Where did people get this notion that the Constitution and our Founding Fathers gave them the right to do whatever the F__ they want. This seems to be a pervasive belief, particularly in some conservative and libertarian circles.
There is no Right enshrined in the constitution so absolute that reasonable limitations cannot be placed upon it, and we have 240 years of case law and legislation to prove it.
THe people who shout “…but Freedom!” Seem to be the ones who understand our government the least.
Where does the notion originate? From the the people and the moral ideologies that birthed the founding fathers - especially and importantly Locke (although many others are invoked in the dicourse). The modern invocation of the Constitution/rights is a mild perversion of Locke's philosophy on an
individual's (shit who am I kidding - a white man's) right to property, religious freedom, etc.
The extrapolation between Locke and the Constitution is drawn through the actions of the revolution and more or less has precipitated as the notion that because our country was founded in direct opposition to the Crown and to establish the rights of the
individual white man to do as he sees fit, his government only exists in the most idealistic sense to provide his individual property and liberty protection from enemies.
This narrow and selective interpretation of the genesis of the Constitution and the United States as we know it today allows for a platform from which individual liberty is greater than anything other than God himself. Taking that view allows one to selectively ignore and sweep under the rug any moral conundrums and ideological inconsistencies that would perverse the view that the
individual white man and personal property is anything other than the highest good.
Now, I'm glossing over way too much, and I'm probably making one or two generalizations that I shouldn't, but some of the people I graduated with spent 8 years studying this exact interpretation of the birth of our nation and I only took the minimum required courses on the topic. For reference, I went to an incredibly conservative college and have very mixed feelings about spending time there.
I also want to provide a post-commentary that I do think there is plenty of food for thought in Locke and many of his ideas ain't all that bad, but again, he and what his thoughts led to are the moral foundation that the "But my rights" argument is built from.