For me, Net Neutrality is a really tough issue to decide on. I'm generally very anti-regulation, especially on a federal (i.e. "one-size-fits-none") level, but I recognize that there are edge cases where regulation is needed. In this case, many ISPs are monopolies or duopolies in their area, often because they have demanded (and received) exclusivity from the local government. In that way, they very much *do* need to be regulated like a utility. Also, because of their position as a mono/duopoly, and because the cable companies especially have other services tied to it, there's a tendency to abuse that monopoly position.
If the market were truly open and competitive, I'd be all against Net Neutrality. But it's not, and so I'm not.
I find it especially egregious that ISPs are demanding payments from the likes of Netflix, when their customers are already paying for that same data. That, to me, is slimy.
At the same time, I see the value in being able to treat different traffic differently--give lower latency to packets associated with online FPS's, allow larger buffers for video streaming, give higher priority to, say, business-critical traffic. But I see that as more of a hypothetical, future benefit.