Author Topic: Trump outrage of the day  (Read 500980 times)

frugalnacho

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 4555
  • Age: 38
  • Location: Madison Heights, Michigan
Re: Trump outrage of the day
« Reply #6550 on: January 07, 2021, 12:18:03 PM »
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ehnpwH_0b8

Yeah, no cause for alarm...

No no, they are chanting "boo urns".

OtherJen

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 4223
  • Location: Metro Detroit
Re: Trump outrage of the day
« Reply #6551 on: January 07, 2021, 12:30:45 PM »
The president won't address the nation but will take the time to call in and receive adulation from the Republican National Convention.

Anyone who still had any question about the loyalty of the GOP to cult leader over country, here's your answer.

OtherJen

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 4223
  • Location: Metro Detroit
Re: Trump outrage of the day
« Reply #6552 on: January 07, 2021, 12:36:04 PM »
The person who was shot was crawling through a window that led to where the Vice President and the Speaker were. Number 2 and 3 in power in the country. She was told repeatedly to stop, to stand down.

She was attempting to harm government officials, so she was shot. It's sad that someone died but 100% completely justified.

Wild speculation.  No weapons were found on her.

Dude, please. Everyone has seen the video where she broke the window and then tried to climb into the chamber where Secret Service was protecting the Vice President and Members of Congress. She did this to herself.

I didn't say anything to the contrary, did I?

What exactly are you trying to argue, then?

bacchi

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 5445
Re: Trump outrage of the day
« Reply #6553 on: January 07, 2021, 12:38:40 PM »
The person who was shot was crawling through a window that led to where the Vice President and the Speaker were. Number 2 and 3 in power in the country. She was told repeatedly to stop, to stand down.

She was attempting to harm government officials, so she was shot. It's sad that someone died but 100% completely justified.

Wild speculation.  No weapons were found on her.

Dude, please. Everyone has seen the video where she broke the window and then tried to climb into the chamber where Secret Service was protecting the Vice President and Members of Congress. She did this to herself.

I didn't say anything to the contrary, did I?

What exactly are you trying to argue, then?

There are very fine people on both sides.

Montecarlo

  • Pencil Stache
  • ****
  • Posts: 671
Re: Trump outrage of the day
« Reply #6554 on: January 07, 2021, 12:52:22 PM »

What do you think should have happened here?

A woman who was warned multiple times, presented with an obviously barricaded door where there are people with guns drawn standing right behind it jumps up and tries to charge over the barricade.

I mean... what do you think should happen.

Asked and answered.  I supported the police response.

Montecarlo

  • Pencil Stache
  • ****
  • Posts: 671
Re: Trump outrage of the day
« Reply #6555 on: January 07, 2021, 12:53:57 PM »
What exactly are you trying to argue, then?

It's been very clear what I've been arguing, against speculation and for calmer rhetoric.  With Trump about to be purged it's time.  You guys seem to have taken that to mean I support these fools.  What can I do?

Glenstache

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 2854
  • Location: Seattle!
  • Target FI date 2027 (maybe?)
Re: Trump outrage of the day
« Reply #6556 on: January 07, 2021, 12:57:06 PM »
Pelosi has told Pence that if he doesn't invoke the 25th in a day, she is prepared to move forward with impeachment. 25th is clearly the cleanest option for all involved, sycophants aside.

bacchi

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 5445
Re: Trump outrage of the day
« Reply #6557 on: January 07, 2021, 12:59:58 PM »
Pelosi has told Pence that if he doesn't invoke the 25th in a day, she is prepared to move forward with impeachment. 25th is clearly the cleanest option for all involved, sycophants aside.

Unfortunately, the 25th requires a majority of the Cabinet. If the more patriotic Cabinet members resign, that leaves the loyalists behind.

Impeachment is gonna happen.

GuitarStv

  • Senior Mustachian
  • ********
  • Posts: 17359
  • Age: 39
  • Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Re: Trump outrage of the day
« Reply #6558 on: January 07, 2021, 01:01:09 PM »
Who gives a fuck about impeachment?  Not Trump.

American GenX

  • Pencil Stache
  • ****
  • Posts: 698
Re: Trump outrage of the day
« Reply #6559 on: January 07, 2021, 01:02:14 PM »
Don't fuck with the Secret Service protection detail.

She earned this one 100%.

NSFW video: https://www.reddit.com/r/PublicFreakout/comments/ks8gtj/clearest_view_of_a_terrorist_attempting_to_breach/

I think this one is a bit more clear in terms of her behavior: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AZ9oThRuMVs&bpctr=1610041725

The shooting was unjustified.   I also notice there's an extreme bias in the media about this.

https://www.foxnews.com/media/mainstream-lawlessness-trump-dc-riots-inexcusable-unrest-police

The media went out of its way in 2020 to paint sometimes-violent protests across the nation as mostly "peaceful," but finally came around on Wednesday to the notion that mayhem and anarchy is always unacceptable – all it took was Trump supporters causing the chaos to spark a swift change of heart.

Anyway, glad Trump's days in office are dwindling.
« Last Edit: January 07, 2021, 01:04:05 PM by American GenX »

FIPurpose

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 1510
  • Location: WA
    • FI With Purpose
Re: Trump outrage of the day
« Reply #6560 on: January 07, 2021, 01:02:55 PM »
How is that precog? It's just regular cog. She is actively breaching the capital during a full session with a backpack on and was warned to stop.  That in and of itself warrants deadly force.

Hold on, do you know the rules of engagement for the Capitol Police?  I sure as hell don't.  I don't know if it was a good shooting or not.  I made no claims about the shooting.  You say terrorist, but I see no evidence she was going to harm anyone.  (I certainly see evidence she was fucking nuts).

I'm confused, you thought all these people stormed the capitol to what? Have a picnic?

I don't know, to do exactly what they did???  Stop the session, destroy property, make fools of themselves, get on TV, express support for Trump, express outrage about the election results.  Those are things they DID.  So, that's what I think they stormed the Capitol to do.  How is that crazy?

Ok what if they were able to successfully steal the elector ballot boxes that stored the certified votes? What if they managed to kidnap or murder a member of congress?  What if someone simply went into a member's office and stole state secrets that then led to the endangerment of Americans' lives at home or abroad?

Breaking and entering of this magnitude is a felony. Breaking and entering the Capitol Building in an unlawful manner is a felony. I wouldn't be surprised if 50-100 people from this riot are sent to jail. But they may be trying to keep the names under wrap in order to prevent Trump from pardoning them.

ixtap

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 2916
Re: Trump outrage of the day
« Reply #6561 on: January 07, 2021, 01:04:31 PM »
Pelosi has told Pence that if he doesn't invoke the 25th in a day, she is prepared to move forward with impeachment. 25th is clearly the cleanest option for all involved, sycophants aside.

Why do you think the 25th is cleaner?

On the surface, I prefer barring him from future office with impeach and remove, but I admit I am not familiar with the finer points.

bacchi

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 5445
Re: Trump outrage of the day
« Reply #6562 on: January 07, 2021, 01:05:30 PM »
Who gives a fuck about impeachment?  Not Trump.

There's an assumption that there's a greater than average chance that he would get the boot. There's a new Senate and some of the Republicans with a spine, like Romney, would vote to remove from office.

John Galt incarnate!

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 2034
  • Location: On Cloud Nine
Re: Trump outrage of the day
« Reply #6563 on: January 07, 2021, 01:07:29 PM »


The capitol police were supposed to know that she just had a teddy bear in her backpack when attempting to break into the chamber where they were holding the last line of defense!



If I were on duty "possible suicide bomber" would come to mind the instant I saw she was wearing a backpack.

Montecarlo

  • Pencil Stache
  • ****
  • Posts: 671
Re: Trump outrage of the day
« Reply #6564 on: January 07, 2021, 01:07:42 PM »
Don't fuck with the Secret Service protection detail.

She earned this one 100%.

NSFW video: https://www.reddit.com/r/PublicFreakout/comments/ks8gtj/clearest_view_of_a_terrorist_attempting_to_breach/

I think this one is a bit more clear in terms of her behavior: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AZ9oThRuMVs&bpctr=1610041725

The shooting was unjustified.   I also notice there's an extreme bias in the media about this.


I don't necessarily agree with this.  I was on the fence, but someone mentioned the backpack, and I agree.  The police do have an obligation to protect, and no telling what she had in that backpack.  Normally I would advocate the police giving the citizenry the benefit of the doubt, like don't shoot lawfully armed homeowners.  But this is a much different scenario.  None of us know what the guidelines are for deadly force for the Capitol Police, so it's all speculation really.

FIPurpose

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 1510
  • Location: WA
    • FI With Purpose
Re: Trump outrage of the day
« Reply #6565 on: January 07, 2021, 01:08:06 PM »
Pelosi has told Pence that if he doesn't invoke the 25th in a day, she is prepared to move forward with impeachment. 25th is clearly the cleanest option for all involved, sycophants aside.

Why do you think the 25th is cleaner?

On the surface, I prefer barring him from future office with impeach and remove, but I admit I am not familiar with the finer points.

The 25th amendment doesn't require a trial, gathering of evidence, and committee hearings for deposition by the House and Senate which would run multiple days very likely. The 25th amendment instead only requires a written note from the VP and Cabinet to depose the President. The President can challenge it and then congress can override the challenge with a 2/3 vote.

Montecarlo

  • Pencil Stache
  • ****
  • Posts: 671
Re: Trump outrage of the day
« Reply #6566 on: January 07, 2021, 01:09:08 PM »
Ok what if they were able to successfully steal the elector ballot boxes that stored the certified votes? What if they managed to kidnap or murder a member of congress?  What if someone simply went into a member's office and stole state secrets that then led to the endangerment of Americans' lives at home or abroad?

Breaking and entering of this magnitude is a felony. Breaking and entering the Capitol Building in an unlawful manner is a felony. I wouldn't be surprised if 50-100 people from this riot are sent to jail. But they may be trying to keep the names under wrap in order to prevent Trump from pardoning them.

I'm not sure why you think I would disagree with any of that, but the tone of your voice suggests you expect me to.

Kris

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 5880
Re: Trump outrage of the day
« Reply #6567 on: January 07, 2021, 01:09:56 PM »
Don't fuck with the Secret Service protection detail.

She earned this one 100%.

NSFW video: https://www.reddit.com/r/PublicFreakout/comments/ks8gtj/clearest_view_of_a_terrorist_attempting_to_breach/

I think this one is a bit more clear in terms of her behavior: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AZ9oThRuMVs&bpctr=1610041725

Wow, that reddit video is brutal.

No kidding.

She deserved it, though. RIP.

bacchi

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 5445
Re: Trump outrage of the day
« Reply #6568 on: January 07, 2021, 01:10:22 PM »
Don't fuck with the Secret Service protection detail.

She earned this one 100%.

NSFW video: https://www.reddit.com/r/PublicFreakout/comments/ks8gtj/clearest_view_of_a_terrorist_attempting_to_breach/

I think this one is a bit more clear in terms of her behavior: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AZ9oThRuMVs&bpctr=1610041725

The shooting was unjustified.   I also notice there's an extreme bias in the media about this.


I don't necessarily agree with this.  I was on the fence, but someone mentioned the backpack, and I agree.  The police do have an obligation to protect, and no telling what she had in that backpack.  Normally I would advocate the police giving the citizenry the benefit of the doubt, like don't shoot lawfully armed homeowners.  But this is a much different scenario.  None of us know what the guidelines are for deadly force for the Capitol Police, so it's all speculation really.

It looks like Secret Service, given the suit and the single shot, which is an entirely different level. They're meant to do one thing and one thing only: protect their charge(s).

Two things: "protecting the nation's leaders and safeguarding the financial and critical infrastructure of the United States."
« Last Edit: January 07, 2021, 01:13:38 PM by bacchi »

FIPurpose

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 1510
  • Location: WA
    • FI With Purpose
Re: Trump outrage of the day
« Reply #6569 on: January 07, 2021, 01:11:16 PM »
Pelosi has told Pence that if he doesn't invoke the 25th in a day, she is prepared to move forward with impeachment. 25th is clearly the cleanest option for all involved, sycophants aside.

Why do you think the 25th is cleaner?

On the surface, I prefer barring him from future office with impeach and remove, but I admit I am not familiar with the finer points.

The 25th amendment doesn't require a trial, gathering of evidence, and committee hearings for deposition by the House and Senate which would run multiple days very likely. The 25th amendment instead only requires a written note from the VP and Cabinet to depose the President. The President can challenge it and then congress can override the challenge with a 2/3 vote.

Of course this would require about 1/3 of the Republicans to go along with it. At this point, you may see it possible. With Pence signing onto it, there may be enough votes to do it. (Plus it's easier politically for GOP members to sign on if it comes from the GOP rather than the House)

dang1

  • Stubble
  • **
  • Posts: 232
Re: Trump outrage of the day
« Reply #6570 on: January 07, 2021, 01:12:00 PM »
"When the looting starts, the shooting starts"

Glenstache

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 2854
  • Location: Seattle!
  • Target FI date 2027 (maybe?)
Re: Trump outrage of the day
« Reply #6571 on: January 07, 2021, 01:13:01 PM »
Pelosi has told Pence that if he doesn't invoke the 25th in a day, she is prepared to move forward with impeachment. 25th is clearly the cleanest option for all involved, sycophants aside.

Why do you think the 25th is cleaner?

On the surface, I prefer barring him from future office with impeach and remove, but I admit I am not familiar with the finer points.
I believe it is cleaner because it is faster and more clear that it is about unacceptable behavior (as opposed to political retribution) if it is lead by Pence.

Montecarlo

  • Pencil Stache
  • ****
  • Posts: 671
Re: Trump outrage of the day
« Reply #6572 on: January 07, 2021, 01:13:10 PM »
It looks like Secret Service, given the suit and the single shot, which is an entirely different level. They're meant to do one thing and one thing only: protect their charge(s).

News said plain clothed Capitol Police, but it may be some times before the fog of war is cleared up.

ixtap

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 2916
Re: Trump outrage of the day
« Reply #6573 on: January 07, 2021, 01:13:35 PM »
Don't fuck with the Secret Service protection detail.

She earned this one 100%.

NSFW video: https://www.reddit.com/r/PublicFreakout/comments/ks8gtj/clearest_view_of_a_terrorist_attempting_to_breach/

I think this one is a bit more clear in terms of her behavior: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AZ9oThRuMVs&bpctr=1610041725

The shooting was unjustified.   I also notice there's an extreme bias in the media about this.


I don't necessarily agree with this.  I was on the fence, but someone mentioned the backpack, and I agree.  The police do have an obligation to protect, and no telling what she had in that backpack.  Normally I would advocate the police giving the citizenry the benefit of the doubt, like don't shoot lawfully armed homeowners.  But this is a much different scenario.  None of us know what the guidelines are for deadly force for the Capitol Police, so it's all speculation really.

It looks like Secret Service, given the suit and the single shot, which is an entirely different level. They're meant to do one thing and one thing only: protect their charge(s).

The Capitol Police have taken responsibility, putting the officer in question on suspension for the duration of the investigation.

bacchi

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 5445
Re: Trump outrage of the day
« Reply #6574 on: January 07, 2021, 01:15:12 PM »
Don't fuck with the Secret Service protection detail.

She earned this one 100%.

NSFW video: https://www.reddit.com/r/PublicFreakout/comments/ks8gtj/clearest_view_of_a_terrorist_attempting_to_breach/

I think this one is a bit more clear in terms of her behavior: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AZ9oThRuMVs&bpctr=1610041725

The shooting was unjustified.   I also notice there's an extreme bias in the media about this.


I don't necessarily agree with this.  I was on the fence, but someone mentioned the backpack, and I agree.  The police do have an obligation to protect, and no telling what she had in that backpack.  Normally I would advocate the police giving the citizenry the benefit of the doubt, like don't shoot lawfully armed homeowners.  But this is a much different scenario.  None of us know what the guidelines are for deadly force for the Capitol Police, so it's all speculation really.

It looks like Secret Service, given the suit and the single shot, which is an entirely different level. They're meant to do one thing and one thing only: protect their charge(s).

The Capitol Police have taken responsibility, putting the officer in question on suspension for the duration of the investigation.

Well, damn. He's a good shot for a cop.

charis

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 2186
Re: Trump outrage of the day
« Reply #6575 on: January 07, 2021, 01:16:02 PM »
Pelosi has told Pence that if he doesn't invoke the 25th in a day, she is prepared to move forward with impeachment. 25th is clearly the cleanest option for all involved, sycophants aside.

Why do you think the 25th is cleaner?

On the surface, I prefer barring him from future office with impeach and remove, but I admit I am not familiar with the finer points.

The 25th amendment doesn't require a trial, gathering of evidence, and committee hearings for deposition by the House and Senate which would run multiple days very likely. The 25th amendment instead only requires a written note from the VP and Cabinet to depose the President. The President can challenge it and then congress can override the challenge with a 2/3 vote.

Does the issue of him trying to pardon himself come into play with either option?

dividendman

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 1370
  • Age: 38

Glenstache

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 2854
  • Location: Seattle!
  • Target FI date 2027 (maybe?)
Re: Trump outrage of the day
« Reply #6577 on: January 07, 2021, 01:18:26 PM »
Pelosi has told Pence that if he doesn't invoke the 25th in a day, she is prepared to move forward with impeachment. 25th is clearly the cleanest option for all involved, sycophants aside.

Why do you think the 25th is cleaner?

On the surface, I prefer barring him from future office with impeach and remove, but I admit I am not familiar with the finer points.

The 25th amendment doesn't require a trial, gathering of evidence, and committee hearings for deposition by the House and Senate which would run multiple days very likely. The 25th amendment instead only requires a written note from the VP and Cabinet to depose the President. The President can challenge it and then congress can override the challenge with a 2/3 vote.

Does the issue of him trying to pardon himself come into play with either option?
A self-pardon would not matter, and could actually make things worse for Trump. The requirement is that either the cabinet (25th) or congress (impeachment) deems him unfit for office. Criminal liability is not explicitly required.

GuitarStv

  • Senior Mustachian
  • ********
  • Posts: 17359
  • Age: 39
  • Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Re: Trump outrage of the day
« Reply #6578 on: January 07, 2021, 01:19:01 PM »
This is fucking insane.  Trump, the insurrection, the terrorist apologists in this thread.

It speaks to the lack of true patriotism in the US today. Trying to stop the formal choosing of a President is just an afternoon's lark, ya know?

You're acting as if there are only two ways to respond:

Complete nonchalance to the point of complicity
OR
Condemn them all as murderous terrorists

Isn't there room for something in between?

I'm curious.  What is the in-between response that you're advocating?

I certainly don't see all the protestors as murderous terrorists.  There were thousands of people who stayed outside whom (I assume) remained peaceful . . . but I can only see the people who violently broke into the capitol building as doing something very bad.

If a group kicked down the door to your home and tried to smash their way into a room you barricade yourself into . . . and you shot them to death, no jury in the US would convict you of unlawful action.  It's unreasonable to believe that they are not there to hurt someone.

Is the problem with the use of the inflammatory words 'murderous' and 'terrorist'?  As far as the use of the word 'terrorist', it seems to fit pretty well:
Terrorist - a person who uses unlawful violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.
Violence and intimidation were used against civilians for political aims by the people who boke into the capitol.

How about murderous?
Murderous - capable of or intending to murder; dangerously violent.
I don't think that violently breaking into a building after issuing threats outside against people who were in the building can be viewed in any other way.

dividendman

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 1370
  • Age: 38
Re: Trump outrage of the day
« Reply #6579 on: January 07, 2021, 01:20:31 PM »
I just realized since these are all federal crimes Trump can pardon all of these insurrectionists...

Wait... if they kill people in DC, it's all federal right? Can Trump literally kill someone in DC then pardon himself? You yanks need to get rid of this ridiculous pardon power.

Glenstache

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 2854
  • Location: Seattle!
  • Target FI date 2027 (maybe?)
Re: Trump outrage of the day
« Reply #6580 on: January 07, 2021, 01:21:23 PM »

sherr

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 1543
  • Age: 35
  • Location: North Carolina, USA
Re: Trump outrage of the day
« Reply #6581 on: January 07, 2021, 01:27:49 PM »
The shooting was unjustified.

A rioter attempts to force their way through barricades into the room where the VP is, and the shooting is unjustified? Wooooow.

John Galt incarnate!

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 2034
  • Location: On Cloud Nine
Re: Trump outrage of the day
« Reply #6582 on: January 07, 2021, 01:28:30 PM »
Pelosi has told Pence that if he doesn't invoke the 25th in a day, she is prepared to move forward with impeachment. 25th is clearly the cleanest option for all involved, sycophants aside.

Why do you think the 25th is cleaner?

On the surface, I prefer barring him from future office with impeach and remove, but I admit I am not familiar with the finer points.

Professor Rory Little said in effect that invoking the 25th Amendment is too complicated.

He also made a statement similar to what I've posted about Congress' power to impeach Trump forthwith.

When he said this, it was something to the effect   that Trump could be impeached today or tomorrow.


John Galt incarnate!

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 2034
  • Location: On Cloud Nine
Re: Trump outrage of the day
« Reply #6583 on: January 07, 2021, 01:45:48 PM »
Can Trump literally kill someone in DC then pardon himself? You yanks need to get rid of this ridiculous pardon power.

The Supreme Court has never adjudicated the issue of a presidential self-pardon.

If the issue of a presidential self-pardon ever comes before the Supreme Court I predict a 9-0 ruling against self-pardon.

Due to human nature, a party that has a central self-interest in the outcome of their case is presumed incapable of scrupulously impartial  judgment, one of the requisites of equitable adjudication.

A presidential  power of self-pardon invites egregious, capricious  law-breaking and autocratic subversion of justice.



"Nemo judex in causa sua/nemo judex in sua causa is a Latin phrase that means, literally, 'no-one is judge in his own cause.'It is a principle of natural justice that no person can judge a case in which they have an interest."

Just Joe

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 4518
  • Age: 125
  • Location: Just past the red barn on the left.
  • Here to learn.
Re: Trump outrage of the day
« Reply #6584 on: January 07, 2021, 01:48:37 PM »
The person who was shot was crawling through a window that led to where the Vice President and the Speaker were. Number 2 and 3 in power in the country. She was told repeatedly to stop, to stand down.

She was attempting to harm government officials, so she was shot. It's sad that someone died but 100% completely justified.

Wild speculation.  No weapons were found on her.

Does a security person wait to see what the person has in their backpack? I'll remind you of the Nashville Christmas Day bomber. Clearly some of these Trump supporters are very suspect.

Just Joe

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 4518
  • Age: 125
  • Location: Just past the red barn on the left.
  • Here to learn.
Re: Trump outrage of the day
« Reply #6585 on: January 07, 2021, 01:52:00 PM »
If she was ex-military she was very possibly trained to kill without weapons.  Would you want to chance the VP's life that she wasn't?

rofl.  okay, you guys got me.  She was definitely trying to kill Pence with her bare hands, solo, taking on the Capitol Police and the Secret Service.  You guys got me, I was just trolling.

Friend just told me about a Twitter exchange between VP Harris and the lady who was shot. Lady sounded very unhinged.

JLee

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 6272
Re: Trump outrage of the day
« Reply #6586 on: January 07, 2021, 01:54:42 PM »
The person who was shot was crawling through a window that led to where the Vice President and the Speaker were. Number 2 and 3 in power in the country. She was told repeatedly to stop, to stand down.

She was attempting to harm government officials, so she was shot. It's sad that someone died but 100% completely justified.

Wild speculation.  No weapons were found on her.

Does a security person wait to see what the person has in their backpack? I'll remind you of the Nashville Christmas Day bomber. Clearly some of these Trump supporters are very suspect.

If this was a BLM protest and someone rushed Trump or Pence with a backpack, after breaking into the Capitol building with a horde of others, the Trump supporters would be screaming that they all should've been shot as soon as they set foot inside...

Glenstache

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 2854
  • Location: Seattle!
  • Target FI date 2027 (maybe?)
Re: Trump outrage of the day
« Reply #6587 on: January 07, 2021, 01:59:11 PM »
The person who was shot was crawling through a window that led to where the Vice President and the Speaker were. Number 2 and 3 in power in the country. She was told repeatedly to stop, to stand down.

She was attempting to harm government officials, so she was shot. It's sad that someone died but 100% completely justified.

Wild speculation.  No weapons were found on her.

Does a security person wait to see what the person has in their backpack? I'll remind you of the Nashville Christmas Day bomber. Clearly some of these Trump supporters are very suspect.

If this was a BLM protest and someone rushed Trump or Pence with a backpack, after breaking into the Capitol building with a horde of others, the Trump supporters would be screaming that they all should've been shot as soon as they set foot inside...
Seems a lot of them would also appreciate the "stand your ground" element of it.

Details will certainly become more clear soon, and there will also probably be a lot of spin as well. That the situation came to pass that this, and all the other bullshit of Jan6 came to pass is heartbreaking and disturbing.

Barbaebigode

  • Stubble
  • **
  • Posts: 201
Re: Trump outrage of the day
« Reply #6588 on: January 07, 2021, 02:07:32 PM »
Can Trump literally kill someone in DC then pardon himself? You yanks need to get rid of this ridiculous pardon power.

The Supreme Court has never adjudicated the issue of a presidential self-pardon.

If the issue of a presidential self-pardon ever comes before the Supreme Court I predict a 9-0 ruling against self-pardon.

Due to human nature, a party that has a central self-interest in the outcome of their case is presumed incapable of scrupulously impartial  judgment, one of the requisites of equitable adjudication.

A presidential  power of self-pardon invites egregious, capricious  law-breaking and autocratic subversion of justice.



"Nemo judex in causa sua/nemo judex in sua causa is a Latin phrase that means, literally, 'no-one is judge in his own cause.'It is a principle of natural justice that no person can judge a case in which they have an interest."

And what about a VP pardoning a President that just resigned? Is he considered impartial?

Glenstache

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 2854
  • Location: Seattle!
  • Target FI date 2027 (maybe?)
Re: Trump outrage of the day
« Reply #6589 on: January 07, 2021, 02:11:12 PM »
Can Trump literally kill someone in DC then pardon himself? You yanks need to get rid of this ridiculous pardon power.

The Supreme Court has never adjudicated the issue of a presidential self-pardon.

If the issue of a presidential self-pardon ever comes before the Supreme Court I predict a 9-0 ruling against self-pardon.

Due to human nature, a party that has a central self-interest in the outcome of their case is presumed incapable of scrupulously impartial  judgment, one of the requisites of equitable adjudication.

A presidential  power of self-pardon invites egregious, capricious  law-breaking and autocratic subversion of justice.



"Nemo judex in causa sua/nemo judex in sua causa is a Latin phrase that means, literally, 'no-one is judge in his own cause.'It is a principle of natural justice that no person can judge a case in which they have an interest."

And what about a VP pardoning a President that just resigned? Is he considered impartial?
That is a possibility. The precedent is Ford pardoning Nixon in order to let the country move on. Given how much more egregious Trump has been than Nixon, I'm pretty sure that would not be taken as well. Regardless, the pardon would only apply to federal crimes, and Trump has massive legal liability at the state level.

Montecarlo

  • Pencil Stache
  • ****
  • Posts: 671
Re: Trump outrage of the day
« Reply #6590 on: January 07, 2021, 02:17:38 PM »
Does a security person wait to see what the person has in their backpack? I'll remind you of the Nashville Christmas Day bomber. Clearly some of these Trump supporters are very suspect.

Only one person on here said the "security person" shouldn't have shot her.  That person was not me.

bacchi

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 5445
Re: Trump outrage of the day
« Reply #6591 on: January 07, 2021, 02:31:43 PM »
Can Trump literally kill someone in DC then pardon himself? You yanks need to get rid of this ridiculous pardon power.

The Supreme Court has never adjudicated the issue of a presidential self-pardon.

If the issue of a presidential self-pardon ever comes before the Supreme Court I predict a 9-0 ruling against self-pardon.

Due to human nature, a party that has a central self-interest in the outcome of their case is presumed incapable of scrupulously impartial  judgment, one of the requisites of equitable adjudication.

A presidential  power of self-pardon invites egregious, capricious  law-breaking and autocratic subversion of justice.



"Nemo judex in causa sua/nemo judex in sua causa is a Latin phrase that means, literally, 'no-one is judge in his own cause.'It is a principle of natural justice that no person can judge a case in which they have an interest."

And what about a VP pardoning a President that just resigned? Is he considered impartial?
That is a possibility. The precedent is Ford pardoning Nixon in order to let the country move on. Given how much more egregious Trump has been than Nixon, I'm pretty sure that would not be taken as well. Regardless, the pardon would only apply to federal crimes, and Trump has massive legal liability at the state level.

Considering how Trump threw Pence under the bus, and that Pence's family was also in the Capitol building, and that there were chants of "Where's Mike Pence?" from the Trump mob, I'd expect Pence to not pardon Trump.

sherr

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 1543
  • Age: 35
  • Location: North Carolina, USA
Re: Trump outrage of the day
« Reply #6592 on: January 07, 2021, 02:34:34 PM »
Considering how Trump threw Pence under the bus, and that Pence's family was also in the Capitol building, and that there were chants of "Where's Mike Pence?" from the Trump mob, I'd expect Pence to not pardon Trump.

Uh, yeeaaaaah, that's not the only thing about Pence they were shouting.

Edit: I guess I should actually say it with words, because I hate it when people just throw a link up too. They're shouting "Hang Mike Pence!" very very clearly. I'm assuming that the running through the building looking for Pence specifically happened after this because here they're still at the door, not yet inside. Draw your own conclusions.
« Last Edit: January 07, 2021, 02:40:55 PM by sherr »

bacchi

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 5445
Re: Trump outrage of the day
« Reply #6593 on: January 07, 2021, 02:39:25 PM »
Considering how Trump threw Pence under the bus, and that Pence's family was also in the Capitol building, and that there were chants of "Where's Mike Pence?" from the Trump mob, I'd expect Pence to not pardon Trump.

Uh, yeeaaaaah, that's not the only thing about Pence they were shouting.

That's not evidence they wanted to harm the VP. Until he's on the gallows they set up in front of the Capitol, we can't assume intent. </s>


Thanks. Hadn't seen/heard that video.

ixtap

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 2916
Re: Trump outrage of the day
« Reply #6594 on: January 07, 2021, 02:45:53 PM »
Pelosi has told Pence that if he doesn't invoke the 25th in a day, she is prepared to move forward with impeachment. 25th is clearly the cleanest option for all involved, sycophants aside.

Why do you think the 25th is cleaner?

On the surface, I prefer barring him from future office with impeach and remove, but I admit I am not familiar with the finer points.

The 25th amendment doesn't require a trial, gathering of evidence, and committee hearings for deposition by the House and Senate which would run multiple days very likely. The 25th amendment instead only requires a written note from the VP and Cabinet to depose the President. The President can challenge it and then congress can override the challenge with a 2/3 vote.

To me the advantage is that the impetus would come from primarily Republicans. As of the last list I saw, only one Republican has signed on to impeach and remove. How is this a partisan issue?!

sherr

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 1543
  • Age: 35
  • Location: North Carolina, USA
Re: Trump outrage of the day
« Reply #6595 on: January 07, 2021, 02:47:39 PM »
As of the last list I saw, only one Republican has signed on to impeach and remove. How is this a partisan issue?!

Simple. Because the Republican base loves Trump, and there is a very very large chance that impeaching and removing him would end their career.

Just Joe

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 4518
  • Age: 125
  • Location: Just past the red barn on the left.
  • Here to learn.
Re: Trump outrage of the day
« Reply #6596 on: January 07, 2021, 02:54:33 PM »
Does a security person wait to see what the person has in their backpack? I'll remind you of the Nashville Christmas Day bomber. Clearly some of these Trump supporters are very suspect.

Only one person on here said the "security person" shouldn't have shot her.  That person was not me.

Wasn't me either. Just want to make that extra clear. It was unfortunate but he he did what he was ordered to do. Frankly I think the protesters should have never been allowed in the building based on their behavior, their words, and things like the gallows being constructed in front of the building.

Based on their words - they were a serious threat.

John Galt incarnate!

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 2034
  • Location: On Cloud Nine
Re: Trump outrage of the day
« Reply #6597 on: January 07, 2021, 03:08:31 PM »
Can Trump literally kill someone in DC then pardon himself? You yanks need to get rid of this ridiculous pardon power.

The Supreme Court has never adjudicated the issue of a presidential self-pardon.

If the issue of a presidential self-pardon ever comes before the Supreme Court I predict a 9-0 ruling against self-pardon.

Due to human nature, a party that has a central self-interest in the outcome of their case is presumed incapable of scrupulously impartial  judgment, one of the requisites of equitable adjudication.

A presidential  power of self-pardon invites egregious, capricious  law-breaking and autocratic subversion of justice.



"Nemo judex in causa sua/nemo judex in sua causa is a Latin phrase that means, literally, 'no-one is judge in his own cause.'It is a principle of natural justice that no person can judge a case in which they have an interest."

And what about a VP pardoning a President that just resigned? Is he considered impartial?
That is a possibility. The precedent is Ford pardoning Nixon in order to let the country move on. Given how much more egregious Trump has been than Nixon, I'm pretty sure that would not be taken as well.

I fully concur.

Trump is an unhinged,  poisonous anticonstitutionalist inimical to America's institutions.

Trump  is an evil, malicious   degenerate,  without question the worst president ever.




A  pardonee can never escape  opprobrium for their misdeed(s) because  a pardon "carries an imputation of guilt; acceptance a confession of it."

This informed Ford's rationale of Nixon's pardon.

Long after he pardoned Nixon  in his wallet Ford carried a section of the Burdick opinion.







BURDICK v. UNITED STATES
(1915)

This brings us to the differences between legislative immunity and a pardon. They are substantial.  the latter carries an imputation of guilt; acceptance a confession of it. The former has no such imputation or confession. It is tantamount to the silence of the witness. It is noncommittal. It is the unobtrusive act of the law given protection against a sinister use of his testimony, not like a pardon, requiring him to confess his guilt in order to avoid a conviction of it.
« Last Edit: January 07, 2021, 03:13:11 PM by John Galt incarnate! »

Watchmaker

  • Pencil Stache
  • ****
  • Posts: 875
Re: Trump outrage of the day
« Reply #6598 on: January 07, 2021, 03:17:52 PM »
Simple. Because the Republican base loves Trump, and there is a very very large chance that impeaching and removing him would end their career.

Someone in the session last night (one of the senators, I'm pretty sure) had a line along the lines of: some people are willing to lay down their lives to protect democracy, and we're not even willing to lose our jobs to do the same. I wish I remembered who it was.

The shooting was unjustified.

Honestly, I'm just quoting this so I can find it later. I can't even imagine the rationale for that take.

WhiteTrashCash

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 1708
Re: Trump outrage of the day
« Reply #6599 on: January 07, 2021, 03:21:23 PM »
Pelosi has told Pence that if he doesn't invoke the 25th in a day, she is prepared to move forward with impeachment. 25th is clearly the cleanest option for all involved, sycophants aside.

Why do you think the 25th is cleaner?

On the surface, I prefer barring him from future office with impeach and remove, but I admit I am not familiar with the finer points.

The 25th amendment doesn't require a trial, gathering of evidence, and committee hearings for deposition by the House and Senate which would run multiple days very likely. The 25th amendment instead only requires a written note from the VP and Cabinet to depose the President. The President can challenge it and then congress can override the challenge with a 2/3 vote.

To me the advantage is that the impetus would come from primarily Republicans. As of the last list I saw, only one Republican has signed on to impeach and remove. How is this a partisan issue?!

It’s because the Republicans want the MAGA terrorists’ votes, even though the MAGA terrorists came to murder them yesterday. They have no spines at all.