to do so by a cable operator or as may otherwise be specifically authorized by law.
Layer this with the
FCC 12-126 ruling in 2012 (which is why you lost access), and the fact that the Supreme Court ruling against Aereo this year involved them not paying for rights to rebroadcast OTA programming as a cable operator...
Cable companies have to pay licensing for and additionally bill for these services, even for the stations that are broadcast. Just because one of their field reps was too lazy to put the filter in place on your connection doesn't
imply access permission. If you're not paying, you don't have specifically authorized permission for access by the cable operator. Under the current legislation and the methods by which cable operators define their services, if you don't have specifically authorized permission for access, you're breaking federal law by watching QAM video transmitted over their cable without paying them for access to those stations, even if they're available over the air.
Your friends may not be as intimate with the law as I am, but they were right. I may not wholly agree with the legislation on the book, but what you were describing
was technically theft.