Consent can be withdrawn at anytime and someone unconcious or extraoridnarily drunk is not able to do that.
Yes, I agree that consent can be withdrawn at any time. That does not mean that it will be withdrawn, or must be withdrawn, just because a person is drunk. It is possible to get blackout drunk and still want to have sex. Go ahead, ask me how I know.
If the girl in this story, who apparently had sex with multiple dudes while drinking, claims she was raped or claims that she wasn't, she's probably right. It hinges on how she feels about the experience. Sadly, the dudes in this group sex story stupidly exposed themselves to huge liability by not individually getting affirmative consent, but that does not necessarily mean they did anything legally wrong, if the girl is okay with it.
I'm just saying that a girl who wants to have sex with a bunch of dudes is allowed to do that. No one gets to call her a rape victim just because she was drinking. You may feel she was violated if you disagree with her choices, but they are still her choices to make.
Should any of those dudes be supreme court justices? That seems like a laughably obvious no to me, because the only dudes that I know that have had group sex with passed out chicks, consensual or otherwise, are all admitted criminals for multiple reasons. Even the ones who eventually turned their lives around know they can never submit to a background check.
At this point, this is roughly the situation I expect to unfold. The FBI will determine that Brett here spent some quiet time with a passed out chick at a party, touched her body in sexually inappropriate ways, but didn't put his penis inside of her. He will claim that he thought this was consensual, just like Mark Judge has, and he can still honestly say he was a virgin, and did not gang rape anyone. She may or may not claim that it was consensual, but it won't matter because the Senate will decide he didn't quite lie under oath (no one asked him if he ever touched an unconscious woman at a party). Mark Judge's memory of the Ford assault will be as reliable as everything else about Mark Judge, aka "not at all" because that dude is a walking addiction recovery commercial, and so there will be no possible corroboration or exoneration on the Ford assault, only corroboration of similar but technically noncriminal behavior. Kavanaugh will have to admit to all kinds of embarrassing things (underage drinking, indecent exposure, etc) but they'll confirm him anyway. Here's hoping I'm wrong.