Tinkering around a bit with the ACA plan estimator (Washington health plan finder in my case) this morning to see what impact increasing on-paper income would have on my health costs. In past years I have always just used Molina Cascade Silver as my default, because at moderate income levels (25-30k for a single person, 50-60k for a 2 person household) that has been the most reasonable option. But now it looks like due to shifts in the deductible/co-pay/OOP limit structures the Cascade GOLD plans are now the much better option -- slightly higher premiums, but much better on the other fronts.
For example, for a one person household with 30k in income, the plans look like this:
Silver:
$127 monthly premium after credits, $2500 deductible, $30 PCP copay, $20 generic prescription copay, and $7250 OOP max
Gold:
$151 monthly premium after credits, $600 deductible ($0 prescription deductible), $15 PCP copay, $10 generic prescription copay, and $5900 OOP max
For many people, the savings on copays/prescriptions alone would make up for the slightly higher monthly premium, not to mention the big savings on deductibles and the lower OOP max.
Just curious if people in other states are seeing similar things and what might be behind the move to make gold plans a more attractive option than silver these days.
PS: Answered my own question -- looks like this is largely a function of the new state subsidies for affordable healthcare in Washington state that kicked in this year.
https://www.wahealthplanfinder.org/content/wahbe/global/en/about-the-exchange/what-is-the-exchange/cascade-care/cascade-care-savings.htmlLots more geeky info about ACA health insurance in Washington state here:
https://www.healthinsurance.org/health-insurance-marketplaces/washington/Interesting to see how this is working locally -- and perhaps a heads up for those in other states that might pursue similar programs