Parallels can already run Windows 11 ARM in a VM on Apple silicon. I'm following some discussions about issues installing & running Quicken on such a setup; those who have gotten it to work say it's speedy.
Unlike Parallels, VirtualBox is free, so development may take a while longer. As we're targeting purchasing our new Macs during a visit to the US in a few months, perhaps the bugs may have shaken out by then.
I suppose I could always use a cloud platform (ACS, Azure) to run Quicken on a Win11 VM...
Ah, great. Sounds like you've got your ear closer to the ground than I do. :-)
FWIW, it kind of blew my mind how well Apple executed the Intel -> ARM transition. VMs (and kernel extensions) were some of the few gotchas I was aware of. I'm sure any remaining issues will get sorted out in good time.
@FiveSigmas et al.,
So I bought a sweet new M2 MacBook Pro, I’m very pleased with this awesome upgrade over my 11 year-old previous MBP.
After looking into Parallels (quite expensive) and not seeing any progress from Virtual Box, I decided to install & run VMWare Fusion.
Somewhere (I’ll update this post if I find it again) I read instructions on how to install Windows 11 ARM. In short, you install Parallels and have it download Windows 11 ARM for you, then stop the installation. Then you have Fusion boot the .iso you downloaded to install Win 11. Once I got Win 11 installed, it was pretty easy to get Quicken going.
Unlike Virtual Box, Fusion doesn’t do a good job for establishing shared data between the host and virtual machines, so I used SMB as a workaround to load my migrated Quicken data. Now that I have that loaded, I turned off sharing (it’s a potential security vulnerability). I back up to a cloud service.
One can never experience the same speed on a VM as on a hardware host, and my Quicken data file is quite large, but I find the performance reasonably good, and a night/day improvement compared to my old MBP, under this setup.