Abortion is about human rights: a woman's fundamental freedom to private medical assistance free from government intervention. And campaign finance laws are about preventing the rich from corrupting the systems that govern us all. The conservative majority on the court has put individual personal preference and ideology above every known principle of freedom, fairness and democracy.
I do not want to derail this into an abortion debate, but many would disagree with your characterization of abortion. We do not possess, and never have possessed, complete autonomy over our bodies. The government has always been able to intervene in some capacity.
While I certainly understand and agree with a person’s general right to autonomy, abortion is tricky because it involves another human life, or the possibility of human life.
Is the fetus entitled to equal protection? Is it entitled to due process? If yes to either, at what stage?
These are age old philosophical questions, and the Supreme Court currently thinks the Constitution provides the fetus with due process and equal protection in the third trimester.
I frankly do not see how the Constitution answers these inquiries. I think it’s an ethical and moral issue that requires each local community (state) to answer rather than an unelected body of nine.