Poll

Brett Kavanaguh: Yay or Nay?

Yay!
Nay!
Who cares? The SCOTUS doesn't matter anyways.

Author Topic: Brett Kavanaguh: Yay or Nay?  (Read 72593 times)

Unique User

  • Pencil Stache
  • ****
  • Posts: 524
Re: Brett Kavanaguh: Yay or Nay?
« Reply #1700 on: October 19, 2018, 08:35:36 AM »
For every cause, people pick and choose the parts of the Bible to listen to.  Prosperity gospel is not alone in this.

Yep. Like Pat Robertson saying “thou shalt not kill” is trumped by “totally okay to overlook this one if you’re getting 100 billion in arms sales from the murderers.”

http://deadstate.org/pat-robertson-defends-the-saudis-again-not-worth-losing-100-billion-in-arms-sales-over-a-murdered-journalist/

Pat Robertson also said that  Trump’s best course of action after the indictments against his former campaign staffers is to issue a “blanket pardon” to anyone indicted in connection with the investigations into Russia and shut down Robert Mueller’s “tainted” special counsel investigation.  He is also a past president of the Council for National Policy.  I used to make fun of conspiracy theorists, still do, but these people all have weird interconnections that freak me out. 

partgypsy

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 2438
Re: Brett Kavanaguh: Yay or Nay?
« Reply #1701 on: October 19, 2018, 10:28:45 AM »
This thread is officially depressing me again. : /

Glenstache

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 2071
  • Age: 186
  • Location: Seattle!
  • Target FI date 2027 (maybe?)
Re: Brett Kavanaguh: Yay or Nay?
« Reply #1702 on: October 19, 2018, 11:04:05 AM »
This thread is officially depressing me again. : /
... especially if the blanket pardon were to make it to SCOTUS and Kavanaugh, who likes executive power, were to be in a deciding position?

talltexan

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 1988
Re: Brett Kavanaguh: Yay or Nay?
« Reply #1703 on: October 19, 2018, 11:59:56 AM »
For a few weeks, I did hope that the family separate at the border was going to wake up Evangelical Christians that maybe the price of Trump was not worth the incredible judges he was giving them.

Then Kennedy announced he was retiring. There was simply no way Evangelicals were going to let that get messed up. And now it seems as though Democrats' behavior during those hearings was outrageous enough that suddenly Trump isn't seeming so terrible through Evangelical eyes.

What would really drive the stake into the heart of Democrats would be having a mass shooting.

bacchi

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 3192
Re: Brett Kavanaguh: Yay or Nay?
« Reply #1704 on: October 19, 2018, 02:35:34 PM »
What would really drive the stake into the heart of Democrats would be having a mass shooting.

I don't think mass shootings move the needle anymore. They happen in suburban high schools in liberal cities and rural churches in conservative counties. It's apolitical.

SwordGuy

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 4478
  • Location: Fayetteville, NC
    • Flipping Fayetteville
Re: Brett Kavanaguh: Yay or Nay?
« Reply #1705 on: October 19, 2018, 10:07:52 PM »
I don't think that I can agree that both sides have a double standard though, and I'm very definitely not pretending it's not partisan.  Democrats allowed a vote on Clarence Thomas and even helped confirm him as mentioned in my last post.  Merrick Garland not only got zero votes from Republicans, he didn't even get a vote period.  Yet Republicans are the ones in the hearing whining about how the process shouldn't be politicized and Kavanaugh should be confirmed because he's "qualified".

Bork? Robert Bork?

I used to think that Bork got a bum deal.   That's what I heard from the conservative side.

Then I learned WHY Bork got hammered by the Democrats.

When Nixon started order people who were investigating him (over Watergate crimes and the resulting coverup) to be fired, Bork complied.  (Several people above him in the chain of command resigned rather than do so.)

In that manner, Bork actively impeded a criminal investigation into felonious conduct by the President and others.

He should have been raked over the coals for it.

Bork deserved what he got.


bacchi

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 3192
Re: Brett Kavanaguh: Yay or Nay?
« Reply #1706 on: October 20, 2018, 10:17:03 AM »
Look at that picture above ^^^^. Nixon is at the table. In polls, almost half of Republicans think he did nothing wrong.

(Unless the painter was making that exact point?)

John Galt incarnate!

  • Stubble
  • **
  • Posts: 126
Re: Brett Kavanaguh: Yay or Nay?
« Reply #1707 on: October 20, 2018, 10:29:35 AM »


Nobody is saying he isn't qualified in the legal sense. Many are saying that he is not appropriate in the moral, temperament, or partisan (as in, he is gratuitously partisan) sense.

With respect to temperament, Judge Kavanaugh did not acquit himself well, especially in the testy question (about drinking) he asked   Senator Klobuchar.

fuzzy math

  • Pencil Stache
  • ****
  • Posts: 638
  • Location: PNW ---> Midwest (for now)
Re: Brett Kavanaguh: Yay or Nay?
« Reply #1708 on: October 20, 2018, 08:21:31 PM »
Fuck Kansas. I bought groceries there once at a trader joes and the tax was 11%. ON FUCKING GROCERIES. Not like take out prepared meal groceries, but produce, meat, etc. I was so flabbergasted I made some overt ststements to the cashier who had to try to politely explain Brownbackism to me. Never again, Kansas. Talk about a regressive tax on the poor.

RetiredAt63

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 9467
  • Location: Eastern Ontario, Canada
Re: Brett Kavanaguh: Yay or Nay?
« Reply #1709 on: October 21, 2018, 07:23:00 AM »
Fuck Kansas. I bought groceries there once at a trader joes and the tax was 11%. ON FUCKING GROCERIES. Not like take out prepared meal groceries, but produce, meat, etc. I was so flabbergasted I made some overt ststements to the cashier who had to try to politely explain Brownbackism to me. Never again, Kansas. Talk about a regressive tax on the poor.

That just plain sucks.

DavidAnnArbor

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 1806
  • Age: 53
  • Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Re: Brett Kavanaguh: Yay or Nay?
« Reply #1710 on: October 21, 2018, 03:33:27 PM »
Fuck Kansas. I bought groceries there once at a trader joes and the tax was 11%. ON FUCKING GROCERIES. Not like take out prepared meal groceries, but produce, meat, etc. I was so flabbergasted I made some overt ststements to the cashier who had to try to politely explain Brownbackism to me. Never again, Kansas. Talk about a regressive tax on the poor.

Repellent Republican policies in practice.

Glenstache

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 2071
  • Age: 186
  • Location: Seattle!
  • Target FI date 2027 (maybe?)
Re: Brett Kavanaguh: Yay or Nay?
« Reply #1711 on: October 22, 2018, 10:04:21 AM »
Too soon?


ncornilsen

  • Pencil Stache
  • ****
  • Posts: 826
Re: Brett Kavanaguh: Yay or Nay?
« Reply #1712 on: October 23, 2018, 10:13:09 AM »
Fuck Kansas. I bought groceries there once at a trader joes and the tax was 11%. ON FUCKING GROCERIES. Not like take out prepared meal groceries, but produce, meat, etc. I was so flabbergasted I made some overt ststements to the cashier who had to try to politely explain Brownbackism to me. Never again, Kansas. Talk about a regressive tax on the poor.

Repellent Republican policies in practice.

In Oregon, democrats tried to instate a sales tax, er, I mean a "gross receipts" tax (a distinction without a difference) to plug the budget holes left by decades of catering to thier public employee union donors... and it would have applied to groceries. Now they oppose a bill designed specifically to prevent democrats from taxing groceries with such a tax. 

Repellent Leftist policies in practice.

I don't know the details of Brownback's fiscal policy (It sounds reckless and poorly considered), but you CANNOT call a sales tax on groceries an exclusively (repellent) republican policy, nor can you judge an entire tax scheme based on a single element.

Tom Bri

  • Pencil Stache
  • ****
  • Posts: 618
  • Location: Small Town, Flyover Country
  • More just cheap, than Mustachian
Re: Brett Kavanaguh: Yay or Nay?
« Reply #1713 on: October 29, 2018, 09:29:01 AM »

Kris

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 3402
Re: Brett Kavanaguh: Yay or Nay?
« Reply #1714 on: October 29, 2018, 09:40:43 AM »
https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2018/10/27/nothing_to_gain_kavanaugh_accusers_coffers_are_growing.html

Cashing in. Gotta pay for renovations on that beach house, doncha know.

FFS.

This article is just such garbage.

I'm embarrassed for you, Tom.

MasterStache

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 1775
Re: Brett Kavanaguh: Yay or Nay?
« Reply #1715 on: October 29, 2018, 10:05:19 AM »
https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2018/10/27/nothing_to_gain_kavanaugh_accusers_coffers_are_growing.html

Cashing in. Gotta pay for renovations on that beach house, doncha know.

FFS.

This article is just such garbage.

I'm embarrassed for you, Tom.

Don't feed the troll ( :

Kris

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 3402
Re: Brett Kavanaguh: Yay or Nay?
« Reply #1716 on: October 29, 2018, 10:18:05 AM »
https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2018/10/27/nothing_to_gain_kavanaugh_accusers_coffers_are_growing.html

Cashing in. Gotta pay for renovations on that beach house, doncha know.

FFS.

This article is just such garbage.

I'm embarrassed for you, Tom.

Don't feed the troll ( :

True. I forget who a lot of the trolls are. It just seems so pointless to spend time being one.

But I guess, if that's all you have going on...

dustinst22

  • Pencil Stache
  • ****
  • Posts: 577
  • Age: 40
  • Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Re: Brett Kavanaguh: Yay or Nay?
« Reply #1717 on: October 29, 2018, 10:41:18 AM »

JLee

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 5017

JLee

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 5017
Re: Brett Kavanaguh: Yay or Nay?
« Reply #1719 on: October 29, 2018, 12:10:49 PM »
https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2018/10/27/nothing_to_gain_kavanaugh_accusers_coffers_are_growing.html

Cashing in. Gotta pay for renovations on that beach house, doncha know.

Yup, saw this one coming.

Not sure what that has to do with anything.

Kavanaugh isn't far behind - https://www.gofundme.com/support-brett-kavanaugh

Nothing, other than illustrating how people who point out Ford's gofundme really don't like to talk about Kavanaugh's.

dustinst22

  • Pencil Stache
  • ****
  • Posts: 577
  • Age: 40
  • Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Re: Brett Kavanaguh: Yay or Nay?
« Reply #1720 on: October 29, 2018, 12:17:38 PM »


Nothing, other than illustrating how people who point out Ford's gofundme really don't like to talk about Kavanaugh's.

Because I don't think its relevant, he wasn't seeking attention to this matter obviously.  The opinion of some seems to be that Ford had a lot to gain.  Speculation is that this could net 10+M.  I'm cynical enough to know it's certainly a possibility.
« Last Edit: October 29, 2018, 12:19:36 PM by dustinst22 »

Kris

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 3402
Re: Brett Kavanaguh: Yay or Nay?
« Reply #1721 on: October 29, 2018, 12:41:58 PM »


Nothing, other than illustrating how people who point out Ford's gofundme really don't like to talk about Kavanaugh's.

Because I don't think its relevant, he wasn't seeking attention to this matter obviously.  The opinion of some seems to be that Ford had a lot to gain.  Speculation is that this could net 10+M.  I'm cynical enough to know it's certainly a possibility.

LOL. Ford has a lot to gain.

LOL.


JLee

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 5017
Re: Brett Kavanaguh: Yay or Nay?
« Reply #1722 on: October 29, 2018, 12:52:55 PM »


Nothing, other than illustrating how people who point out Ford's gofundme really don't like to talk about Kavanaugh's.

Because I don't think its relevant, he wasn't seeking attention to this matter obviously.  The opinion of some seems to be that Ford had a lot to gain.  Speculation is that this could net 10+M.  I'm cynical enough to know it's certainly a possibility.

LOL. Ford has a lot to gain.

LOL.

I don't know, you know I've heard from a lot of people, I mean people, you know people are saying, a lot of people are saying that Ford had a lot to gain. Credible people! 

MasterStache

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 1775
Re: Brett Kavanaguh: Yay or Nay?
« Reply #1723 on: October 29, 2018, 01:29:45 PM »


Nothing, other than illustrating how people who point out Ford's gofundme really don't like to talk about Kavanaugh's.

Because I don't think its relevant, he wasn't seeking attention to this matter obviously.  The opinion of some seems to be that Ford had a lot to gain.  Speculation is that this could net 10+M.  I'm cynical enough to know it's certainly a possibility.

LOL. Ford has a lot to gain.

LOL.

I don't know, you know I've heard from a lot of people, I mean people, you know people are saying, a lot of people are saying that Ford had a lot to gain. Credible people!

Next we'll be told that Clinton and Obama sent bombs to themselves and that jet fuel cannot melt steel.

Should have invested in tin foil hat stock. Doh!

marty998

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 5830
  • Location: Sydney, Oz
Re: Brett Kavanaguh: Yay or Nay?
« Reply #1724 on: October 29, 2018, 02:09:04 PM »
Question.

Has Kavanaugh made any decisions yet?

If I had been given a job to do and haven't done any work for three weeks I'd probably be fired by now.

dustinst22

  • Pencil Stache
  • ****
  • Posts: 577
  • Age: 40
  • Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Re: Brett Kavanaguh: Yay or Nay?
« Reply #1725 on: October 29, 2018, 02:37:55 PM »
This just in: Liberals say this isn't over, they're going to take this all the way to the Supreme Court

calimom

  • Pencil Stache
  • ****
  • Posts: 755
  • Location: Northern California
Re: Brett Kavanaguh: Yay or Nay?
« Reply #1726 on: October 29, 2018, 02:51:18 PM »
This just in: Liberals say this isn't over, they're going to take this all the way to the Supreme Court

Hilarious. If you change "liberals" to "libtards" you'll be redstate.com worthy.

Poundwise

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 1192

radram

  • Pencil Stache
  • ****
  • Posts: 812
Re: Brett Kavanaguh: Yay or Nay?
« Reply #1728 on: October 30, 2018, 06:26:03 AM »

MasterStache

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 1775
Re: Brett Kavanaguh: Yay or Nay?
« Reply #1729 on: October 30, 2018, 09:09:12 AM »
Next we'll be told that Clinton and Obama sent bombs to themselves ...
Someone told this guy already:
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/trump-supporter-says-hillary-and-obama-probably-sent-bombs-to-themselves_us_5bd4969de4b0d38b58840c62

Yep, precisely why I included it with other nonsensical conspiracies. There is a noticeable pattern here with Trump supporters.

https://www.livescience.com/63658-why-people-believe-conspiracy-theories.html

talltexan

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 1988
Re: Brett Kavanaguh: Yay or Nay?
« Reply #1730 on: October 30, 2018, 09:10:40 AM »
Question.

Has Kavanaugh made any decisions yet?

If I had been given a job to do and haven't done any work for three weeks I'd probably be fired by now.

He's been part of all hearings--therefore all decisions--since being seated on Oct. 8. Decisions are typically offered after a delay following the hearing.

hoping2retire35

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 1403
  • Location: UPCOUNTRY CAROLINA
  • just want to see where this appears

I'm a red panda

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 7345
  • Location: United States
Re: Brett Kavanaguh: Yay or Nay?
« Reply #1732 on: October 30, 2018, 10:05:50 AM »
Question.

Has Kavanaugh made any decisions yet?

If I had been given a job to do and haven't done any work for three weeks I'd probably be fired by now.

Supreme Court Justices don't make individual decisions. The court issues opinions as a whole.  A justice may choose to write a separate statement to support or dissent when an opinion is released though.
No opinions of the court have been released in 2018.
They are publicly available and will be found here:
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/slipopinion/18


He has done plenty of work. He has attended all hearings since being seated. He has asked questions and been attentive.


I do not think he should have been confirmed; but there is nothing yet to say the guy has not done his job.  I'll wait until he starts stripping people of their rights to be outraged.

oldtoyota

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 3061
Re: Brett Kavanaguh: Yay or Nay?
« Reply #1733 on: October 30, 2018, 09:35:41 PM »


Nothing, other than illustrating how people who point out Ford's gofundme really don't like to talk about Kavanaugh's.

Because I don't think its relevant, he wasn't seeking attention to this matter obviously.  The opinion of some seems to be that Ford had a lot to gain.  Speculation is that this could net 10+M.  I'm cynical enough to know it's certainly a possibility.

"The opinion of some..." Sounds like something Trump would say.

Troll.

Tom Bri

  • Pencil Stache
  • ****
  • Posts: 618
  • Location: Small Town, Flyover Country
  • More just cheap, than Mustachian

MasterStache

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 1775
« Last Edit: November 02, 2018, 11:47:42 AM by MasterStache »

Tom Bri

  • Pencil Stache
  • ****
  • Posts: 618
  • Location: Small Town, Flyover Country
  • More just cheap, than Mustachian

sol

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 7519
  • Age: 41
  • Location: Pacific Northwest
Re: Brett Kavanaguh: Yay or Nay?
« Reply #1737 on: November 02, 2018, 08:01:07 PM »
https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2018-11-02%20CEG%20to%20DOJ%20FBI%20%28Munro-Leighton%20Referral%29%20with%20redacted%20enclosures.pdf

One of the accusers has recanted.

Just to be clear, that anonymous rape accusation was never brought up publicly, and also was not recanted. 

Instead, this lady sent in someone else's unsubstantiated letter as her own, then admitted to doing so.  If this story had ever been publicized as one of Kavanaugh's four accusers, you'd have a better case to argue "one of his acusers has recanted" because none of those four have done so.  This lady never testified under oath, never met with a lawyer, never anything except send someone else's misappropriated letter to congress.

That is not recanting.  The original author of that letter appears to still be unknown, but has not recanted it.  This lady who stole the letter admitted to sending it as if it were her own, and is being prosecuted for it.  Not the same thing as recanting.

But I suppose you'll call that fake news, right?

JetBlast

  • Bristles
  • ***
  • Posts: 324
Re: Brett Kavanaguh: Yay or Nay?
« Reply #1738 on: November 02, 2018, 11:56:53 PM »
Question.

Has Kavanaugh made any decisions yet?

If I had been given a job to do and haven't done any work for three weeks I'd probably be fired by now.

The justices hold weekly conferences during the term, where they discuss the cases they heard argument for the week before. After the discussion they vote on the outcome. The senior justice in the majority assigns the opinion to one of the members in the majority.

Kavanaugh has certainly voted in conference, and if there were any straightforward unanimous cases he may have been assigned the opinion to get his first one out of the way. He may also be writing a dissenting opinion for any cases where he was not with the majority. IIRC, Gorsuch wrote a descent quite early last term.

Tom Bri

  • Pencil Stache
  • ****
  • Posts: 618
  • Location: Small Town, Flyover Country
  • More just cheap, than Mustachian
Re: Brett Kavanaguh: Yay or Nay?
« Reply #1739 on: November 03, 2018, 02:58:56 PM »
https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2018-11-02%20CEG%20to%20DOJ%20FBI%20%28Munro-Leighton%20Referral%29%20with%20redacted%20enclosures.pdf

One of the accusers has recanted.

Just to be clear, that anonymous rape accusation was never brought up publicly, and also was not recanted. 

Instead, this lady sent in someone else's unsubstantiated letter as her own, then admitted to doing so.  If this story had ever been publicized as one of Kavanaugh's four accusers, you'd have a better case to argue "one of his acusers has recanted" because none of those four have done so.  This lady never testified under oath, never met with a lawyer, never anything except send someone else's misappropriated letter to congress.

That is not recanting.  The original author of that letter appears to still be unknown, but has not recanted it.  This lady who stole the letter admitted to sending it as if it were her own, and is being prosecuted for it.  Not the same thing as recanting.

But I suppose you'll call that fake news, right?

Thanks for the info. Why would I call it fake news if it's true? That isn't what the link I provided says, but you may have information I have not seen. It was brought up in a committee hearing. 

I have tried to be civil, polite, and look at both sides. I've asked for clarification from people who seem to have info I don't. 

Tom Bri

  • Pencil Stache
  • ****
  • Posts: 618
  • Location: Small Town, Flyover Country
  • More just cheap, than Mustachian
Re: Brett Kavanaguh: Yay or Nay?
« Reply #1740 on: November 04, 2018, 02:57:12 PM »
https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2018-11-02%20CEG%20to%20DOJ%20FBI%20%28Munro-Leighton%20Referral%29%20with%20redacted%20enclosures.pdf

One of the accusers has recanted.

Just to be clear, that anonymous rape accusation was never brought up publicly, and also was not recanted. 

Instead, this lady sent in someone else's unsubstantiated letter as her own, then admitted to doing so.  If this story had ever been publicized as one of Kavanaugh's four accusers, you'd have a better case to argue "one of his acusers has recanted" because none of those four have done so.  This lady never testified under oath, never met with a lawyer, never anything except send someone else's misappropriated letter to congress.

That is not recanting.  The original author of that letter appears to still be unknown, but has not recanted it.  This lady who stole the letter admitted to sending it as if it were her own, and is being prosecuted for it.  Not the same thing as recanting.

But I suppose you'll call that fake news, right?

Sorry Sol, went back and looked at it again, and on this one you are wrong. She DID accuse him of rape, and she DID recant. So my original post on this was 100% correct. That she played a weird game with some other person's letter is besides the point. She is just another nutty political activist.

By the way, did you read the letter? Amazing! Like some bodice-ripper. How anyone took that seriously I can't guess.

bacchi

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 3192
Re: Brett Kavanaguh: Yay or Nay?
« Reply #1741 on: November 04, 2018, 03:16:55 PM »
How anyone took that seriously I can't guess.

There were also people who took Jack Burkman and Jacob Wohl's accusations against Mueller seriously.

sol

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 7519
  • Age: 41
  • Location: Pacific Northwest
Re: Brett Kavanaguh: Yay or Nay?
« Reply #1742 on: November 04, 2018, 03:39:42 PM »
How anyone took that seriously I can't guess.

I don't think anybody did take it seriously, which may be why it was never reported in the national news the way the other allegations were.

And lets not forget that the same process that revealed that this lady's story seems fabricated also determined that the other stores seemed genuine.  Republicans still claimed "we'll never know for sure" and then promoted old Brett anyway.

partgypsy

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 2438
Re: Brett Kavanaguh: Yay or Nay?
« Reply #1743 on: November 05, 2018, 01:36:23 PM »
https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2018-11-02%20CEG%20to%20DOJ%20FBI%20%28Munro-Leighton%20Referral%29%20with%20redacted%20enclosures.pdf

One of the accusers has recanted.

Just to be clear, that anonymous rape accusation was never brought up publicly, and also was not recanted. 

Instead, this lady sent in someone else's unsubstantiated letter as her own, then admitted to doing so.  If this story had ever been publicized as one of Kavanaugh's four accusers, you'd have a better case to argue "one of his acusers has recanted" because none of those four have done so.  This lady never testified under oath, never met with a lawyer, never anything except send someone else's misappropriated letter to congress.

That is not recanting.  The original author of that letter appears to still be unknown, but has not recanted it.  This lady who stole the letter admitted to sending it as if it were her own, and is being prosecuted for it.  Not the same thing as recanting.

But I suppose you'll call that fake news, right?

Sorry Sol, went back and looked at it again, and on this one you are wrong. She DID accuse him of rape, and she DID recant. So my original post on this was 100% correct. That she played a weird game with some other person's letter is besides the point. She is just another nutty political activist.

By the way, did you read the letter? Amazing! Like some bodice-ripper. How anyone took that seriously I can't guess.

Hmm. It's almost like you are saying there is a process in place to distinguish between credible, and non-credible accusations. And that it works. Trump admitted that Ford's statement were credible. But then attacked her, a bunch of conspiracy crap thrown at her including fake photoes. After Kavanaugh was confirmed when asked again, Trump stated "it doesn't matter. We won."

That pretty much sums it up.

Dabnasty

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 1238
Re: Brett Kavanaguh: Yay or Nay?
« Reply #1744 on: November 05, 2018, 02:20:06 PM »
https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2018-11-02%20CEG%20to%20DOJ%20FBI%20%28Munro-Leighton%20Referral%29%20with%20redacted%20enclosures.pdf

One of the accusers has recanted.

Just to be clear, that anonymous rape accusation was never brought up publicly, and also was not recanted. 

Instead, this lady sent in someone else's unsubstantiated letter as her own, then admitted to doing so.  If this story had ever been publicized as one of Kavanaugh's four accusers, you'd have a better case to argue "one of his acusers has recanted" because none of those four have done so.  This lady never testified under oath, never met with a lawyer, never anything except send someone else's misappropriated letter to congress.

That is not recanting.  The original author of that letter appears to still be unknown, but has not recanted it.  This lady who stole the letter admitted to sending it as if it were her own, and is being prosecuted for it.  Not the same thing as recanting.

But I suppose you'll call that fake news, right?

Sorry Sol, went back and looked at it again, and on this one you are wrong. She DID accuse him of rape, and she DID recant. So my original post on this was 100% correct. That she played a weird game with some other person's letter is besides the point. She is just another nutty political activist.

By the way, did you read the letter? Amazing! Like some bodice-ripper. How anyone took that seriously I can't guess.

Let's go back to your original statement, "One of the accusers has recanted". Technically speaking this may be a true statement but it is misleading at best and debatably untrue within the context of this thread.

When you say "one of the accusers" this implies one of the 4 accusers who have been discussed in this thread. The woman you are referring to was not one of them. If you had said "One of the accusers" It would have been less misleading, but still largely irrelevant.

Basically the standards for your statement to be true are low enough that any one of us could make an accusation against Kavanaugh today, recant it tomorrow, and the same would be true of us. Do you really think this is relevant to the discussion?

ETA: Just found Trump's tweet regarding this other accuser

"A vicious accuser of Justice Kavanaugh has just admitted that she was lying, her story was totally made up, or FAKE! Can you imagine if he didn’t become a Justice of the Supreme Court because of her disgusting False Statements. What about the others? Where are the Dems on this?"
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 3, 2018

Even Trump didn't go as far as to refer to her as "One of the accusers". His statement is however misleading for other reasons.
« Last Edit: November 05, 2018, 02:33:35 PM by Dabnasty »

dustinst22

  • Pencil Stache
  • ****
  • Posts: 577
  • Age: 40
  • Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Re: Brett Kavanaguh: Yay or Nay?
« Reply #1745 on: November 05, 2018, 02:32:38 PM »
So let me get this straight.  One accuser has recanted, and one of the "original 4" mentioned above has a history of making false accusations (Julie Swetnick).  She lied to her former employer that she had a degree from John Hopkins University when she didn't.  She made accusations against her employer of making "unwanted sexual innuendo" at her workplace, and later sued the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority on the grounds that a fall she had on a train cost her a lucrative modeling gig.  She's also been involved in over 6 cases in the past 20 yrs.  This was a lame attempt to get into the media glare.  I hope any false accusers get punished by the maximum amount allowable.

« Last Edit: November 05, 2018, 02:46:53 PM by dustinst22 »

GuitarStv

  • Senior Mustachian
  • ********
  • Posts: 12294
  • Age: 37
  • Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Re: Brett Kavanaguh: Yay or Nay?
« Reply #1746 on: November 05, 2018, 06:14:28 PM »
I hope any false accusers get punished by the maximum amount allowable.

Agreed.  It's one of the reasons that I wanted a full investigation done.  Guilty parties should be held responsible for their actions.  By blocking a proper investigation, the Republicans prevented this from happening.

MasterStache

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 1775
Re: Brett Kavanaguh: Yay or Nay?
« Reply #1747 on: November 06, 2018, 06:03:08 AM »
I hope any false accusers get punished by the maximum amount allowable.

Agreed.  It's one of the reasons that I wanted a full investigation done.  Guilty parties should be held responsible for their actions.  By blocking a proper investigation, the Republicans prevented this from happening.

+1

The double standard is so blatantly obvious.

Kris

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 3402
Re: Brett Kavanaguh: Yay or Nay?
« Reply #1748 on: November 09, 2018, 05:23:57 PM »
So yeah. It’s obvious that Christine Blasey Ford accused Kavanaugh because of everything she had to gain /s

https://www.scarymommy.com/christine-blasey-ford-death-threats-2/?utm_source=FB

Just Joe

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 2213
Re: Brett Kavanaguh: Yay or Nay?
« Reply #1749 on: November 27, 2018, 07:44:38 AM »
Pat Robertson also said that  Trump’s best course of action after the indictments against his former campaign staffers is to issue a “blanket pardon” to anyone indicted in connection with the investigations into Russia and shut down Robert Mueller’s “tainted” special counsel investigation.  He is also a past president of the Council for National Policy.  I used to make fun of conspiracy theorists, still do, but these people all have weird interconnections that freak me out.

There is a podcast on Stitcher called "The Dream" about MLMs. A good listen. Episode 10 - they connect many of the big names. Wow...