Since the concept of false equivalency seems to be in the news lately, I think a larger issue is being ignored when it comes to the Trump/Kim comparisons. At some level there is a mistake of defaulting to the logic that Trump can't be that bad, or as bad, since he is a strong leader in the keeping with what we have seen and experienced in our past presidents. He may be flawed, but there is an equivalency, a base line of what we know our leaders to be. Therefore, comparing him to Kim is ridiculous. The interesting part of that assumption is that the folks that know him best, and seen him in action the longest, know better. There is a reason he had a landslide victory in places like SD, and MT. and got stomped in NYC, with 10% of the vote in Manhattan. It's simple, these are the people that spent forty years watching this egomaniacal man-baby as he robbed small contractors, architects and suppliers on his trophy projects, as he used illegal workers to do the work. They watched him continuously lie, as if the truth was simply a matter of opinion. They watched him degrade women and treat minorities as second class citizens. They watched him defraud innocent people with his university. And they watched a desperate con-man, who would say and do anything to be in the spot light, and adored. In the end they know the Donald, and they expressed their opinion. For any of you who think that this horrendously sad excuse for a leader wouldn't be the next Kim, or Hitler, if circumstances were different, you are sadly mistaken.