TIPS should all come with a massive "caveat emptor" as 99% of people who own them don't own what they think they own (an inflation hedge).
@vand, why aren't TIPS an inflation hedge?
Or are you saying they're an inflation hedge, but 99% of buyers fail to receive the hedge because of some mistake?
Yes, 2 points:
First, they are still primarily bonds at the end of the day. They can't protect you from *unexpected* inflation, or if real yields rise.
And, if you buy them when inflation expectations are high, and actual inflation comes in lower, you can lose out that way.
S&P U.S. TIPS 1-3 Year Index went down in 2022
https://www.spglobal.com/spdji/en/indices/fixed-income/sp-us-tips-1-3-year-index/#overview
Likewise, Vanguard's VTIP fund with an average duration of 2.5 years did not keep up with inflation during 2022-23 - due to the higher real yields.
Second, same with any long dated bond fund, they can be very volatile in the short term and many people will buy a long duration fund just thinking they protect you against inflation in any environment without having an appreciation for the interest rate risk they are taking on.
I didn’t read the link because the permissions require social media sharing. But I have always read the IPS in TIPS stands for Inflation Protected Securities. Why doesn’t the inflation protection work?
“They’re bonds” doesn’t seem like a clear answer. I understand that a fixed rate bond’s value will change when the interest rate environment changes. But the point of TIPS is that they’re not “fixed”, isn’t it?
I read elsewhere (sample link below) that every six months, the US Treasury adjusts the face value of the bond in accordance with the inflation rate, and that the interest on TIPS is proportional to the face value. Shouldn’t they behave differently from fixed rate bonds?
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/t/tips.aspI held VTIP briefly in early 2022 and did observe its value falling when interest rates went up. Maybe the value changed because of the 6 months before adjustment rates, or because of fund details like redemptions?
It seems like the individual bonds should adjust as specified, with the result being to in fact largely be protected against inflation. If “real yields rise” in the overall market, I’d expect that holding to maturity would work as specified in the bond’s terms. In the event of selling, I see your point that yields of other bonds could rise more than inflation, reducing the sale price relative to the unadjusted component of the bond, but if inflation were rising at the time, there should be an advantage due to the inflation adjustment.
I guess it’s hard to calculate the result without projecting both factors?