Author Topic: OFFICIAL: Blockchain / Crypto-Currency Portfolios and Discussion  (Read 139729 times)

privatefarmer

  • 5 O'Clock Shadow
  • *
  • Posts: 49
Re: OFFICIAL: Blockchain / Crypto-Currency Portfolios and Discussion
« Reply #1050 on: March 01, 2018, 12:12:18 AM »


FWIW in order to liquidate our stock positions, a "bigger fool" must be present to buy them.  I understand what you are saying about investing, this is an unconventional asset class. Purchasing btc is a bet that the future userbase will be larger than it is today, or as a hedge that potential future timelines where the userbase is larger are also timelines where traditional assets are struggling.

I have seen variations of this falsehood being repeated over and over by the pro-crypto bunch.  People who invest in the stock market do not require greater fools for their investment to be successful.  A share of stock entitles the owner to a share of future earnings of a company, or in the case of an index fund, all of the companies represented on the index.  The share of future earnings is realized by the payment of dividends and as an accumulation of retained earnings which will accrue to book value and as investments in future profitability of the company.  The stock price is a market-based discounting mechanism of the net-present value of those two things, nothing more.  Usually the price is an accurate representation of the NPV, but it can swing in one direction or another from time to time.  In the same way that a person who buys a whole company can be a perfectly successful investor without ever selling it -- because all of the profits are his own and he can sell an asset of the company, e.g. a forklift, and pay himself the proceeds -- a person who buys a share of a publicly traded company on the stock market can also be a perfectly successful investor without ever needing to sell.

The continued argument from the pro-crypto bunch that in order for an investment in the stock to be successful an ever expanding pool of "greater fools" to come in and buy at a higher price is needed is a naive and unsophisticated understanding of stocks and a stock market and it exhibits a fundamental lack of understanding of the nature of investment.

This.

The lack of understanding of how the stock market works is astounding. Investing in companies, sharing in their profits, is INVESTING. Buying something that just sits there and doesn't pay you anything, whether it be a rock, a piece of gold, or a bitcoin, is SPECULATING. You are SPECULATING that a bigger fool will pay more than what you paid for it. If you own a share of a company you are BEING PAID via dividends/buybacks. When Apple sells an iphone, a percentage of that sale goes to YOU the shareholder. Stocks and bitcoin are apples and oranges. One is investing, sharing the profits, increasing your wealth over time, the other is gambling.

privatefarmer

  • 5 O'Clock Shadow
  • *
  • Posts: 49
Re: OFFICIAL: Blockchain / Crypto-Currency Portfolios and Discussion
« Reply #1051 on: March 01, 2018, 12:13:05 AM »
If there were a company who "mined" bitcoin, sold that bitcoin and made a profit doing so, I would consider buying shares of that company. THAT would be investing.

Mr Mark

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 1127
  • Location: Planet Earth
  • Achieved Financial Independence summer 2014. RE'18
Re: OFFICIAL: Blockchain / Crypto-Currency Portfolios and Discussion
« Reply #1052 on: March 01, 2018, 12:55:36 AM »


FWIW in order to liquidate our stock positions, a "bigger fool" must be present to buy them.  I understand what you are saying about investing, this is an unconventional asset class. Purchasing btc is a bet that the future userbase will be larger than it is today, or as a hedge that potential future timelines where the userbase is larger are also timelines where traditional assets are struggling.

I have seen variations of this falsehood being repeated over and over by the pro-crypto bunch.  People who invest in the stock market do not require greater fools for their investment to be successful.  A share of stock entitles the owner to a share of future earnings of a company, or in the case of an index fund, all of the companies represented on the index.  The share of future earnings is realized by the payment of dividends and as an accumulation of retained earnings which will accrue to book value and as investments in future profitability of the company.  The stock price is a market-based discounting mechanism of the net-present value of those two things, nothing more.  Usually the price is an accurate representation of the NPV, but it can swing in one direction or another from time to time.  In the same way that a person who buys a whole company can be a perfectly successful investor without ever selling it -- because all of the profits are his own and he can sell an asset of the company, e.g. a forklift, and pay himself the proceeds -- a person who buys a share of a publicly traded company on the stock market can also be a perfectly successful investor without ever needing to sell.

The continued argument from the pro-crypto bunch that in order for an investment in the stock to be successful an ever expanding pool of "greater fools" to come in and buy at a higher price is needed is a naive and unsophisticated understanding of stocks and a stock market and it exhibits a fundamental lack of understanding of the nature of investment.

This.

The lack of understanding of how the stock market works is astounding. Investing in companies, sharing in their profits, is INVESTING. Buying something that just sits there and doesn't pay you anything, whether it be a rock, a piece of gold, or a bitcoin, is SPECULATING. You are SPECULATING that a bigger fool will pay more than what you paid for it. If you own a share of a company you are BEING PAID via dividends/buybacks. When Apple sells an iphone, a percentage of that sale goes to YOU the shareholder. Stocks and bitcoin are apples and oranges. One is investing, sharing the profits, increasing your wealth over time, the other is gambling.

+1 more

Another alternative is active investing - in an area where you have 'inside' knowledge that enables you to beat the market. Legally this can be done in your local real estate market. It takes work but local knowledge can give you an edge that some REIT manager in NY simply doesn't have.
Mr. Mark

$25 free for your hotel stays by using this link to join  Booking.com https://www.booking.com/s/27_8/ef1fdaad

misterhorsey

  • Bristles
  • ***
  • Posts: 347
Re: OFFICIAL: Blockchain / Crypto-Currency Portfolios and Discussion
« Reply #1053 on: March 01, 2018, 12:59:51 AM »
I won't quote all the text but I'm replying to privatefarmer's post immediately above...

Is a potential source of confusion the fact that while one can invest by buying stocks (that earn an income, and holding them long turn), you can also in some cases also buy stocks for purely speculative reasons?

It's actually not quite so black and white, i.e. stocks = good, crypto = bad.  In an effort to dispel some of the myths of the Stockmarket propounded by crypto fans, I feel sometimes the shortcomings of the Stockmarket are ignored. Short term speculative trading in stocks can be equally bad news.

So while not recommended, the greater fool approach to buying and selling stocks can apply. The market can be gamed.  Whether via taking a punt on the latest biotech without earnings, or engaging in illegal 'pump and dumps'.  Then you can leverage up and add in options to increase the pain.

Most people new to the Stockmarket seem to initially educate themselves via mainstream business news - which ignores the boredom of ongoing compounding returns in favour of booms, busts, day traders and line charts that inevitably crash. So they inevitably equate stock trading with gambling, unless they choose to educate themselves further.

Bitcoin hype in the mainstream media seems to attract some people to thinking about investments, but sends them down the path of speculation.

shadow

  • Stubble
  • **
  • Posts: 116
Re: OFFICIAL: Blockchain / Crypto-Currency Portfolios and Discussion
« Reply #1054 on: March 01, 2018, 11:31:37 AM »
However, my curiosity about Crypto currency is probably about the the way that it has been the starting point for a speculative craze, at the moment, and the psychology of investing.  I'm primarily interested in the way people make investment decisions based on whatever imperfect information that they may have at hand at any given time. I'm interested in how people become anchored in certain investment decisions, the way confirmation bias kicks in, the way people have an aversion to certain types of risk but also, due to what I think is access to poor quality information or subscribing to a simplified model of the world that makes sense in their own minds, embrace a level of risk they might otherwise be unwilling to take in other circumstances.

It's not just crypto of course where people behave 'irrationally'.  Plenty of people keep their savings in cash, because it's 'safe' not realising that the stead erosion caused by inflation makes it, in the long term, an undesirable store of value.

I'm personally skeptical about crypto speculation because it's a fascinating real time version of all the bubbles you read about (Mississipi company, South Sea bubble, Tuplips, Dot.Com etc).

I'm personally dubious about the utility of crypto on a economic / societal level as the current system, with all it's imperfections and distortions, seems to work okay with a low barrier to entry, good confidence, and minimal transactional friction to users on an individual level. 

I dare say a lot of the interest in the utility of crypto is used to justify the spectacular price appreciation of the former. I think, as I think Surf has set out, that the two are quite distinct considerations. However, how much interest in the former would there be without the price appreciation?

The spotlight is on crypto and it draws from a spectrum of people. Those who like to gamble; those who are trying to greater fool others; those who are very gullible; those who overestimate their competencies; those who fool themselves and are delusional; those whose judgement and rationality are impaired by greed; those who have skewed understanding of liquidity, market capitalizations, p/e ratios, trading, etc. Most people will be devoured by the malicious and their own greed used to exploit them. At least 25% of the top twenty coins and at least 70% overall, I believe are scams, even though they have teams of professionals and associations with big name companies. The reasons I believe this are due to my understanding of the tech and very egregarious behavior by teams when their coins come under scrutiny; for example, one of the coins had a vulnerability exposed in an open source code and they defended it as an intentional backdoor. 

There is alot of lawlessness in the space right now, and I believe many people will lose money to sophisticated scammers with personas of reputable white-collar experts. There will also be more hacks and stolen funds. You can warn people to stay out of crypto and hope they listen. Or hope they limit their exposure to a small percentage for speculating. But most likely many will end up falling for seductive words of professional marketers and shills. Some people in the space believe in crypto, and these people all believe they have the highest probability of picking the winners. It's like a business statistic, where most first-time businesses fail; however people won't know they've failed until they do so. Unlike businesses though, the people that are going to speculate in crypto, no matter what, have more flexibility to specify and need to limit their exposure to a small amount. This way if they lose, they lose small, but if they win, they win a mini-lottery. If they have index fund and rental properties, etc, they shouldn't take from this and put into crypto. You hope they listen.

I foresee most current crypto will fail, at least 80-90%. It will happened at staggered intervals, and probably occasionally large clusters of failure coinciding. As to whether a 'currency' will emerge from among these current cryptocurrencies, the odds of that happening are very, very low. The few cryptocurrencies that will survive the duration will most likely be a utility token in some form, that will act as infrastructure and protocol blockchains, able to immensely scale while preserving decentralization and security.

There are areas of crypto I'm also skeptical about. Crypto itself, however, my conclusion is still that it will become integral to the way units of accounting are transacted over the internet. It advances asymmetric cryptography and allows for a new form of digital communication. I don't have the full awareness and scope of what the effects will be and how it will evolve; however, I'm confident that it will be used and mass adopted and it will provide value.



Travis

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 2182
  • Location: Tempe, AZ
Re: OFFICIAL: Blockchain / Crypto-Currency Portfolios and Discussion
« Reply #1055 on: March 01, 2018, 12:09:39 PM »
I won't quote all the text but I'm replying to privatefarmer's post immediately above...

Is a potential source of confusion the fact that while one can invest by buying stocks (that earn an income, and holding them long turn), you can also in some cases also buy stocks for purely speculative reasons?

It's actually not quite so black and white, i.e. stocks = good, crypto = bad.  In an effort to dispel some of the myths of the Stockmarket propounded by crypto fans, I feel sometimes the shortcomings of the Stockmarket are ignored. Short term speculative trading in stocks can be equally bad news.

So while not recommended, the greater fool approach to buying and selling stocks can apply. The market can be gamed.  Whether via taking a punt on the latest biotech without earnings, or engaging in illegal 'pump and dumps'.  Then you can leverage up and add in options to increase the pain.

Most people new to the Stockmarket seem to initially educate themselves via mainstream business news - which ignores the boredom of ongoing compounding returns in favour of booms, busts, day traders and line charts that inevitably crash. So they inevitably equate stock trading with gambling, unless they choose to educate themselves further.

Bitcoin hype in the mainstream media seems to attract some people to thinking about investments, but sends them down the path of speculation.

Absolutely stocks can be speculated; however, there are mechanisms in place that spell out to you if your purchase is going anywhere.  In the late 1990s, anything with "net" in the name got an IPO and people throwing money at it.  They bought the hype and there was a run up on many of these companies that turned out to be worthless.  The controls were already in place to alert them to this situation, but people ignored them.  Before you buy a stock, you can conduct research of that company and find out beforehand if the company actually produces something and either is or might make a profit in the future.  We talk about P/E here all the time and whether a stock price accurately reflects its real value.
My Journal: http://forum.mrmoneymustache.com/journals/will-i-or-won't-i-a-home-run-or-a-base-hit/

Unlike some other tech companies or skilled-labor industries, we're always hiring.

www.goarmy.com

sol

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 6562
  • Age: 41
  • Location: Pacific Northwest
Re: OFFICIAL: Blockchain / Crypto-Currency Portfolios and Discussion
« Reply #1056 on: March 01, 2018, 12:26:51 PM »
It advances asymmetric cryptography and allows for a new form of digital communication.

I'm not so sure.  I think PGP was a much bigger step forward in terms of making cryptography useful for digital communications, but almost nobody uses it anymore.  We've all just decided that weak privacy through ad-supported corporate services is more convenient. 

We have the illusion of enhanced privacy with "incognito mode" that doesn't actually encrypt anything.  We like having password recovery options, because we want to put trust in real people instead of secret codes to protect us.  And if you want to be more anonymous you can always play with tor, but just like bitcoin it's mostly criminal and illegal activities that benefit there.

Civilization thrives with trust.  Instead of giving everyone the best deadbolt for their front door, we pay police to deter burglary and hunt down criminals, including busting down their front doors.  Instead of irreversible anonymous financial transactions, we pay banks to track terrorism and drug money and freeze the assets of rogue actors.  In all aspects of society from schools to traffic to real estate, trust makes the system work and individual cryptography just incentives crime. 

I understand the argument about crypto protecting people from overzealous government intrusion, but we need and want our government to stabilize society as long as it is democratically elected and corruption free.  America protects your freedoms by NOT giving you perfect privacy.  You are not allowed to keep a child sex slave in your basement, and we want government to be able to forcibly intervene in that situation.  Perfect encryption, like an impenetrable door lock, gives you the power (and the "freedom") to break the law at will.  That infringes upon the freedoms of everyone else.

If you want to live in modern society, you have to forfeit some of your freedoms.  You cannot murder without consequences, so you forfeit your freedom to murder in exchange for protection from being murdered.  Crypto is the opposite deal; you get to do anything at all, but the price is that you have no protections.  You can't stop child porn of your kids from being distributed with crypto.  Your cryptocoins are not insured or otherwise retrievable when the exchange gets hacked.  The terrorist plot goes undetected until the buildings start to fall.

Perfect cryptography literally undermines the very idea of civilization.  It is power without responsibility, freedom without protection, personal gain at the expense of society as a whole.  It is arguably an evil idea, even when well intentioned.

shadow

  • Stubble
  • **
  • Posts: 116
Re: OFFICIAL: Blockchain / Crypto-Currency Portfolios and Discussion
« Reply #1057 on: March 01, 2018, 01:27:45 PM »
Perfect cryptography literally undermines the very idea of civilization.  It is power without responsibility, freedom without protection, personal gain at the expense of society as a whole. It is arguably an evil idea, even when well intentioned. 

We already had this discussion. Crypto is double-edge, just like the internet, science, weapons, medicine, any other technology. Society is going to have to decide collectively how to handle it going forward.
   

   

sol

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 6562
  • Age: 41
  • Location: Pacific Northwest
Re: OFFICIAL: Blockchain / Crypto-Currency Portfolios and Discussion
« Reply #1058 on: March 01, 2018, 01:59:46 PM »
We already had this discussion. Crypto is double-edge, just like the internet, science, weapons, medicine, any other technology.

I don't think it's at all analogous.  Science and the internet and medicine are all pro-social ideas.  They can help societies thrive by making life better.

Cryptography doesn't advance the interests of civilized society.  It can't be used to build trust and cooperation, to facilitate progress, or to help people live better lives. It can only be used to do the opposite.

Maybe weapons are a better analogy?  Weapons are designed to kill people, and we sometimes use them to kill people in order to protect the rights of other people, but I feel like that role should be reserved to the state.  I don't want every citizen to have RPGs locked and loaded by the front door, or claymores around the perimeter of their lawn, or sarin gas in their refrigerator.  These things are destructive tools that should not be widespread among the public, but reserved for use in exceptional cases by a democratically elected representative government.  And basically prohibited to everyone else, because they are powerfully evil.  They do not serve society by becoming widely distributed.  You don't make society better by giving out sarin nerve gas.

I can see a legitimate governmental use for perfect unhackable cryptography.  I don't see many legitimate private uses yet, but I sure do see a whole bunch of illegitimate and dangerous and illegal ones.

If cryptography fundamentally undermines the basic social contract on which civilization is built, do we really want everyone to have unlimited access to it? Do we really have a choice anymore?

shadow

  • Stubble
  • **
  • Posts: 116
Re: OFFICIAL: Blockchain / Crypto-Currency Portfolios and Discussion
« Reply #1059 on: March 01, 2018, 02:13:06 PM »
Cryptography doesn't advance the interests of civilized society.  It can't be used to build trust and cooperation, to facilitate progress, or to help people live better lives. It can only be used to do the opposite.

Cryptography underpins digital infrastrastructure. The modern internet would not function without cryptography. Cryptography has enormously advanced the interests of civilized society and has added trust in areas where there wouldn't be any.

Regarding the blockchain, it is not protected from any method a government agency currently has to decrypt or bruteforce encryption. Blockchain makes use of cryptography for non-intermediary transactions.

 

Telecaster

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 1129
  • Location: Seattle, WA
Re: OFFICIAL: Blockchain / Crypto-Currency Portfolios and Discussion
« Reply #1060 on: March 01, 2018, 03:18:00 PM »
I can see a legitimate governmental use for perfect unhackable cryptography.  I don't see many legitimate private uses yet, but I sure do see a whole bunch of illegitimate and dangerous and illegal ones.

If cryptography fundamentally undermines the basic social contract on which civilization is built, do we really want everyone to have unlimited access to it? Do we really have a choice anymore?

I wouldn't go that far.  Your web browser uses security hash algorithms to make secure connections.   Most likely the same one that Bitcoin relies on.  I agree with your point about trust and the social contract, but security is important too.  That's why we have locks on our doors, and our online banking is protected by passwords.  We constantly hear stories how Target (or whoever) was hacked and the thieves stole 20,000,000 credit card numbers.  How come those numbers weren't encrypted?   If they had been encrypted they couldn't have been stolen.  Security helps keep out the bad actors, and that allows us to trust things like credit card transactions. 

But back to your point on trust.  All money is a figment of our imagination.  We just all believe it to exist...and there it is.  But people don't really believe in Bitcoin.  How do we know?  Because the price compared to something we do believe in, the USD, changes radically over time.   And that's the fundamental problem.  People don't really believe in it. 


Surf

  • 5 O'Clock Shadow
  • *
  • Posts: 63
Re: OFFICIAL: Blockchain / Crypto-Currency Portfolios and Discussion
« Reply #1061 on: March 01, 2018, 11:46:53 PM »


FWIW in order to liquidate our stock positions, a "bigger fool" must be present to buy them.  I understand what you are saying about investing, this is an unconventional asset class. Purchasing btc is a bet that the future userbase will be larger than it is today, or as a hedge that potential future timelines where the userbase is larger are also timelines where traditional assets are struggling.

I have seen variations of this falsehood being repeated over and over by the pro-crypto bunch.  People who invest in the stock market do not require greater fools for their investment to be successful.  A share of stock entitles the owner to a share of future earnings of a company, or in the case of an index fund, all of the companies represented on the index.  The share of future earnings is realized by the payment of dividends and as an accumulation of retained earnings which will accrue to book value and as investments in future profitability of the company.  The stock price is a market-based discounting mechanism of the net-present value of those two things, nothing more.  Usually the price is an accurate representation of the NPV, but it can swing in one direction or another from time to time.  In the same way that a person who buys a whole company can be a perfectly successful investor without ever selling it -- because all of the profits are his own and he can sell an asset of the company, e.g. a forklift, and pay himself the proceeds -- a person who buys a share of a publicly traded company on the stock market can also be a perfectly successful investor without ever needing to sell.

The continued argument from the pro-crypto bunch that in order for an investment in the stock to be successful an ever expanding pool of "greater fools" to come in and buy at a higher price is needed is a naive and unsophisticated understanding of stocks and a stock market and it exhibits a fundamental lack of understanding of the nature of investment.

I am aware of the functioning of stocks, and I own plenty.  You disagreed with something I didn't say.

http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/equity-investment.html
Quote
Money that is invested in a firm by its owner(s) or holder(s) of common stock (ordinary shares) but which is not returned in the normal course of the business. Investors recover it only when they sell their shareholdings to other investors, or when the assets of the firm are liquidated and proceeds distributed among them after satisfying the firm's obligations. Also called equity contribution.

I said in order to liquidate your investment you must have someone to sell the shares(or have the firm liquidate all its assets, whatever's left after satisfying their debts).  I didn't say you had to liquidate them in order to be profitable.

The illustrative point is that if all the future stock investors disappeared those who were left holding shares would have no way out(without the company liquidating.)

Surf

  • 5 O'Clock Shadow
  • *
  • Posts: 63
Re: OFFICIAL: Blockchain / Crypto-Currency Portfolios and Discussion
« Reply #1062 on: March 02, 2018, 12:06:05 AM »
I hate to burst your "scientific" bubble here, but the stock market (and the larger economy that it is a rough proxy for) is not at all a zero sum game. Why on earth would you think that?

-W

Whew I put up a LOT of information there and the two direct replies were either a complete misreading (first one) or harping on an ancillary point that again actually misreads what I wrote.

I should have included "trading" or "competing" for clarification.  My sentence about zero-sum stands, though.  Individual trades in the market are zero sum, one person buys, the other sells, no new money is created.  Technically slightly negative sum as a fee is extracted.  If you are trading all day you are participating in a zero sum environment vs other entities and you best make sure you are in the top half.

The second half of my statement "which grows over time" indicates that the buy-and-hold aspect of the stock market is NOT zero sum.  Companies gain value and that value is transferred to the stock owners.  That's why we all own stock funds.

@waltworks  Any thoughts on the (hopefully thought provoking) ideas I offered?

Surf

  • 5 O'Clock Shadow
  • *
  • Posts: 63
Re: OFFICIAL: Blockchain / Crypto-Currency Portfolios and Discussion
« Reply #1063 on: March 02, 2018, 12:16:16 AM »

But back to your point on trust.  All money is a figment of our imagination.  We just all believe it to exist...and there it is.  But people don't really believe in Bitcoin.  How do we know?  Because the price compared to something we do believe in, the USD, changes radically over time.   And that's the fundamental problem.  People don't really believe in it.

This is an excellent point, one I discussed recently after reading "Sapiens," which I recommend.

One could take an alternative perspective:  Despite the volatility, humanity has continued to believe Bitcoin is worth something.  To the best of my very limited knowledge no modern instrument has survived multiple speculative bubble pops and stabilized after each one.

It is a fascinating little experiment.  Value tied to adoption rate, adoption rate tied to utility provided.  Eventual utility level unknown as it is still in active development. 

Speculation mimics actual adoption and so sees surge in price, but provides no sustained utility to the network and eventually get-rich-quick-ers abandon ship.  This erodes confidence in btc as volatility increases and corrections/crashes ensue, but those who derive value from the network stick around and it eventually flattens out.

waltworks

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 2665
Re: OFFICIAL: Blockchain / Crypto-Currency Portfolios and Discussion
« Reply #1064 on: March 02, 2018, 07:45:45 AM »
Whew I put up a LOT of information there and the two direct replies were either a complete misreading (first one) or harping on an ancillary point that again actually misreads what I wrote.

You did say that "the market always goes up" is "unscientific". Without getting into a philosophy of science debate, you are saying that you question whether the economy of the world/US will continue to grow (as, in the case of the world, it has since prehistory, albeit with some fits and starts), essentially. If you actually believe that, then yes, you will need either a metric ton of money, or some alternative investment/consistent winning in the now-zero-sum game in order to be FI.

Might just as well invest in fertile land and ammunition at that point, not "currency" that requires a ton of energy and computers/internet access just to use/spend, but everyone's different. 

-W

trollwithamustache

  • Bristles
  • ***
  • Posts: 487
Re: OFFICIAL: Blockchain / Crypto-Currency Portfolios and Discussion
« Reply #1065 on: March 02, 2018, 08:08:17 AM »
I can see a legitimate governmental use for perfect unhackable cryptography.  I don't see many legitimate private uses yet, but I sure do see a whole bunch of illegitimate and dangerous and illegal ones.

If cryptography fundamentally undermines the basic social contract on which civilization is built, do we really want everyone to have unlimited access to it? Do we really have a choice anymore?

This seems a bit melodramatic.  why can't your thoughts be private?

With the internet providing a stored record of everything, my kids thoughts aren't private anymore. All the stupid shit I thought and said growing up, as a teenage, in college is behind me and there isn't any Facebook timeline of.  Now, if I am interested in an obscure topic and research it a bit, all of my banner adds change to match .    if cryptography gives the privacy to explore an idea before you decide if you like it or not that's something I support.

L.A.S.

  • Pencil Stache
  • ****
  • Posts: 623
Re: OFFICIAL: Blockchain / Crypto-Currency Portfolios and Discussion
« Reply #1066 on: March 02, 2018, 08:29:24 AM »

I said in order to liquidate your investment you must have someone to sell the shares(or have the firm liquidate all its assets, whatever's left after satisfying their debts). 



No. This is not what you said.  You said that a "bigger fool" must be present.  This is simply wrong in the context of stocks.  Bigger fools are not required.


Surf

  • 5 O'Clock Shadow
  • *
  • Posts: 63
Re: OFFICIAL: Blockchain / Crypto-Currency Portfolios and Discussion
« Reply #1067 on: March 02, 2018, 09:14:34 AM »
Whew I put up a LOT of information there and the two direct replies were either a complete misreading (first one) or harping on an ancillary point that again actually misreads what I wrote.

You did say that "the market always goes up" is "unscientific". Without getting into a philosophy of science debate, you are saying that you question whether the economy of the world/US will continue to grow (as, in the case of the world, it has since prehistory, albeit with some fits and starts), essentially. If you actually believe that, then yes, you will need either a metric ton of money, or some alternative investment/consistent winning in the now-zero-sum game in order to be FI.

Might just as well invest in fertile land and ammunition at that point, not "currency" that requires a ton of energy and computers/internet access just to use/spend, but everyone's different. 

-W

The basic approach of the scientific method is to posit a hypothesis and attempt to disprove it.  There is no structural mechanism for proving something conclusively true.  This isn't philosophy, it's the bedrock of scientific reason that brought us out of medieval thinking.

What we can do is make statistical estimates about growth rates and volatility, and use confidence intervals to model a likely range of outcomes. 

What is true is that as growth rates shrink, and/or volatility increases, the wider a range of likely (95%) outcomes that include prolonged downturns or sideways stretches. 

Conflating the advancement of human civilization with the continued returns of the equities market is philosophical optimism, not scientific analysis.

As mustachians we have a core belief in restraint and conservation.  The world would be a vastly better place if there were a paradigm shift away from corporate profits and towards long term sustainability.  In some small way we are betting against our fundamental beliefs when we ride the backs of the corporations, many of whom do much to harm our species long term viability for short term gains.

We are financially incentivized to participate between tax advantages, corporate matching, and the simple fact that owning stocks is the best way to obtain a small slice of these short term gains. 

Ignoring the statistical risks, or investing from an illusory moral high ground, is not scientific.  We do it because it is likely to work, and having more money enables us to lead lives of value.

Surf

  • 5 O'Clock Shadow
  • *
  • Posts: 63
Re: OFFICIAL: Blockchain / Crypto-Currency Portfolios and Discussion
« Reply #1068 on: March 02, 2018, 09:20:22 AM »

I said in order to liquidate your investment you must have someone to sell the shares(or have the firm liquidate all its assets, whatever's left after satisfying their debts). 



No. This is not what you said.  You said that a "bigger fool" must be present.  This is simply wrong in the context of stocks.  Bigger fools are not required.

Maybe we have a misunderstanding here.  My exact sentence was that in order to liquidate your shares there must be someone to sell them to.  The concept of "bigger fool" is an emotional label that you used, and i re-used for illustrative purposes.  Are you saying that the people buying shares are not fools?  Because that's an issue of labeling. 

If you are saying they are not necessary, then how are you going to liquidate your assets without them?  I understand dividends and other mechanisms, but if you have 1M in an index fund and the market stops growing, and there is no one to buy your shares, where does that leave you? 

Just food for thought that you may not think you need "fools" but every time a 20something shows up and says "wow does this really work" her adoption of our collective investment strategy directly benefits us all.

waltworks

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 2665
Re: OFFICIAL: Blockchain / Crypto-Currency Portfolios and Discussion
« Reply #1069 on: March 02, 2018, 10:23:02 AM »
The basic approach of the scientific method is to posit a hypothesis and attempt to disprove it.  There is no structural mechanism for proving something conclusively true.  This isn't philosophy, it's the bedrock of scientific reason that brought us out of medieval thinking.

Ok, so we're getting very metaphysical here, and maybe we'll have to agree to disagree - but there is no "science" in the sense you are talking about involved here. We are not doing experiments under controlled conditions or testing hypotheses. Rather, we are making educated statistical guesses about what will happen in the future based on what has happened in the past.

Even if you can start doing futuristic Asimov style psychohistorical science, what on earth makes you think cryptocurrencies are a good alternative to the stock market? You can certainly believe that stocks are going to all be worthless/return nothing going forward, but that really has nothing to do with crypto being a good alternative investment, does it? If you don't like stocks, there are bonds, real estate of both the arms-length and DIY varieties, direct lending of all sorts of levels of risk, business franchises, etc.

-W

Travis

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 2182
  • Location: Tempe, AZ
My Journal: http://forum.mrmoneymustache.com/journals/will-i-or-won't-i-a-home-run-or-a-base-hit/

Unlike some other tech companies or skilled-labor industries, we're always hiring.

www.goarmy.com

the_gastropod

  • Stubble
  • **
  • Posts: 123
  • Age: 31
  • Location: Brooklyn, NY
Re: OFFICIAL: Blockchain / Crypto-Currency Portfolios and Discussion
« Reply #1071 on: March 02, 2018, 09:12:22 PM »

I said in order to liquidate your investment you must have someone to sell the shares(or have the firm liquidate all its assets, whatever's left after satisfying their debts). 



No. This is not what you said.  You said that a "bigger fool" must be present.  This is simply wrong in the context of stocks.  Bigger fools are not required.

Maybe we have a misunderstanding here.  My exact sentence was that in order to liquidate your shares there must be someone to sell them to.  The concept of "bigger fool" is an emotional label that you used, and i re-used for illustrative purposes.  Are you saying that the people buying shares are not fools?  Because that's an issue of labeling. 

If you are saying they are not necessary, then how are you going to liquidate your assets without them?  I understand dividends and other mechanisms, but if you have 1M in an index fund and the market stops growing, and there is no one to buy your shares, where does that leave you? 

Just food for thought that you may not think you need "fools" but every time a 20something shows up and says "wow does this really work" her adoption of our collective investment strategy directly benefits us all.

I don't want to speak for L.A.S., but I suspect they're referring to price vs value. Stocks have a value (ownership in a productive business). Cryptocurrencies have no value (in the economic senseóthey're unproductive assets). Things with value can be priced at least somewhat objectively. There can, of course, be differences of opinion, but the price is ultimately grounded in reality. Valueless assets (cryptocurrencies, paintings, beanie babies, rare coins, etc.) have no rational basis for their price. They are speculative. Speculative investments depend on "bigger fools" to purchase them from you. Productive assets depend on rational actors.

waltworks

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 2665
Re: OFFICIAL: Blockchain / Crypto-Currency Portfolios and Discussion
« Reply #1072 on: March 02, 2018, 09:24:28 PM »
It's worth noting that there certainly can be a scenario where nobody will buy your stocks from you, and you are screwed.

In the grand scheme of things, that's the asteroid-impact/zombie apocalypse scenario, though, so who cares? You're dead.

-W

misterhorsey

  • Bristles
  • ***
  • Posts: 347
Re: OFFICIAL: Blockchain / Crypto-Currency Portfolios and Discussion
« Reply #1073 on: March 03, 2018, 05:37:08 AM »

I said in order to liquidate your investment you must have someone to sell the shares(or have the firm liquidate all its assets, whatever's left after satisfying their debts). 



No. This is not what you said.  You said that a "bigger fool" must be present.  This is simply wrong in the context of stocks.  Bigger fools are not required.

Maybe we have a misunderstanding here.  My exact sentence was that in order to liquidate your shares there must be someone to sell them to.  The concept of "bigger fool" is an emotional label that you used, and i re-used for illustrative purposes.  Are you saying that the people buying shares are not fools?  Because that's an issue of labeling. 

If you are saying they are not necessary, then how are you going to liquidate your assets without them?  I understand dividends and other mechanisms, but if you have 1M in an index fund and the market stops growing, and there is no one to buy your shares, where does that leave you? 

Just food for thought that you may not think you need "fools" but every time a 20something shows up and says "wow does this really work" her adoption of our collective investment strategy directly benefits us all.

There's definitely a misunderstanding in terminology here.

The greater fool theory is not an emotional label. The 'greater fool theory' describes a form of speculation. It's where someone buys an asset (and that can be crypto, tulips, stocks, bonds, real estate) and has a sincere belief that although that the price of that asset is no longer accurately correlated with the value of the asset, they are willing to buy it in order to sell shortly afterwards at a profit.  The speculator in this instance may believe the asset is priced well above it's value, or they may believe it has no intrinsic value.  However, they do not care. They are buying the asset, in order to sell it, to a 'greater fool' who will happily pay more for it.

Forgive me for citing wikipedia here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greater_fool_theory

But when you sell stocks, you aren't necessarily selling them because you think they aren't worth anything, and want to offload them to a 'bigger' or 'greater fool'.  You may actually need to liquidate stocks for other reasons. For example, you can't buy food with stocks - and you might want to eat! So you sell some shares for cash.  You could also be in a position where you believe your stocks to be a certain value, where you believe that the value may well increase, but you still decide to sell these stocks.  This is simply liquidating a position from stocks to cash.  You may then use that cash to invest in a different asset class that may be more attractive for other reasons.

I could be wrong, but your post seems to suggest that the only time one would ever sell stocks is to liquidate your entire position.   Or if you no longer believe they are of value.

Another situation is where someone adjusts their asset allocation based on their age.  At age 70 it's prudent to adjust your asset allocation to more capital stable investments. You may decide to sell stocks in exchange for cash, but it's not because you don't believe they are of value but because you prefer the stability of cash over the volatility of stocks.  The buyer might be a 20 year old just starting out in investment. The value of the stocks remains the same - however what is appropriate for each investor is relative to their own life circumstances.

shadow

  • Stubble
  • **
  • Posts: 116
Re: OFFICIAL: Blockchain / Crypto-Currency Portfolios and Discussion
« Reply #1074 on: March 03, 2018, 09:05:21 AM »
Valueless assets (cryptocurrencies, paintings, beanie babies, rare coins, etc.) have no rational basis for their price.

Crypto has value. Dapps and other services require crypto; the form of digital social contract people are engaging in require crypto. People are using it as medium-of-exchanges.   

GuitarStv

  • Senior Mustachian
  • ********
  • Posts: 10659
  • Age: 36
  • Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Re: OFFICIAL: Blockchain / Crypto-Currency Portfolios and Discussion
« Reply #1075 on: March 03, 2018, 09:14:10 AM »
Valueless assets (cryptocurrencies, paintings, beanie babies, rare coins, etc.) have no rational basis for their price.

Crypto has value. Dapps and other services require crypto; the form of digital social contract people are engaging in require crypto. People are using it as medium-of-exchanges.

Pokemon cards have value.  Engaging in a card based game of Pokemon requires them.  People even trade Pokemon cards, using them as a medium of exchange.

The problem with your argument is that each instance of 'value' brought forth is vanishingly small, and only of value to the tiny niche group of people who have bought into the hype.  This is also true of comic books, beanie babies, tulips, rare coins, etc.

shadow

  • Stubble
  • **
  • Posts: 116
Re: OFFICIAL: Blockchain / Crypto-Currency Portfolios and Discussion
« Reply #1076 on: March 03, 2018, 09:48:47 AM »
Valueless assets (cryptocurrencies, paintings, beanie babies, rare coins, etc.) have no rational basis for their price.

Crypto has value. Dapps and other services require crypto; the form of digital social contract people are engaging in require crypto. People are using it as medium-of-exchanges.

Pokemon cards have value.  Engaging in a card based game of Pokemon requires them.  People even trade Pokemon cards, using them as a medium of exchange.

The problem with your argument is that each instance of 'value' brought forth is vanishingly small, and only of value to the tiny niche group of people who have bought into the hype.  This is also true of comic books, beanie babies, tulips, rare coins, etc.

The difference from these collectibles is that some crypto generate fees for its hodlers. 'Delegates' in some crypto systems, which I'm not a fan of, earn transaction fees through validating the network. They are require to set up a crypto node or participate in a pool. Proof-of-stake systems will allow any hodler with a minimum, such as 1 unit, to validate the network, earning transaction fees. 

'Vanishingly small' and 'tiny niche group', where are you getting these numbers from? Coinbase alone has over 13 million users, verified with photo id and linked bank accounts. In one year, the number of transactions for one of the top crypto went from 50,000 to 750,000 daily with a high over 1.2 mil. Crypto usage has also seen rise for social network tips and charitable donations.   

waltworks

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 2665
Re: OFFICIAL: Blockchain / Crypto-Currency Portfolios and Discussion
« Reply #1077 on: March 03, 2018, 12:27:40 PM »
Oh, come now. How many of those 13 million people are buying *anything* IRL with that crypto? How many are just trading crypto around with each other (or just buying/holding for "investment" purposes)?

I think "niche" is a fair term here. It's well established that you can buy virtually nothing with crypto, and if you do, it'll probably cost you a fortune/take forever/get you defrauded.

-W

shadow

  • Stubble
  • **
  • Posts: 116
Re: OFFICIAL: Blockchain / Crypto-Currency Portfolios and Discussion
« Reply #1078 on: March 03, 2018, 12:39:26 PM »
It may or may not be a niche. It's less debatable than 'vanishingly small' and 'tiny niche group', where we see an increase in number of users and transactions.

Quote
It's well established that you can buy virtually nothing with crypto

This is an empty statement. That crypto is being using as speculation does not mean that crypto is solely used for that. People are using crypto for various purposes, including entertainment and other purchases and services.

BattlaP

  • Stubble
  • **
  • Posts: 164
Re: OFFICIAL: Blockchain / Crypto-Currency Portfolios and Discussion
« Reply #1079 on: March 03, 2018, 01:18:59 PM »
Valueless assets (cryptocurrencies, paintings, beanie babies, rare coins, etc.) have no rational basis for their price.

Crypto has value. Dapps and other services require crypto; the form of digital social contract people are engaging in require crypto. People are using it as medium-of-exchanges.

Pokemon cards have value.  Engaging in a card based game of Pokemon requires them.  People even trade Pokemon cards, using them as a medium of exchange.

The problem with your argument is that each instance of 'value' brought forth is vanishingly small, and only of value to the tiny niche group of people who have bought into the hype.  This is also true of comic books, beanie babies, tulips, rare coins, etc.

The difference from these collectibles is that some crypto generate fees for its hodlers. 'Delegates' in some crypto systems, which I'm not a fan of, earn transaction fees through validating the network. They are require to set up a crypto node or participate in a pool. Proof-of-stake systems will allow any hodler with a minimum, such as 1 unit, to validate the network, earning transaction fees. 

'Vanishingly small' and 'tiny niche group', where are you getting these numbers from? Coinbase alone has over 13 million users, verified with photo id and linked bank accounts. In one year, the number of transactions for one of the top crypto went from 50,000 to 750,000 daily with a high over 1.2 mil. Crypto usage has also seen rise for social network tips and charitable donations.   

Proof of stake just gives you more of the same thing, it's literally a circular argument in terms of value.

Let's be real here, the only value is to those who are needing illegal cross border transactions, those requiring anonymity or people of a very particular anti-centralised anything political persuasion. Everyone else is speculating that one day they will have a wider value to common people.

shadow

  • Stubble
  • **
  • Posts: 116
Re: OFFICIAL: Blockchain / Crypto-Currency Portfolios and Discussion
« Reply #1080 on: March 03, 2018, 01:41:33 PM »
Proof of stake just gives you more of the same thing, it's literally a circular argument in terms of value.

People can earn fees that they can convert to fiat. Their crypto allows them to generate these fees, base on network transactions.

Quote
Let's be real here, the only value is to those who are needing illegal cross border transactions, those requiring anonymity or people of a very particular anti-centralised anything political persuasion. Everyone else is speculating that one day they will have a wider value to common people.

Cryptokitties, cryptocountries, etheroll, etc, these have no value or interest to me. However, some people are using it for entertainment or other services; it has value to these people. Youtube and twitch content producers or streamers are being patronaged with crypto. And even if people use it for speculation or to crowdfund a speculative project, or people using it to buy vpns, these are still uses of crypto. Base on the trend, there will be more uses and different types of use-cases.

There is value in crypto, and there is significant, legitimate value in it beyond ideological or criminal use.

sol

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 6562
  • Age: 41
  • Location: Pacific Northwest
Re: OFFICIAL: Blockchain / Crypto-Currency Portfolios and Discussion
« Reply #1081 on: March 03, 2018, 04:37:45 PM »
That crypto is being using as speculation does not mean that crypto is solely used for that. People are using crypto for various purposes, including entertainment and other purchases and services.

Thus far, you can't pay for rent, or groceries, or energy with cryptocurrencies.  Trading it back and forth between users for "entertainment" does not make it a currency.  I used to trade baseball cards back and forth with other baseball card enthusiasts, but we never mistook them for currency because we couldn't use them in the broader economy and they weren't backed by anyone. 

Even if you find a merchant who will accept payment in baseball cards, that STILL doesn't make them currency. 

misterhorsey

  • Bristles
  • ***
  • Posts: 347
Re: OFFICIAL: Blockchain / Crypto-Currency Portfolios and Discussion
« Reply #1082 on: March 03, 2018, 07:51:43 PM »
Just because landlords, supermarkets or energy utilities don't accept cryptocurrency doesn't mean it's not a currency. If someone accepts crypto in exchange for goods and services, anticipating that they can then use that crypto to purchase goods and services, then it's a currency.

It's like tobacco or ramen in prison.  It's used as a store of value in a closed economic system.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/aug/22/ramen-prison-currency-study

I don't think it serves the arguments of crypto skeptics to deny the utility of crypto currency, wherever one may find it. 

However, based on my understanding, that utility seems extremely limited.

As a currency they suffer some pretty significant draw backs.  They are nowhere near as universal as the USD, the Euro, Yen, AUD etc etc, and they are incredibly niche in their acceptance. Their volatility and high transaction fees make them very unattractive as a source of value exchange.

https://www.theverge.com/2017/12/6/16743220/valve-steam-bitcoin-game-store-payment-method-crypto-volatility

That may change in the future. But it may not.

One of the ironies I struggle to look beyond is that although the rationale behind the rapid price appreciation of crypto currencies is they represent the disruptive currencies of the future, yet at the moment, the rampant speculation resulting in extreme volatility of these crypto currencies actually renders them incredibly unattractive for actual use as a currency.

GuitarStv

  • Senior Mustachian
  • ********
  • Posts: 10659
  • Age: 36
  • Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Re: OFFICIAL: Blockchain / Crypto-Currency Portfolios and Discussion
« Reply #1083 on: March 04, 2018, 06:59:44 AM »
Just because landlords, supermarkets or energy utilities don't accept cryptocurrency doesn't mean it's not a currency. If someone accepts crypto in exchange for goods and services, anticipating that they can then use that crypto to purchase goods and services, then it's a currency.

It's like tobacco or ramen in prison.  It's used as a store of value in a closed economic system.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/aug/22/ramen-prison-currency-study

I don't think it serves the arguments of crypto skeptics to deny the utility of crypto currency, wherever one may find it. 

However, based on my understanding, that utility seems extremely limited.

As a currency they suffer some pretty significant draw backs.  They are nowhere near as universal as the USD, the Euro, Yen, AUD etc etc, and they are incredibly niche in their acceptance. Their volatility and high transaction fees make them very unattractive as a source of value exchange.

https://www.theverge.com/2017/12/6/16743220/valve-steam-bitcoin-game-store-payment-method-crypto-volatility

That may change in the future. But it may not.

One of the ironies I struggle to look beyond is that although the rationale behind the rapid price appreciation of crypto currencies is they represent the disruptive currencies of the future, yet at the moment, the rampant speculation resulting in extreme volatility of these crypto currencies actually renders them incredibly unattractive for actual use as a currency.

Literally any good is a currency by this definition, because any good can be used as a store of value given the right circumstances.  Seems kinda goofy.  I think that you have to look as the other available stores of value in a system and compare them. Calling Pokemon cards or crypto a currency makes little sense when compared to the ubiquity and utility use of say, US dollars.

misterhorsey

  • Bristles
  • ***
  • Posts: 347
Re: OFFICIAL: Blockchain / Crypto-Currency Portfolios and Discussion
« Reply #1084 on: March 04, 2018, 02:04:39 PM »
It's kind of my point to point out the goofiness.

Ultimately, any good has the potential to be a currency.  But that doesn't mean it makes a good currency.

https://www.npr.org/sections/money/2011/02/15/131934618/the-island-of-stone-money

But there's a distinction between currencies, which are things traded for their function as a store of value, and collectables, things that are traded for their inherent and perceived value. Critics of crypto currency seem to sometimes miss this distinction when they lump crypto together with other subjects of speculative bubbles.

People might trade Pokemon cards, but that doesn't make it a currency. They don't use Pokemon as a  store of value that they exchange for goods or services, as far as I know.

There's no doubt that crypto currency is also the subject of a speculative bubble.

But my point is simply that denying the (extremely limited, niche and conditional) utility of crypto currency is to invite a counter argument establishing the utility from crypto currency users.  However accepting that it currently does have use as a currency, allows for a more qualitative assessment about the nature of that utility.

I guess I sense that among certain fans of crypto currency there's the belief that because crypto currency is accepted for payment in certain places, it's the portent of things to come.  But there's no magic or wizardry involved - all it takes is for a a consensus to use it. And that consensus doesn't have to be very big.  The internet allows a small group of people (relative to the larger economy) to use crypto currency, but be geographically spread out. For some, this may make the consensus seem larger than it really is.

And my reason for wanting to point all this out is that I think the better argument against crypto currency is simply to accept that yes, it can be used as a currency, but there are so many better options that do a better job as a currency (i.e. that are stable in value, universally accepted) why would you use it?

sol

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 6562
  • Age: 41
  • Location: Pacific Northwest
Re: OFFICIAL: Blockchain / Crypto-Currency Portfolios and Discussion
« Reply #1085 on: March 04, 2018, 05:21:30 PM »
there are so many better options that do a better job as a currency (i.e. that are stable in value, universally accepted) why would you use it?

1.  To move illegal drug money you can't transfer with a bank.

2.  To finance terrorist organizations without the FBI finding out.

3.  To support a rogue state, like North Korea, that is suffering under economic sanctions by the international community that prohibit direct contributions.

4.  As an unregulated penny stock you can pump and dump to get rich by misleading uninformed retail investors.

5.  For entertainment value, because you think the first four primary uses aren't at all concerning.


misterhorsey

  • Bristles
  • ***
  • Posts: 347
Re: OFFICIAL: Blockchain / Crypto-Currency Portfolios and Discussion
« Reply #1086 on: March 04, 2018, 07:30:42 PM »
Ha yes, good points.

Actually one that you didn't mention is if you are a Chinese Prince-ling, or Russian Oligarch, or even a well to do person in a state that doesn't enforce the rule of law, and you wish subvert capital controls and move money out of your home country as otherwise it will always be subject to seizure by the state if you keep it there.

Mr Mark

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 1127
  • Location: Planet Earth
  • Achieved Financial Independence summer 2014. RE'18
Re: OFFICIAL: Blockchain / Crypto-Currency Portfolios and Discussion
« Reply #1087 on: March 04, 2018, 08:48:28 PM »
there are so many better options that do a better job as a currency (i.e. that are stable in value, universally accepted) why would you use it?

1.  To move illegal drug money you can't transfer with a bank.

2.  To finance terrorist organizations without the FBI finding out.

3.  To support a rogue state, like North Korea, that is suffering under economic sanctions by the international community that prohibit direct contributions.

4.  As an unregulated penny stock you can pump and dump to get rich by misleading uninformed retail investors.

5.  For entertainment value, because you think the first four primary uses aren't at all concerning.

And notice that none of these uses imparts an intrinsic relative value. As a agency of transfer it doesn't matter if a BTC costs $100000 or $1 as long as it's stable-ish while the transfer occurs.
Mr. Mark

$25 free for your hotel stays by using this link to join  Booking.com https://www.booking.com/s/27_8/ef1fdaad

trollwithamustache

  • Bristles
  • ***
  • Posts: 487
Re: OFFICIAL: Blockchain / Crypto-Currency Portfolios and Discussion
« Reply #1088 on: March 05, 2018, 08:41:18 AM »
I'm always curious how much Pot is smoked by the people who hammer bitcoin first and foremost for being used for illegal drug purchases.

sol

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 6562
  • Age: 41
  • Location: Pacific Northwest
Re: OFFICIAL: Blockchain / Crypto-Currency Portfolios and Discussion
« Reply #1089 on: March 05, 2018, 09:56:27 AM »
I'm always curious how much Pot is smoked by the people who hammer bitcoin first and foremost for being used for illegal drug purchases.

If that was directed at me, then the answer is "none".  My job precludes most types of drug use.

Not that it really matters.  The problem with drug money isn't privately owned US dispensaries that grow in a co-op, the problem is international cartels that murder people and put their dismembered heads on the backs of desert tortoises. 

I don't avoid flying because terrorists have used airplanes, because there are legitimate uses for airplanes.  Cryptocurrencies don't seem to have any legitimate uses in their design brief.  They were created for the sole purpose of breaking the law.
« Last Edit: March 05, 2018, 10:46:58 AM by sol »

shadow

  • Stubble
  • **
  • Posts: 116
Re: OFFICIAL: Blockchain / Crypto-Currency Portfolios and Discussion
« Reply #1090 on: March 05, 2018, 10:41:36 AM »
Some brief thoughts.

In parts of Europe, they decriminalized the use of illegal drugs and set up clinics where they offer addicts a fix. It's working, and I hope to see the U.S. adopt a similiar attitude and laws regarding drugs. I remember watching a documentary on addicts, and one of the drug users was begging for money for drugs and as bypassers kept ignoring him, he started talking about robbing them. It was eerie watching that, as his desperation began to cloud his moral judgement. There will be initial costs to establishing something similiar to the European program, but I think in the long run, it can decrease costs in terms of crime, security, and medical care, and helping addicts to return to productive society. As to whether the U.S. will be able to facilitate something like this, there are philosophies of belief and financially-entrenched industries against it.

Some of the people that are crypto enthusiasts begin with the most skeptical of approaches before deciding to put in any amount of money. They have to consider the concerns and pitfalls, current and future regulation. They're not ignoring these things. They watch various congressional and other hearings. Things like cybercrime and North Korean money-laundering, all these are discussed. For criminal uses, they have task forces set up. Task forces and other reports all conclude that the use of crypto for criminal transactions are tiny compared to normal, legitimate uses. They actively monitor blockchain activities. In the end, blockchain is not going to go away, given its properties that allow for trusted digital social contracts.



Travis

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 2182
  • Location: Tempe, AZ
Re: OFFICIAL: Blockchain / Crypto-Currency Portfolios and Discussion
« Reply #1091 on: March 05, 2018, 12:08:37 PM »
there are so many better options that do a better job as a currency (i.e. that are stable in value, universally accepted) why would you use it?

1.  To move illegal drug money you can't transfer with a bank.

2.  To finance terrorist organizations without the FBI finding out.

3.  To support a rogue state, like North Korea, that is suffering under economic sanctions by the international community that prohibit direct contributions.

4.  As an unregulated penny stock you can pump and dump to get rich by misleading uninformed retail investors.

5.  For entertainment value, because you think the first four primary uses aren't at all concerning.

My modified #1 appears the be the closest thing to a legitimate use case for cryptocurrency; however, the only way a government will allow it to be considered a legitimate form of money is if it can be monitored and audited for reasons of #1-4 and for tax purposes.  I've seen far too many proponents talk about "getting one over on The Man" and avoiding the paper trails common with currency. That's not a benefit folks, that's a significant bar to being considered legal. 
My Journal: http://forum.mrmoneymustache.com/journals/will-i-or-won't-i-a-home-run-or-a-base-hit/

Unlike some other tech companies or skilled-labor industries, we're always hiring.

www.goarmy.com


James_001

  • 5 O'Clock Shadow
  • *
  • Posts: 12
Re: OFFICIAL: Blockchain / Crypto-Currency Portfolios and Discussion
« Reply #1093 on: March 14, 2018, 08:12:05 AM »
Has anyone invested in this? https://crypto20.com/en/

Its an index fund for the top 20 crypto coins. I would be curious to hear your thoughts...

L.A.S.

  • Pencil Stache
  • ****
  • Posts: 623
Re: OFFICIAL: Blockchain / Crypto-Currency Portfolios and Discussion
« Reply #1094 on: March 14, 2018, 09:46:09 AM »
Has anyone invested in this? https://crypto20.com/en/

Its an index fund for the top 20 crypto coins. I would be curious to hear your thoughts...

Well, since you asked....

I think its a scam.

The underlying coins are basically all scams.  So a diversified collections of scams is still a scam. 

Perhaps we should come up with a collective noun for scams the way the British have done for birds and animals (e.g. murder of ravens, parliament of owls)?  Perhaps we call a collection of crypto scams, an aysio ("eye-see-oh") of scams?
« Last Edit: March 14, 2018, 10:01:51 AM by L.A.S. »

runbikerun

  • Stubble
  • **
  • Posts: 206
Re: OFFICIAL: Blockchain / Crypto-Currency Portfolios and Discussion
« Reply #1095 on: March 14, 2018, 10:44:35 AM »
We interrupt these arguments to bring you some news:

Brazilian State Bank to Tokenize Brazilian Real on Ethereumís Public Blockchain

Coinbase is launching a weighted index fund for cryptocurrencies.

In other news, Google is banning all cryptocurrency advertising from June onwards.

aspiringnomad

  • Pencil Stache
  • ****
  • Posts: 704
Re: OFFICIAL: Blockchain / Crypto-Currency Portfolios and Discussion
« Reply #1096 on: March 14, 2018, 09:10:46 PM »
We interrupt these arguments to bring you some news:

Brazilian State Bank to Tokenize Brazilian Real on Ethereumís Public Blockchain

Coinbase is launching a weighted index fund for cryptocurrencies.

In other news, Google is banning all cryptocurrency advertising from June onwards.

Guess I'll stop seeing ads for that dorky turtle neck wearing "Crypto Genius" on these forums.


jmecklenborg

  • Stubble
  • **
  • Posts: 134
Re: OFFICIAL: Blockchain / Crypto-Currency Portfolios and Discussion
« Reply #1098 on: March 19, 2018, 01:22:17 PM »
Guess I'll stop seeing ads for that dorky turtle neck wearing "Crypto Genius" on these forums.

Way up there on my list of people who I'd really like to punch.  Up there with him is that guy with the glasses in LA showing off his [rented] Beverly Hills house and [rented] Lambo. 

That second guy was a little late to the crypto circus, as illustrated by a video that appeared in late 2017 where you could tell he was trying to posit himself as the "crypto genius" while not quite knowing what he was talking about. 

Travis

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 2182
  • Location: Tempe, AZ
Re: OFFICIAL: Blockchain / Crypto-Currency Portfolios and Discussion
« Reply #1099 on: March 19, 2018, 01:28:56 PM »
Guess I'll stop seeing ads for that dorky turtle neck wearing "Crypto Genius" on these forums.

Way up there on my list of people who I'd really like to punch.  Up there with him is that guy with the glasses in LA showing off his [rented] Beverly Hills house and [rented] Lambo. 

That second guy was a little late to the crypto circus, as illustrated by a video that appeared in late 2017 where you could tell he was trying to posit himself as the "crypto genius" while not quite knowing what he was talking about.

To whom are you referring? The only guy I know matching that description is in hiding and being sued for shilling Bitconnect.
My Journal: http://forum.mrmoneymustache.com/journals/will-i-or-won't-i-a-home-run-or-a-base-hit/

Unlike some other tech companies or skilled-labor industries, we're always hiring.

www.goarmy.com