I did buy the imitation crab chunks, which are not too smelly and cost about the same as ham, and no one noticed.
Just so you know, the imitation crab is usually made with fish, so if you can't bring fish then you can't bring imitation crab.
I'm not looking forward to navigating allergies in school lunches in a couple of years.
I know. I cheated. I thought the rules were extreme and we were not feeding anyone else. If a kid has a life event due to traces of fish from surimi (original term for what this really is) that may be on my kids fingers.. I don't think so. At least the no dairy parents don't insist on a ban unless super life threat is involved.
I figured that my kid's asthma and grass allergy was more severe than some of these kids foods, but I don't ban outdoor shoes from entering classroom. Even if he was not allowed out on some days himself.
Out of curiosity, do you know how severe the allergies were, for them to institute a ban? I would think they wouldn't do that unless the allergy was severe. And while it's annoying to have to figure out lunches that meet the requirements, I can virtually guarantee you that it's more than annoying for the kid with the allergy and their parents.
Ha! I can pretty much guarantee that the egg, fish and fruit allergies were not severe. The moms' (two) with the severe peanuts and sesame allergies would bring it up in a nice way when parents were waiting for kids, or whenever, so you knew these were strong, go to the emergency if you can't find the epipen.
One mom admitted in grade 4 that their son did not have peanut allergies, but wanted to be extra careful because her nephew did. Another parent took away the egg and citrus ban in grade 5 or 6 saying that "it is only a problem if my son eats it, but someone else in the class can eat it no problem" (I think it was a digestive intolerance distress, only - not life threatening).
The point is that in Canadian schools, pretty much any food gets banned at the drop of a hat or simple note from the parent. They (school) actively ask in first grade what kids are allergic to (without stating the food ban consequences), so parents think it is just for the class party potluck list, not lunches. Once on the list, you have to take initiative to remove it.
As to making lunches around allergies, I definitely agree to do it on principle, however far too many items are on the allergy list through GRADE 7!! If a 10 year old can not figure out how to not eat something, or pick where they want to sit (away from the egg salad eater), something is wrong.
Imagine lunch restrictions on all of the following at the same time:
All of these have appeared on my lists, and none of them are unusual. Usually some for my DD lunch and others for my DS, but that is getting worse, as if there is one kid, if they share a music room, then the food is banned across many classes.
1) All fish & Shellfish
2) Sesame (think many crackers, hummus, etc is banned)
3) All dairy (trace milk allergies are brutal for the kid, when severe)
4) Strawberries, kiwi, citrus, bananas
5) Peanuts & peanut oil
6) Nuts
7) Eggs
8) Sugary foods / drinks / snacks including many granola bars (Teacher / principal specific health initiatives)
9) No heated foods (no microwave or hot water available)
10)Need to eat in under 15 minutes
and your kid has digestive trouble with wheat breads and soy, and you prefer not to buy bologna and cheap pepperoni too often.
and you are watching the budget.
What do you serve? Cold chickpeas and lettuce wrapped on a corn tortilla?, carrots with ranch dip, apple. Homemade muffins, maybe..
How many kids want that every day...? I know lunch was often more like a snack to my DS, with a bigger meal at home after school.