It could be misleading as I'm not one to follow the news as closely as others. I read your link. From the link:
"Will anything come of this? In theory, the House could impose disciplinary measures, but Rep. Gabbard’s trip doesn’t seem to be the type of conduct that warrants anything close to a severe response. Yes, she circumvented congressional leadership. And yes, she met with a notorious war criminal. But she appears to have been driven by genuine concern about U.S. policy and the conditions in Syria, rather than self-aggrandizement or other improper motives. The Committee on Standards of Official Conduct might conceivably issue a letter of reproval or informally communicate an objection, but it’s hard to envision much more than that."
It doesn't bother me that she had a talk with a foreign leader. It may be a good thing that she had an independent talk. It may be a bad thing. I don't know.
I don't think she is going to get very far in the Presidential primaries, but I like the anti war message. I've talked to ex military people who have been to the middle east and they seem to be as confused about why we are there as I am.
How about Joe, the Democratic front-runner?
He doesn't have time to explain his health care plan.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/joe-biden-healthcare-2020-campaign-bernie-sanders-elizabeth-warren-a8898926.htmlMaybe it will be the same "terrific" one our president spoke of.
The guy has been in the political arena a long time. Where's the man with the plan?