I'd request you to contemplate the fact that "right wing" voting pattern has a very strong positive correlation with usage of welfare and government subsidies.
Look at the blue and red states. Which ones have more welfare recipients on average (when you include social security and medicare, which *are* welfare programs)? Which ones gives less in taxes to Feds than they get in federal expenditure?
Do you think your neighbors would be okay with that if they *really* cared about freeloading? Wouldn't they be concentrating on getting their neighbors and state residents off freeloading before they mouthed off about urban poor if they were serious about this whole freeloading business?
A month ago I read an article about a deep Republican small town where they were all totally happy that a government-subsidized store opened because the next (free market one) was 20 miles away.
I could not think of anything more Socialist than this.
And they drive from their (subsidized) agriculture industry job in a (bailed out automaker’s) pickup truck burning multiple gallons per trip of (subsidized) oil products with a big (made in China) American flag flapping from the truck bed, on their way to the drug store to buy
opiates painkillers (marketed by government-mandated monopolists) to treat the back pain they can’t afford to get properly treated, so maybe they can tolerate the pain and work tomorrow.
All these subsidies are red-blooded American capitalism just like the founders intended, but an expansion of Medicaid would open the door to a Stalinist hell where people beg faceless bureaucracies to please treat their ... back pain... and are told there are insufficient resources or that you didn’t fill out a form right or that the condition was present before you signed the form. You can bet in such a dystopian world the Marxist regime bosses would demand forced labor in exchange for access to medical care!